Event owner lens
Use this record to benchmark whether a comparable event makes the work after the room visible. The score is 38/100, so the next move is to benchmark the weakest pillars before repeating the format.
action-oriented convening agenda analysis
Summit 2026
This action-oriented convening in Unknown shows 25 visible agenda rows from saferbuildings.net and scores 38/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Evidence Maturity and Problem Specificity; the main limits are Follow Through and Participation Architecture. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Follow-up, Impact evidence, and Network design. Follow-through or tracking is at least visible enough to inspect, though causal proof still depends on stronger evidence. A practical reading: For a reader, this is a comparison record more than a model to copy: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in evidence maturity and problem specificity and the biggest open question around follow through and participation architecture. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to execution quality beyond the public agenda. This page is an original public-evidence analysis, not a copy of the source agenda or an endorsement of the event. The score places the visible agenda in the thin outcome architecture band. The strongest visible pillars are Evidence Maturity, Problem Specificity, and Future-of-Work Fit; the thinnest visible pillars are Follow Through, Participation Architecture, and Learning Transfer. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Follow-up, Impact evidence, Network design, and Learning transfer. The extracted agenda preview includes 25 visible rows. The most common formats are Unknown, Keynote, and Fireside Chat; the most common inferred purposes are Unknown, Deliberation, and Thought Leadership.
Eight-pillar fingerprint
Hover any pillar to see what it measures and, where it scored low, what the agenda is missing.
Participation Architecture?28
Participation Architecture - 28/100. Participant work, contribution, interaction, and alternatives to passive broadcast.Missing: Turn passive airtime into participant work: practice, sensemaking, decisions, critique, or artifact creation.
Follow Through?19
Follow Through - 19/100. Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.Missing: Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
Problem Specificity?48
Problem Specificity - 48/100. A clear costly problem, objective, decision, or performance target.
Personalization?39
Personalization - 39/100. Role, path, goal, preparation, or connection tailoring for participants.
Network Design?37
Network Design - 37/100. Structured weak ties, bridge-building, mixers, and relationship persistence.
Learning Transfer?33
Learning Transfer - 33/100. Applied practice, feedback, workplace use, refreshers, and 30-90 day transfer.Missing: Build transfer into the agenda through practice, feedback, job aids, reflection, and 30-90 day use cases.
Evidence Maturity?49
Evidence Maturity - 49/100. Baseline, comparison, follow-up, isolation, and attribution confidence.
Future-of-Work Fit?48
Future-of-Work Fit - 48/100. Value against time, hybrid reality, accessibility, AI, and meeting load.
Fix the gaps
Field-tested exercises matched to this agenda's weakest pillars, from the exercise library.
Follow Through (19/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Mental Toughness Workshop • WorkshopBank · 15% Solutions • WorkshopBank · Network Patches
Participation Architecture (28/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Make A World · Awestruck 3 Minutes · Spectrum Mapping
Learning Transfer (33/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Team Challenge Activity for Group Problem-Solving: Don't... · Thrilling, Quick Elimination Game to Boost Energy - Match... · Creative Brain Teaser & Fun Geometric Team Puzzle - T-Puzzle
Agenda Preview
The actual agenda we captured. Every block is classified by format and purpose. Open any block to see how we read it; the colored edge shows whether it is participant work, broadcast, logistics, or a showcase.
Room vs wrapper
8 percent of the 25 classified blocks put participants to work; the rest broadcast, show, or handle logistics. That mix is what drives the participation score.
Participant workBroadcastShowcaseLogistics
all eventParkingUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisLowRead from source
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM· RegistrationRegistrationLogistics+
Format · LogisticsRegistrationCheck-in and logistics, not agenda content.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
8:00 to 9:00 AM· NetworkingNetworkingRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsNetworkingUnstructured mixing. Can carry incidental connection, but is not scored as designed network work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:00 to 9:15 AMTable Setter: 9-1-1 InsideUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:25 to 9:55 AM· Fireside ChatFireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:55 to 10:25 AM· Power SessionPresentationKnowledge Transfer+
Format · BroadcastPresentationSpeakers present, the audience receives. Awareness only unless paired with practice or follow-up.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
11:05 to 11:35 AM· KeynoteKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
11:35 AM - 12:00 PM· Keynote Fireside ChatKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventRep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) - Chairman, House Communications & Technology Subcommittee. Principal congressional authority over the FCC, spectrum, and public safety communications. Chairman Hudson plays a central role in shaping federal telecommunications policy. Presented as a fireside conversation with Chief Alan Perdue , Executive Director, SBC, on the policy environment for in-building wireless, public safety communications, and the FCC priorities shaping the road ahead.Fireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
1:00 to 1:50 PM· Executive SessionPresentationKnowledge Transfer+
Format · BroadcastPresentationSpeakers present, the audience receives. Awareness only unless paired with practice or follow-up.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventExecutive Roundtable: Industry Association Leaders discuss Wireless Tech and PolicyRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventFirst Look Exclusive! A New Training Campus for the Wireless WorkforceTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
