Event owner lens
Use this record to benchmark whether a comparable event makes the work after the room visible. The score is 37/100, so the next move is to benchmark the weakest pillars before repeating the format.
applied learning or working session agenda analysis
IAHR Congress and Conference Proceedings - IAHR Congresses and Conferences
This applied learning or working session in Business / Finance / Marketing shows 27 visible agenda rows from iahrweb.org and scores 37/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Network Design and Participation Architecture; the main limits are Follow Through and Learning Transfer. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Network design, and Learning transfer. The public record does not show follow-up or tracking, so the score should be read as design intent rather than... A practical reading: For a reader, this is a comparison record more than a model to copy: it reads as an applied learning or working session, with the strongest visible signal in network design and participation architecture and the biggest open question around follow through and learning transfer. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence. This page is an original public-evidence analysis, not a copy of the source agenda or an endorsement of the event. The score places the visible agenda in the thin outcome architecture band. The strongest visible pillars are Network Design, Participation Architecture, and Problem Specificity; the thinnest visible pillars are Follow Through, Learning Transfer, and Evidence Maturity. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Network design, and Learning transfer. The extracted agenda preview includes 40 visible rows. The most common formats are Keynote, Roundtable, and Panel; the most common inferred purposes are Deliberation, Thought Leadership, and Expert Framing.
Eight-pillar fingerprint
Hover any pillar to see what it measures and, where it scored low, what the agenda is missing.
Participation Architecture?55
Participation Architecture - 55/100. Participant work, contribution, interaction, and alternatives to passive broadcast.
Follow Through?5
Follow Through - 5/100. Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.Missing: Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
Problem Specificity?47
Problem Specificity - 47/100. A clear costly problem, objective, decision, or performance target.
Personalization?41
Personalization - 41/100. Role, path, goal, preparation, or connection tailoring for participants.
Network Design?62
Network Design - 62/100. Structured weak ties, bridge-building, mixers, and relationship persistence.
Learning Transfer?17
Learning Transfer - 17/100. Applied practice, feedback, workplace use, refreshers, and 30-90 day transfer.Missing: Build transfer into the agenda through practice, feedback, job aids, reflection, and 30-90 day use cases.
Evidence Maturity?31
Evidence Maturity - 31/100. Baseline, comparison, follow-up, isolation, and attribution confidence.Missing: Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
Future-of-Work Fit?42
Future-of-Work Fit - 42/100. Value against time, hybrid reality, accessibility, AI, and meeting load.
Fix the gaps
Field-tested exercises matched to this agenda's weakest pillars, from the exercise library.
Follow Through (5/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Mental Toughness Workshop • WorkshopBank · 15% Solutions • WorkshopBank · Network Patches
Learning Transfer (17/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Team Challenge Activity for Group Problem-Solving: Don't... · Thrilling, Quick Elimination Game to Boost Energy - Match... · Creative Brain Teaser & Fun Geometric Team Puzzle - T-Puzzle
Personalization (41/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Journey Mapping • WorkshopBank · Group Energiser & Perspective-Changing Exercise - Paradigm... · Photo Storytelling
Agenda Preview
The actual agenda we captured. Every block is classified by format and purpose. Open any block to see how we read it; the colored edge shows whether it is participant work, broadcast, logistics, or a showcase.
Room vs wrapper
28 percent of the 40 classified blocks put participants to work; the rest broadcast, show, or handle logistics. That mix is what drives the participation score.
Participant workBroadcastShowcaseLogistics
all eventFinally, in order to economize, or even make money out of the Congress, it is important to select an efficient but not overly expensive, conference agency. They can assist in ensuring that profitable arrangements and contracts are entered into in such a way...KeynoteExpert framing+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all event3. Welcome receptionReceptionOrientation+
Format · LogisticsReceptionA social or hospitality block. Pacing and informal connection, not participant work.
Evidence basisOutcome inferred from formatInferred from format
all event7. Tea/coffee and snacks during session breaks (if the Congress secretariat bears the cost)BreakPacing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisOutcome inferred from formatInferred from format
all event13. Media coverage and videotaping important events of the Congress, such as keynote addressesKeynoteExpert framing+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all event15. Expenses of keynote speakersKeynoteExpert framing+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all eventSend out the second circular (and poster) with the preliminary list of coordinators and events during the second half of the year.Poster sessionShowcase+
Format · ShowcasePoster sessionPresenters display work; attendees browse and ask questions. Some interaction, not structured work.
