Event owner lens
Use this record to benchmark whether a comparable event makes the work after the room visible. The score is 46/100, so the next move is to benchmark the weakest pillars before repeating the format.
action-oriented convening agenda analysis
2026 Schedule
This action-oriented convening in Unknown shows 80 visible agenda rows from irfsummit.org and scores 46/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Follow Through and Evidence Maturity. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Commitments, Network design, and Learning transfer. Follow-through or tracking is at least visible enough to inspect, though causal proof still depends on stronger evidence. A practical reading: For a reader, this is a useful but still incomplete public example: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in future-of-work fit and learning transfer and the biggest open question around follow through and evidence maturity. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence. This page is an original public-evidence analysis, not a copy of the source agenda or an endorsement of the event. The score places the visible agenda in the moderate design signal band. The strongest visible pillars are Future-of-Work Fit, Learning Transfer, and Network Design; the thinnest visible pillars are Follow Through, Evidence Maturity, and Problem Specificity. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Commitments, Network design, and Learning transfer. The extracted agenda preview includes 80 visible rows. The most common formats are Panel, Demo, and Training; the most common inferred purposes are Deliberation, Showcase, and Skill Building.
Eight-pillar fingerprint
Hover any pillar to see what it measures and, where it scored low, what the agenda is missing.
Participation Architecture?47
Participation Architecture - 47/100. Participant work, contribution, interaction, and alternatives to passive broadcast.
Follow Through?22
Follow Through - 22/100. Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.Missing: Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
Problem Specificity?43
Problem Specificity - 43/100. A clear costly problem, objective, decision, or performance target.Missing: Name the costly problem, decision, or performance target the gathering is meant to move.
Personalization?44
Personalization - 44/100. Role, path, goal, preparation, or connection tailoring for participants.
Network Design?52
Network Design - 52/100. Structured weak ties, bridge-building, mixers, and relationship persistence.
Learning Transfer?57
Learning Transfer - 57/100. Applied practice, feedback, workplace use, refreshers, and 30-90 day transfer.
Evidence Maturity?35
Evidence Maturity - 35/100. Baseline, comparison, follow-up, isolation, and attribution confidence.Missing: Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
Future-of-Work Fit?63
Future-of-Work Fit - 63/100. Value against time, hybrid reality, accessibility, AI, and meeting load.
Fix the gaps
Field-tested exercises matched to this agenda's weakest pillars, from the exercise library.
Follow Through (22/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Mental Toughness Workshop • WorkshopBank · 15% Solutions • WorkshopBank · Network Patches
Problem Specificity (43/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: 0 - “Two Person Scene” Theory · Challenge Axis - Knowmium: The Un-Training Consultancy · Fist to Five • WorkshopBank
Personalization (44/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Journey Mapping • WorkshopBank · Group Energiser & Perspective-Changing Exercise - Paradigm... · Photo Storytelling
Post-event evidence
- Third-party account The blog post provides a summary of the first day of the IRF Summit 2026, highlighting key messages from leaders regarding religious freedom and identifying specific prisoners of conscience. Source ↗
Found by searching the public web for what happened after this gathering, then classified and screened by our pipeline. Evidence labels describe who is making the claim, not whether the event succeeded.
Agenda Preview
The actual agenda we captured. Every block is classified by format and purpose. Open any block to see how we read it; the colored edge shows whether it is participant work, broadcast, logistics, or a showcase.
Room vs wrapper
31 percent of the 80 classified blocks put participants to work; the rest broadcast, show, or handle logistics. That mix is what drives the participation score.
