United We TransformCreate teamsGrade your agenda
Exercises/Closure and Transfer/Network Patches
Applied Improv · Closure and Transfer

Network Patches

Network Patches is an applied improv exercise for closure and transfer: it helps participants close the session and carry learning into the next action.

5 to 15 minutesTIME
Small group (4-8)GROUP SIZE
ActiveENERGY
In personSETTING
Medium cognitive loadCOGNITIVE LOAD
Strengthens Follow Through This closure and transfer exercise strengthens Follow Through, one of the eight Gathering Effectiveness pillars.

How to run it

  1. Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team
  2. Network Patches Timing Multiple hours/days Purpose/Objectives - Quick Description Commit to improving your team"s network performance by placing them in interactive, open ended People Science Patches Process Launch your People Science patches with an experienced Patchworker. Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team. Build out and expand your network. Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool. themed names - not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from. the periodic table, or even reality TV shows - anything to make it more fun Utilize different mechanisms that your patch would be interested in. For example, Lean In Circles, Work. Out Loud Circles, Leadership Tribes, etc. Share this article with participants to drive the importance of this work . KWWS // successful-employees People Science Data Capture Capture team and each week"s knowledge weaving Tags long-term, network performance, networking, patches, small groups Source Unknown 261 Why the emphasis on Network Performance? The ability to do our work better based on the input of others, and to make others" work better based on our contribution, is increasingly seen as the single most important characteristic of successful employees. Ten years ago, 78% of an employee"s impact on functional or business unit performance came from their individual task performance and only 22% came from network performance. Today, the breakdown is 51% task performance, 4 % network performance. A pretty even split. I am done with the mythos of great leaders, grand strategies, or the imposition of top-down cultural change. I trust in the small amplification of socialized effort, through ten dozen interactions between work colleagues over the days, weeks, and months, and the ecology of our chaotic connections leading to emergent order.I think business leaders and HR departments do not understand this shift, or the fact that this shift is accelerating, so that in a year or two 75% of a peoples" value will be based on their network performance, their ability to contribute to and accept from others. We will have to totally rethink performance measurement. It may in some sense be unmeasurable, but at the very least it should be some sort of distributed valuation based on all those who benefit from a person"s participation in work activities, weighted by the closeness and frequency of interaction. Today, it is madness to default to a single individual ' the supervisor ' to assess a person"s performance, if it ever made sense at all. I have a saying, almost a motto, actually I am made better by the sum of my connections, and so are my connections. There is a recursive elegance to the image of the company as a mesh of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of sets of people engaged in working socially, and by each being slightly more attuned to the needs and abilities of their connections the sets become more productive. This spreads to scenes ' like all the developers in the company who might benefit from innovations that one set has nurtured, or all the folks in the London office, perhaps ' and that can spread to the larger world of the entire enterprise. 262
  3. Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool.
  4. themed names not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from.
  5. Share this article with participants to drive the importance of this work .
  6. KWWS // successful-employees People Science Data Capture Capture team and each week"s knowledge weaving Tags long-term, network performance, networking, patches, small groups Source Unknown 261 Why the emphasis on Network Performance?
  7. Commit to improving your team"s network performance by placing them in interactive, open ended People Science Patches
Live facilitator

Run this exercise live

The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.