Evidence basisOutcome inferred from formatInferred from format
all event5.3.1. Keynote addresses.KeynoteExpert framing+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all eventA plenary session consists of an address by a speaker on a particular topic and responses by a panel of experts to the keynote speakers.PanelExpert framing+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all event5.3.3. Organized panelsPanelDiscussion+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all event5.3.5. Roundtable sessionsRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventRoundtable sessions consist of a maximum of 10 participants around a table. There are two types of roundtable formats.RoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all event5.3.5.1 Roundtables with titled papersRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all event5.3.5.2 Roundtables with open discussionRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventFinally, in order to economize, or even make money out of the Congress, it is important to select an efficient but not overly expensive, conference agency. They can assist in ensuring that profitable arrangements and contracts are entered into in such a way that a certain percentage of commissions, which most organising agencies get from the hotels they contract for accommodation, are recovered. Besides the commission, conference agencies can generally help secure one free room for every 25-30 rooms. This can be factored into the budget when calculating the costs for hosting keynote speakers, and scholars from less affluent countries and associations, for example.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event3. Welcome receptionOpening RemarksOrientation+
Format · BroadcastOpening RemarksFraming or welcome from the stage. Orients the room, not participatory.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event7. Tea/coffee and snacks during session breaks (if the Congress secretariat bears the cost)BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event13. Media coverage and videotaping important events of the Congress, such as keynote addressesKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event15. Expenses of keynote speakersKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventSend out the second circular (and poster) with the preliminary list of coordinators and events during the second half of the year.Poster SessionShowcase+
Format · ShowcasePoster SessionPresenters display work; attendees browse and ask questions. Some interaction, not structured work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventOpening reception, welcome event, etc. The registration desk should be at least partially open several days before the Congress officially opens.Opening RemarksOrientation+
Format · BroadcastOpening RemarksFraming or welcome from the stage. Orients the room, not participatory.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPast Congresses have amply demonstrated that senior scholars should not be burdened with the actual running of things, but serve instead as the patrons and advisors of the Congress . With their greater academic and institutional experiences, they can be more involved in the larger structures of the Congress organization and communication, so that younger, energetic scholars can be given the responsibility of the day-to-day planning and running of the Congress .DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventCongress organisers should carefully consider the advantages as well as disadvantages of using a university as compared to a hotel venue. In terms of finance, a university may be preferred, for financial reasons, but in terms of transportation, atmosphere, the need for having business meetings, receptions, cultural events after the academic program during the day, a hotel venue may be preferred. Since it is a major financial decision, organisers should bear in mind the costs involved in either case. Access to local restaurants, shops and entertainment spots, as well as local transportation, may also be a consideration.ReceptionRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsReceptionA social or hospitality block. Pacing and informal connection, not participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe IAHR Congress normally lasts 6 days, and with the exception of the Tokyo Congress, it has generally taken place in August or September. The following is a guide: Arrivals and registration on Sunday with opening receptions on Sunday afternoon/evening; the main events during the week with a day off for excursions (usually on Wednesday), and a farewell banquet (on Friday evening). The meeting of the General Assembly to be held on Saturday morning is followed by the official closing of the Congress.ReceptionRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsReceptionA social or hospitality block. Pacing and informal connection, not participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe academic program consists of six major groupings: 1. Keynote addresses, 2. Plenary sessions, 3. Organized panels, 4. Symposia, 5. Individual papers, 6. Roundtable sessions.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event5.3.1. Keynote addresses.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe keynote addresses are given by distinguished scholars who are invited by the Congress Academic Program Committee.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventA plenary session consists of an address by a speaker on a particular topic and responses by a panel of experts to the keynote speakers.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event5.3.3. Organized panelsPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe organized panels consist of usually four panelists (3 presenters and + a respondent, or 4 presenters and no respondent/discussant), with a panel convener as the chair. The duration is 2 hours, and it is expected that the convener of the panel will directly contact panelists and put together a single proposal for the entire panel. The proposal should contain the title of the panel, the names and institutional affiliations of the panellists (and respondent), and a 150 word abstract of the topic. The proposal must be sent by the convener.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventGroups of scholars engaged in a particular project which will likely lead to publication may submit a proposal for a symposium. It is expected that these groups will circulate their papers for discussion prior to the Congress (if not, enough copies should be brought to the Congress for the other symposium participants). The proposal should contain the title of the symposium, the names and institutional affiliations of the panelists (and respondent, if appropriate), and a 150 word abstract of the topic. The duration of the symposium is 2 hours. The proposal must be sent by the convener.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event5.3.5. Roundtable sessionsRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventRoundtable sessions consist of a maximum of 10 participants around a table. There are two types of roundtable formats.RoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event5.3.5.1 Roundtables with titled papersRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThese are meant for more detailed discussion among scholars on their respective research projects. Space for these sessions is limited. Proposals should consist of the title of the paper, full name and institutional affiliation of the presenter, and a 150 word abstract. Those whose proposals are accepted will subsequently need to send 10 copies of the complete paper in advance for circulation among those who register for the roundtable sessions. Scholars are encouraged to advertise their proposed roundtable sessions among their peers to enable maximum participation.RoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event5.3.5.2 Roundtables with open discussionRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThese are intended to provide a forum for open-ended on a topic of common interest to the invited speakers. No paper titles or abstracts are required, but the convenor must provide a title and proposal for the roundtable, with a list of the participants.RoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventNB:Please note that all Panel, Symposia and Roundtable conveners should ensure that the Congress Academic Program Committee receives the abstracts of individual papers within a panel/symposium/roundtable (if appropriate). This is necessary so that they may be included in the Book of Abstracts. This information helps participants to decide on which panels/symposia/roundtables, or parts of them, to attend. Even though convenors are responsible for submitting information on their panels and participants, etc., each individual participant is responsible for registering and informing the Congress Secretariat of the nature of their participation in the Congress.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanels, symposia and roundtable sessions deal with a variety of special topics, not necessarily related to the main theme of the Congress. The topics may reflect current concerns in the academic study of religion (for instance Religion and Violence, or Esotericism), or they may reflect meaningful topics in the hosting country (for instance, Aztec Sacrifice, Asian Shamanism, Vapostoli Prophets in Zimbabwe, or Diaspora Hinduism in South Africa), and can therefore function as a showcase of local scholarship.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventIt is further recommended that wherever possible attention should be paid to national, ethnic and gender balance in terms of keynote speakers and plenary discussants, as well as of participants.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event4) A record of the academic program, indicating sections and titles of papers, special lectures, linked symposia, abstracts of keynote lectures, etc.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
The Full Reading
Why It Ranks This Way +
Calibrated from GES design 38/100 and verified 38/100 with no fourth-loop cap.
