Every public agenda, scored.
23,624 gatherings graded on eight pillars of outcome design. How to read this data ↓
The table below shows the selected gold set: 1,000 agenda readings chosen for source quality and inspectable evidence. Selection does not establish individual human review. The distribution above and the headline numbers cover the full corpus of 23,624.
How to read this data
Most of the corpus is provisional: agendas read and scored automatically, useful in aggregate but not individually hand-checked. The selected gold set is the subset chosen for source quality and inspectable evidence, so the table shows those 1,000 records rather than all 23,624. Selection does not establish that a person individually reviewed each record. The Gathering Effectiveness Score measures the visible outcome-design evidence in a public agenda, not the private quality of the event itself, so a low score records missing published evidence, not a failed gathering. Found a record that looks wrong? Every scorecard links its public source so you can check the evidence, and the methodology page explains how to request a correction.
What is the Atlas?
The Atlas is the verified searchable subset of public agenda records scored with the Gathering Effectiveness Score rubric.
Can I use the Atlas for benchmark research?
Yes. Use it to find examples, compare visible mechanisms, cite public scorecards, and keep the trust boundary clear.