Prompts to use +

Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team

Network Patches Timing Multiple hours/days Purpose/Objectives - Quick Description Commit to improving your team"s network performance by placing them in interactive, open ended People Science Patches Process Launch your People Science patches with an experienced Patchworker. Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team. Build out and expand your network. Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool. themed names - not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from. the periodic table, or even reality TV shows - anything to make it more fun Utilize different mechanisms that your patch would be interested in. For example, Lean In Circles, Work. Out Loud Circles, Leadership Tribes, etc. Share this article with participants to drive the importance of this work . KWWS // successful-employees People Science Data Capture Capture team and each week"s knowledge weaving Tags long-term, network performance, networking, patches, small groups Source Unknown 261 Why the emphasis on Network Performance? The ability to do our work better based on the input of others, and to make others" work better based on our contribution, is increasingly seen as the single most important characteristic of successful employees. Ten years ago, 78% of an employee"s impact on functional or business unit performance came from their individual task performance and only 22% came from network performance. Today, the breakdown is 51% task performance, 4 % network performance. A pretty even split. I am done with the mythos of great leaders, grand strategies, or the imposition of top-down cultural change. I trust in the small amplification of socialized effort, through ten dozen interactions between work colleagues over the days, weeks, and months, and the ecology of our chaotic connections leading to emergent order.I think business leaders and HR departments do not understand this shift, or the fact that this shift is accelerating, so that in a year or two 75% of a peoples" value will be based on their network performance, their ability to contribute to and accept from others. We will have to totally rethink performance measurement. It may in some sense be unmeasurable, but at the very least it should be some sort of distributed valuation based on all those who benefit from a person"s participation in work activities, weighted by the closeness and frequency of interaction. Today, it is madness to default to a single individual ' the supervisor ' to assess a person"s performance, if it ever made sense at all. I have a saying, almost a motto, actually I am made better by the sum of my connections, and so are my connections. There is a recursive elegance to the image of the company as a mesh of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of sets of people engaged in working socially, and by each being slightly more attuned to the needs and abilities of their connections the sets become more productive. This spreads to scenes ' like all the developers in the company who might benefit from innovations that one set has nurtured, or all the folks in the London office, perhaps ' and that can spread to the larger world of the entire enterprise. 262

Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool.

themed names not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from.

Share this article with participants to drive the importance of this work .

Run this with your AI assistant +

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Adapt this exercise for my exact room. Exercise: Network Patches. Readiness: Publishable Draft. Core moves: Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team; Network Patches Timing Multiple hours/days Purpose/Objectives - Quick Description Commit to improving your team"s network performance by placing them in interactive, open ended People Science Patches Process Launch your People Science patches with an experienced Patchworker. Identify a facilitator and knowledge weaver per team. Build out and expand your network. Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool. themed names - not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from. the periodic table, or even reality TV shows - anything to make it more fun Utilize different mechanisms that your patch would be interested in. For example, Lean In Circles, Work. Out Loud Circles, Leadership Tribes, etc. Share this article with participants to drive the importance of this work . KWWS // successful-employees People Science Data Capture Capture team and each week"s knowledge weaving Tags long-term, network performance, networking, patches, small groups Source Unknown 261 Why the emphasis on Network Performance? The ability to do our work better based on the input of others, and to make others" work better based on our contribution, is increasingly seen as the single most important characteristic of successful employees. Ten years ago, 78% of an employee"s impact on functional or business unit performance came from their individual task performance and only 22% came from network performance. Today, the breakdown is 51% task performance, 4 % network performance. A pretty even split. I am done with the mythos of great leaders, grand strategies, or the imposition of top-down cultural change. I trust in the small amplification of socialized effort, through ten dozen interactions between work colleagues over the days, weeks, and months, and the ecology of our chaotic connections leading to emergent order.I think business leaders and HR departments do not understand this shift, or the fact that this shift is accelerating, so that in a year or two 75% of a peoples" value will be based on their network performance, their ability to contribute to and accept from others. We will have to totally rethink performance measurement. It may in some sense be unmeasurable, but at the very least it should be some sort of distributed valuation based on all those who benefit from a person"s participation in work activities, weighted by the closeness and frequency of interaction. Today, it is madness to default to a single individual ' the supervisor ' to assess a person"s performance, if it ever made sense at all. I have a saying, almost a motto, actually I am made better by the sum of my connections, and so are my connections. There is a recursive elegance to the image of the company as a mesh of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of sets of people engaged in working socially, and by each being slightly more attuned to the needs and abilities of their connections the sets become more productive. This spreads to scenes ' like all the developers in the company who might benefit from innovations that one set has nurtured, or all the folks in the London office, perhaps ' and that can spread to the larger world of the entire enterprise. 262; Cool Possibilities/Options Give team "cool.; themed names not team 1, 2, 3 rather, name them after constellations, elements from.. Return a concise facilitator script with timing, wording, safety notes, and remote/in-person adjustments.

Origin unverified

  • Where we observed it: The strongest current observations come from Relationship Makers Handbook; aggregators are listed as additional observations, not origin proof. (1 source observed, including Relationship Makers Handbook.)
  • What that means: we track where an exercise has been observed in public sources. We do not claim to know who created it, or how popular it is.
  • No efficacy claims: appearing in this library is not a claim that the exercise is proven effective. Facilitator judgment and context decide whether it works for a given room.
  • Corrections: if you have evidence of an earlier or more accurate source, read our methodology and trust boundary and tell us.

Pairs well with