Participant workBroadcastShowcaseLogistics
all eventSpotlights & KeynotesKeynoteThought Leadership+
Format · BroadcastKeynoteA featured talk from the stage. Builds awareness and energy, produces no participant output on its own.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPrioritizing IRF Commitment of Global DemocraciesDemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:45 AMMonday, February 2, 2026 Plenary SessionPresentationKnowledge Transfer+
Format · BroadcastPresentationSpeakers present, the audience receives. Awareness only unless paired with practice or follow-up.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel will explore how democratic nations can make a concrete commitment to promoting and protecting religious freedom globally, ensuring those suffering from persecution feel the tangible benefit of this leadership.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanelistsPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel will provide a strategic analysis of the nexus between religious freedom and global stability. The discussion will investigate how promoting religious freedom contributes to conflict prevention, and conversely, how the suppression of religious freedom fuels global insecurity.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventNicole Bibbins Sedaca is the Kelly and David Pfeil Fellow at the George W. Bush Institute. Bringing her expertise on American foreign policy, US and global democracy issues, freedom, human rights, and leadership, Bibbins Sedaca writes and speaks on behalf of the George W. Bush Institute and serves as faculty in our various leadership programs.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventShe has written on democracy and human rights issues for the Journal for Democracy, CNN.com, Foreign Policy magazine, The Hill, the Dallas Morning News, and many local media outlets, as well as done a TEDX Talk and been interviewed on CBS News, CNN, National Public Radio, the Council on Foreign Relations, and various podcasts and local news outlets.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventBibbins Sedaca has held numerous positions in the public and non-governmental sectors in the United States and Ecuador. She served for ten years in the United States Department of State, working on democracy promotion, human rights, human trafficking, religious freedom, refugees, and counterterrorism. Following her governmental service, she opened and directed the International Republican Institute’s local governance program in Ecuador. She also taught at the Universidad de San Francisco de Quito (Ecuador) on democratization and conflict resolution, and co-led the award-winning USFQ Model United Nations team. Ms. Bibbins Sedaca has served on numerous academic and non-profit boards, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of the International Justice Mission.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventFireside ChatFireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventIRF Summit Co-Chairs Sam Brownback and Katrina Lantos Swett will sit down with Jan Jekielek, Senior Editor with The Epoch Times, for a fireside chat to discuss today’s most pressing issues in the IRF community and their outlook on the movement.Fireside ChatDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastFireside ChatA conversational stage format. Engaging to watch, still a broadcast format for the audience.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel will explore the strategic value of funding programs and initiatives that support religious freedom globally and how such investments are essential to creating the conditions necessary for long-term peace and sustainable development.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventRigas recently served as a senior advisor to the Trump-Vance 2025 transition, overseeing development of federal department and agency action plans and appointee training programs. He also directed the America First Policy Institute’s Presidential Transition Project.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventHe is Chairman of the National Endowment for Democracy Board of Directors and serves on the US Global Leadership Coalition Board of Directors.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventHe was a United States Congressman representing suburban Chicago for twelve years (2007-2019) where he was appointed to the Congressional Leadership and chaired three subcommittees of the Ways and Means Committee. He chaired the US House Democracy Partnership, a bipartisan commission supporting emerging democracies throughout the world; co-chaired the Bipartisan Task Force to Combat Antisemitism; and co-chaired the Korea Caucus and co-chaired the India Caucus. Prior to Congress he served in the Illinois Senate and House of Representatives.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventChairman of the Board, National Endowment for DemocracyDemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:15 AMTuesday, February 3, 2026 Plenary SessionPresentationKnowledge Transfer+
Format · BroadcastPresentationSpeakers present, the audience receives. Awareness only unless paired with practice or follow-up.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel will explore the double challenge faced by victims of religious persecution: being forced to flee their homelands and then continuing to face challenges to exercising their faith, even in exile.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventShe previously served as a member of the OSCE Panel of Experts on Freedom of Religion or Belief (2012-2019). Her Oxford University Press law monograph on freedom of religion or belief (with Heiner Bielefeldt and Michael Wiener) was awarded the Senior Alberigo Prize by the European Academy of Religion and she was awarded the Religious Liberty Prize by Notre Dame University in 2024.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel will explore the troubling rise of transnational repression, where authoritarian governments target citizens in exile - as well as family members who remain in their country of origin - to silence dissent, obstruct human rights reporting, and impact exiled faith communities globally.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventSardar Pashaei is a Kurdish human rights activist, former world wrestling champion, and Executive Director of Hiwa, a U.S.-based organization advocating for justice, equality, and democratic freedoms for persecuted communities, with a particular focus on ethnic minorities, including the Kurdish people. Born in Saqqez, Kurdistan, he rose to prominence as a national and international wrestling champion and later served as head coach of Iran’s national wrestling team. Despite his athletic success, he was barred from international competition and ultimately forced into exile due to ethnic discrimination and his family’s political background.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThrough Hiwa, he builds international coalitions of activists, athletes, and civil society partners to promote accountability, challenge the instrumentalization of sport and culture by authoritarian states, and amplify the voices of communities facing systemic discrimination. His advocacy has been featured by major international media, and he regularly engages policymakers and global forums to advance human rights and democratic accountability.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