4:20 to 5:00 PM· Fireside Chat · Day 1 ClosingFireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventFrom Radios to AI: A Fireside Chat with Col. Jim Wolfinbarger (Ret.)Fireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventOutstanding networking with all speakers and attendees. Passed hors d’oeuvres, beverages, and door prizes. Adult beverages available.NetworkingRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsNetworkingUnstructured mixing. Can carry incidental connection, but is not scored as designed network work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:00 to 9:10 AM· Day 2 OpeningUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:10 to 9:40 AM· Keynote & Q&AKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTJ Kennedy - CEO, GeoComm. Founding President of FirstNet. A former firefighter, paramedic, and state trooper, TJ brings the first-responder’s view of the indoor revolution now underway - school safety laws driving statewide mapping programs, 3D vertical location accuracy, and the data PSAPs now need to answer the most important question: where is the emergency - exactly. Keynote followed by audience Q&A.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:40 to 10:30 AMFinding the Caller: Indoor Location & MappingUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
11:10 AM - 12:00 PMIn-Building & 9-1-1: What PSAPs Need NextUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTodd Piett - Senior VP, Command Center Solutions, Motorola Solutions. West Point honors graduate, Harvard MBA, and former U.S. Army aviation officer, leading the platform behind 9-1-1 call handling, NG9-1-1, CAD, and the cloud that ties emergency response together. Keynote presented as a fireside conversation withLorraine Chambliss, PMP (Director Global Offer Management, Motorola Solutions), on what happens once responders are inside the building.KeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
2:15 to 3:00 PMBeyond Blunt Bans: Could Smarter Infrastructure Solve the School Phone Problem?UnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventClassroom smartphone distraction is real, and blanket cell-phone bans have become the dominant policy response. SBC’s white paper Proposal: School Mode for Cell Phones offers a targeted technology alternative: a “School Mode” for phones. At scale, the approach depends on something that doesn’t yet exist: a consistent geo-library of school perimeters. This panel connects the theoretical value of mapping standards to the real-world case for them. Moderated by Eric Toenjes (Graybar / SBC), with Jason Eyre, CETL (Murray City School District), Brooks Shannon, ENP (Esri), and Dan Craigie (GeoComm).PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
3:00 to 3:10 PMClosing RemarksClosing RemarksOrientation+
Format · BroadcastClosing RemarksClosing framing from the stage. Wraps the event, not participatory.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
3:10 PMAdjournUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
The Full Reading
Why It Ranks This Way +
Calibrated from GES design 37/100 and verified 38/100 with no fourth-loop cap.
Reader Takeaway. For a reader, this is a comparison record more than a model to copy: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in evidence maturity and problem specificity and the biggest open question around follow through and participation architecture. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to execution quality beyond the public agenda.
Strongest signals: Evidence Maturity, Problem Specificity, and Future-of-Work Fit. Weakest signals: Follow Through, Participation Architecture, and Learning Transfer.
How This Agenda Could Improve +
- Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
- Turn passive airtime into participant work: practice, sensemaking, decisions, critique, or artifact creation.
- Build transfer into the agenda through practice, feedback, job aids, reflection, and 30-90 day use cases.
Fastest next move: Add named owners, dated next steps, and a visible continuation path before treating the event as outcome-ready.
Role-Specific Reading +
Sponsor lens
Look beyond exposure. Strong sponsor value would show qualified interaction, problem work, buyer learning, customer evidence, or follow-up. The practical sponsor move is to look for structured introductions, buyer-seller fit, and relationship persistence.
Designer lens
The agenda is useful as a pattern sample from saferbuildings.net. Redesign attention should go first to the lowest-scoring pillars; in practice, turn the thinnest agenda blocks into participant work.
Executive lens
Treat the visible agenda as an operating plan. The executive move is to ask whether the follow-up evidence connects to the business or mission outcome. If owners, proof, and follow-through are not visible, the public record does not yet prove strategic movement.
Aggregator lens
Treat the source URL as evidence, not decoration. The data-product move is to label the source boundary clearly before ranking the record before ranking or syndicating the record.
What GES Means Here +
The Gathering Effectiveness Score is a strict 0-100 public-evidence reading of the agenda across eight pillars. It rewards visible participant work, follow-through, transfer, network design, and proof mechanisms more than polish, speaker fame, attendance, or satisfaction.
Visible mechanisms: Participant work, Follow-up, Impact evidence, Network design, Learning transfer.
Evidence boundary: Scores reflect visible agenda/source evidence and should not be read as proof of causal event impact.
Limitations, Score Caps, and Review Flags +
Limitations
- No baseline measurement is visible.
Score caps
- No fourth-loop score cap applied.
Review flags
- No additional public review flags.
Is this proof the event worked? +
No. This is a strict public-evidence reading of the agenda. Proof would require baseline, comparison, follow-up, attribution, and impact evidence beyond the listing.
What should a reader inspect first? +
Start with the source URL, then compare the eight pillar scores against the agenda rows. The biggest opportunities usually sit in follow-through, evidence maturity, and participant work.
Why publish weak records? +
Weak records are part of the map. They show where public agendas still describe sessions and speakers more often than outcomes, commitments, transfer, or proof.
How should I use the rows? +
Read the agenda rows as the visible design trace: formats, purposes, and evidence labels show what the public source made inspectable, not everything that happened in the room. This is a source-grounded interpretation of the public agenda record, not a copy of the source, and not an endorsement of the event.
Where To Go Next
Compare this agenda against other Unknown events scored on the same eight pillars.