Reader Takeaway. For a reader, this is a comparison record more than a model to copy: it reads as an applied learning or working session, with the strongest visible signal in network design and participation architecture and the biggest open question around follow through and learning transfer. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence.
Strongest signals: Network Design, Participation Architecture, and Problem Specificity. Weakest signals: Follow Through, Learning Transfer, and Evidence Maturity.
How This Agenda Could Improve +
- Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
- Build transfer into the agenda through practice, feedback, job aids, reflection, and 30-90 day use cases.
- Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
Fastest next move: Add named owners, dated next steps, and a visible continuation path before treating the event as outcome-ready.
Role-Specific Reading +
Sponsor lens
Look beyond exposure. Strong sponsor value would show qualified interaction, problem work, buyer learning, customer evidence, or follow-up. The practical sponsor move is to look for structured introductions, buyer-seller fit, and relationship persistence.
Designer lens
The agenda is useful as a pattern sample from iahrweb.org. Redesign attention should go first to the lowest-scoring pillars; in practice, turn the thinnest agenda blocks into participant work.
Executive lens
Treat the visible agenda as an operating plan. The executive move is to require owners, dates, and evidence before treating the event as strategic. If owners, proof, and follow-through are not visible, the public record does not yet prove strategic movement.
Aggregator lens
Treat the source URL as evidence, not decoration. The data-product move is to label the source boundary clearly before ranking the record before ranking or syndicating the record.
What GES Means Here +
The Gathering Effectiveness Score is a strict 0-100 public-evidence reading of the agenda across eight pillars. It rewards visible participant work, follow-through, transfer, network design, and proof mechanisms more than polish, speaker fame, attendance, or satisfaction.
Visible mechanisms: Participant work, Network design, Learning transfer.
Evidence boundary: Scores reflect visible agenda/source evidence and should not be read as proof of causal event impact.
Limitations, Score Caps, and Review Flags +
Limitations
- No visible follow-up, progress monitoring, or longitudinal tracking.
- No baseline measurement is visible.
Score caps
- No fourth-loop score cap applied.
Review flags
- No source-backed follow-up, validation, baseline, tracking, or impact evidence.
- No tracking, validation, feedback, or impact measurement found in the visible source text.
- High cleanup rate: many extracted rows were hidden or merged as fragments.
Is this proof the event worked? +
No. This is a strict public-evidence reading of the agenda. Proof would require baseline, comparison, follow-up, attribution, and impact evidence beyond the listing.
What should a reader inspect first? +
Start with the source URL, then compare the eight pillar scores against the agenda rows. The biggest opportunities usually sit in follow-through, evidence maturity, and participant work.
Why publish weak records? +
Weak records are part of the map. They show where public agendas still describe sessions and speakers more often than outcomes, commitments, transfer, or proof.
How should I use the rows? +
Read the agenda rows as the visible design trace: formats, purposes, and evidence labels show what the public source made inspectable, not everything that happened in the room. This is a source-grounded interpretation of the public agenda record, not a copy of the source, and not an endorsement of the event.
Embed the verified badge +
This record is in the hand-verified gold set. Copy the snippet below to embed the verified badge on your own site.
<a href="https://unitedwetransform.com/events/evt_2005_iahr_congress_and_conference_proceedings_iahr_congresses_and_conferences_ia"><img src="https://unitedwetransform.com/badge/ges-verified.svg" alt="GES verified by United We Transform" height="40"></a>Where To Go Next
Compare this agenda against other Business / Finance / Marketing events scored on the same eight pillars.