10:45 AMMonday, February 2, 2026 Breakout Session 1BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel presents best practices and effective models for collaboration and partnerships that bring together advocates and resources from diverse sectors to defend and promote freedom of religion or belief. Participants will become more aware of the opportunities for networking with participants from diverse sectors during or after the summit.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTo advance the cause of religious freedom, it is critical to nurture the next generation of champions for the cause. This panel explores ways to make cross-generation partnerships work. Youths will gain access to new opportunities and resources while “veterans” will improve their ability to recruit young champions.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Justice Beyond Borders - Advocating for Religious Prisoners of ConsciencePanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
2:00 PMMonday, February 2, 2026 Breakout Session 2BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPractitioners, advocates, and legal experts share their experience and approaches in defending victims of religious persecution and advocating for religious prisoners of conscience. The panel will suggest case-based advocacy strategies, legal tools, and international mechanisms to use in supporting and protecting victims of religious persecution including prisoners of conscience.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Justice Beyond Borders - Protecting the Persecuted on the RunPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPractitioners, humanitarian actors, and policy experts examine the challenges faced by victims of religious persecution on the move, including refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons. Panelists will share practical approaches to protecting and advocating for refugees, asylum seekers, and IDPs, including legal pathways, resettlement processes, and cross-border support mechanisms.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Forging Multi-Faith Partnerships in Our Communities and NationsPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
10:45 AMTuesday, February 3, 2026 Breakout Session 3BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel examines the factors critical to building and growing an alliance of different faiths to advance religious freedom in your own community or across national boundaries. Participants will learn from success stories and shared best practices to address common challenges and overcome particular challenges.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Forging Multi-Faith Partnerships Around the GlobePanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Voices from Underreported Religious Communities Caught Amid ConflictPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Surfacing Stories of Religious PersecutionPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Identifying Red Flags Before Persecution EscalatesPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: When FoRB Red Flags Become NormalizedPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Media, FoRB and Visibility in the Global SouthPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWorkshop: From Reporting to Reach - Increasing Visibility for FoRB IssuesWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Beyond the List - Sanctions, Strategy, and Solutions: Strengthening the Global Accountability Toolkit for Religious FreedomPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel evaluates the global religious freedom toolkit, analyzing the impact of US “CPC” designations and sanctions. Experts will discuss strengthening accountability through a coordinated international defense - aligning European sanctions regimes with innovative regional tools - to build a cohesive, impactful system for deterring systematic religious freedom violations worldwide.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Securing Justice - Using International Criminal Law and Transitional Justice for Religious AtrocitiesPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel examines legal pathways for mass atrocities where religious identity is a primary vector of violence. Experts will evaluate international tribunals, universal jurisdiction, and regional human rights mechanisms. The discussion also addresses the vital role of documentation, truth commissions, and transitional justice in seeking accountability and repair in post-conflict states.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Incentivizing Freedom - Building a Global Accountability Architecture Through Business, Policy, and Collaborative ReformPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis high-level panel explores building a global framework for religious freedom accountability. Moving beyond sanctions, experts will analyze how business, policy, and market incentives - like trade agreements and procurement standards - can reward protection and penalize violations. The goal is a collaborative architecture aligning market forces with evidence-based local change.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: From Local Victories to Global Impact - Connecting Local Advocacy to Global Policy Successes for Religious FreedomPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel explores how grassroots action drives policy change. Using case studies, experts showcase how local advocacy, strategic litigation, and NGO support successfully reversed religious persecution. By analyzing domestic victories and legal challenges against non-state actors, the discussion identifies replicable strategies and the specific sequencing required for profound positive change.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Digital Frontiers and Algorithmic Bias - Next-Gen Accountability in the Information AgePanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel explores digital accountability in the face of tech-driven religious persecution. Experts will dissect how AI surveillance and propaganda incite violence, while analyzing legal gaps that allow actor impunity. The discussion focuses on solutions, including corporate accountability, blockchain for evidence storage, and international frameworks to monitor digital hate campaigns.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: The Law of Conscience - Ensuring Safe Return and Property Restoration for Religious CommunitiesPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis panel explores restorative justice models to address systemic persecution, including mass displacement and heritage destruction. Experts will discuss healing-centered mechanisms such as international restitution funds, legal frameworks for property return, and culturally sensitive truth-telling commissions. The goal is to move beyond individual prosecution toward long-term repair and coexistence.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTugba Erdemir, IRF Roundtable Middle East Working GroupRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventDuring the breakout tracks, Summit attendees will have the opportunity to attend specialized trainings designed to help them advance their religious freedom work.