Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 79a03aba82fa8eb8b59b07934203e20a10c693e34c66c201621154c7bc681f83

# Corporate Jinx

Small teams attempt to reach whole-room consensus across timed rounds. Each team submits one secret word per round, trying to match all other teams without inter-team communication.

**Time:** 15 minutes. 15 minutes total; includes a 3-minute setup, 7 minutes of rapid rounds, a 1-minute outcome check, and a 4-minute debrief.
**People:** 6 to 24. 3 or 4 small teams of 2 to 6 participants each, balanced as evenly as possible

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Observe how teams infer assumptions and adapt strategy when attempting alignment without direct cross-group communication.
**Use it when:** Use during workshops on cross-team coordination, siloed communication, or collaborative decision-making.
**Skip it when:** Skip when the group needs to resolve an active dispute or requires a concrete operational problem-solving tool rather than an abstract parlor exercise.

## Materials and tools

- Slips of blank paper (at least 10 slips per team)
- 1 pen or pencil per team
- 1 flipchart or whiteboard with dry-erase marker (for tracking submitted words)
- 1 countdown timer

## Before participants arrive

1. Seat 3 or 4 teams at separate tables or room corners so they can converse quietly without neighboring teams overhearing.
2. Pre-draw numbered round columns across the whiteboard, reserving the bottom half for a consolidated burned words list.
3. Distribute blank paper slips and one pen to each team.

## Say this to open

Our room goal is to reach complete consensus as quickly as possible. You succeed when every team submits the exact same word in the same round. You may talk freely within your own team, but you cannot speak, signal, or communicate with other teams. In each round, your team has sixty seconds to agree on one word, write it down, and hand it to me. Once any word has been submitted by any team, that word is burned. No team may ever submit it again.

## How to run it

### 1. Form teams and explain rules (3 minutes)

Divide participants into 3 or 4 teams of roughly equal size. Balance remainders across teams as evenly as possible. Deliver the opening script. Emphasize that teams discuss internally only, submit one word per round, and never reuse any previously submitted word.

### 2. Run submission rounds (7 minutes)

Run up to 5 rapid rounds. For each round, give teams 60 seconds to deliberate, write their word, and hand in their slip. Spend roughly 15 to 20 seconds reading submissions aloud anonymously and listing them on the board as burned words. Stop immediately if every team submits the exact same word. Otherwise, announce burned words and start the next round. Stop after round 5 or when the 7-minute mark arrives.

### 3. Announce outcome and transition (1 minutes)

Declare the final result: either the room achieved jinx consensus, or the round limit was reached. Point to the recorded list of burned words on the board as evidence of the group's convergence or divergence.

### 4. Debrief consensus patterns (4 minutes)

Facilitate a short debrief using the prepared questions. Call on 2 or 3 volunteers per question to stay within time.


## Debrief questions

- What strategies did your team use to guess what other teams might pick?
- How did the rule banning previously used words change your choices from round to round?
- What does this exercise show about trying to align teams when direct cross-department communication is blocked?

**Finished output:** A visible flipchart record of submitted and retired words across successive rounds, showing either full consensus or round exhaustion.

## Remote

Create 3 or 4 breakout rooms with equal participant numbers. The facilitator keeps the main room open and shares a live document or whiteboard. Each team designates a scribe who direct-messages their chosen word privately to the facilitator in the main chat when time is called. The facilitator types all submitted words onto the shared screen without attribution, keeping the full list of burned words continuously visible to everyone throughout the game.

## Hybrid

Form teams containing both in-person and remote participants, or assign remote participants to their own team. Each team uses a private chat thread or separate audio channel to deliberate. Teams submit their chosen word via direct message or folded paper slip to the facilitator. The facilitator displays all submitted words on a shared screen that is continuously visible to both in-room and remote participants.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may contribute verbally, write suggestions on scratch paper, or observe team deliberation without an obligation to speak.
- A participant may choose a non-speaking role such as scribe or slip runner to participate without public speaking pressure.

## If the session gets stuck

**Teams whisper across tables or use visible hand gestures to coordinate words.**

Remind the room immediately that non-verbal signaling invalidates the round. Nullify any matching round achieved through signaling and enforce a clean round.

**A team accidentally submits a word that was already burned in an earlier round.**

Announce that the submission is invalid because the word is burned. Consensus cannot occur in this round since all teams must submit valid matching words. Record the invalid submission, add any new words from other teams to the burned list, and move to the next round.


## Terms used here

- Consensus (in this game): The condition where every separate team independently submits the identical word in the same round.
- Burned word: Any word submitted by any team in an earlier round, making it permanently ineligible for reuse by all teams.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Playmeo library records, which attribute the activity design to Mark Collard.

Retained the core Playmeo game mechanic: 3 to 4 teams, timed deliberation rounds, intra-team discussion only, no cross-team contact, anonymous word readout, and permanent elimination of previously submitted words. UWT adjusted the round pacing to 5 rounds (deliberation plus facilitator recording) within a 7-minute block, clarified invalid submission handling, added flexible team sizing (6 to 24 participants), remote/hybrid plans, an opening script, and debrief questions.

[Playmeo](https://www.playmeo.com/activities/trust-building-games/corporate-jinx)

[Playmeo](https://www.playmeo.com/activities/trust-building-games/corporate-jinx/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/consensus-building-game-explores-decision-making-corporate-jinx/