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTraining: Navigating International Human Rights Mechanisms to Advance Freedom of BeliefTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWhen domestic legal systems fail to protect against human rights violations, international and regional mechanisms can offer critical avenues for accountability, advocacy, and justice. But it can be challenging to navigate these mechanisms. In this workshop,members of the Human Rights Foundation’s Legal Team will provide guidance and practical examples that will help civil society actors understand and effectively engage with the mechanisms available to them to advance the cause of freedom of belief.WorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTraining: Preventing Burnout and Sustaining Wellbeing in Religious Freedom AdvocacyTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventActivism is a demanding endeavor that takes a toll on physical, emotional, and mental wellbeing. In this training, Dr. Vanina Waizmann explores the impact of chronic stress, persecution, and secondary trauma on those defending religious freedom, offering trauma-informed tools to prevent burnout and sustain long-term engagement.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTraining: Beyond Digital Hygiene: Practical Security Skills for Activists, Organizers, and MovementsTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventIn an era of increasing digital surveillance and online repression, this session equips individuals and organizations with practical tools to protect their work. This training, led by digital resilience and cybersecurity specialist Sarah Moulton, will move beyond basic digital hygiene to offer guidance on encrypted communications, navigating internet censorship, and strengthening online anonymity through actionable best practices.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPelosi is the chief architect of generation-defining legislation under two Democratic administrations, including the Affordable Care Act and the American Rescue Plan. She led House Democrats for 20 years and previously served as House Democratic Whip. In 2013, she was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame at a ceremony in Seneca Falls, the birthplace of the American women’s rights movement. In 2024, she was awarded by President Biden the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventSam Azkul, MD, is a Druze American physician and human rights advocate committed to democracy, peace, women’s rights, and economic development. He is a strong supporter of the Druze community and a defender of minority rights, religious freedom, and pluralism. Dr. Azkul has a focused interest in U.S. national security and the protection of democratic institutions from jihadist and other extremist ideologies. He advocates for lawful, evidence-based strategies to counter radicalization, protect civil liberties, and prevent extremist influence on democratic processes. He currently presides over the American Alliance for a Democratic Syria and serves as a board member of Druze Nexus, which focuses on economic development in minority areas.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventAram Vardevanyan, PhD, born on November 1, 1989, in Yerevan, is a well known Armenian attorney, scholar, and public figure whose professional life is dedicated to democratic values, human rights promotion, religious freedom, and the protection of fundamental rights. He is a committed follower and strong supporter of the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church. Guided by Christian values of justice, mercy, and truth, Aram Vardevanyan consistently views the protection of human rights the top priority of his professional activities.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventAs a Christian leader, Bishop Dr. Paul Murray is a well-received global speaker and minister known for his servant leadership traits and call for moral and innovative leadership. Dr. Murray is a passionate advocate for religious freedom and human rights. He is a powerful, articulate, and anointed speaker at conferences and presenter on international program panels where he addresses the ongoing global human rights challenges impacting the many who seek to live and practice their religion or belief freely. He presents values-based peacebuilding concepts to aid in resolving inter-religious, societal, and governmental conflicts.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThrough his development and implementation of educational, outreach, and advocacy projects, Dr. Murray continues expanding his global network of partners and advocates who represent grassroots community organizations, academia, NGOs, and government officials. In addition, Dr. Murray serves as vice chairman of the International Religious Freedom Secretariat (IRFSec), assisting in establishing regional and country-based IRF Roundtables and summits.RoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventSunday 2/1 Opening ReceptionReceptionRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsReceptionA social or hospitality block. Pacing and informal connection, not participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
6:00pmSunday IRF Summit Opening Reception (Invite Only)ReceptionRelationship Building+
Format · LogisticsReceptionA social or hospitality block. Pacing and informal connection, not participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
8:00amMonday Registration Opens (All Day)RegistrationLogistics+
Format · LogisticsRegistrationCheck-in and logistics, not agenda content.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
8:30amMonday Coffee with USCIRF CommissionersBreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
9:45amMonday Plenary Session 1PresentationKnowledge Transfer+
Format · BroadcastPresentationSpeakers present, the audience receives. Awareness only unless paired with practice or follow-up.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Prioritizing IRF Commitment of GlobalPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventDemocraciesDemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
10:45amMonday Breakout Session 1BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Collaboration that Works - Linking SectorsPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Collaboration that Works - Bridging GenerationsPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Voices from Underreported ReligiousPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Beyond the List - Sanctions, Strategy,PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanel: Securing Justice - Using International CriminalPanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventTraining: Navigating International Human RightsTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
2:00pmMonday Breakout Session 2BreakWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsBreakA pacing or recovery block between sessions.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
The Full Reading
Why It Ranks This Way +
Calibrated from GES design 46/100 and verified 45/100 with no fourth-loop cap.
Reader Takeaway. For a reader, this is a useful but still incomplete public example: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in future-of-work fit and learning transfer and the biggest open question around follow through and evidence maturity. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence.
Strongest signals: Future-of-Work Fit, Learning Transfer, and Network Design. Weakest signals: Follow Through, Evidence Maturity, and Problem Specificity.
How This Agenda Could Improve +
- Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
- Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
- Name the costly problem, decision, or performance target the gathering is meant to move.
Fastest next move: Add named owners, dated next steps, and a visible continuation path before treating the event as outcome-ready.
Role-Specific Reading +
Sponsor lens
Look beyond exposure. Strong sponsor value would show qualified interaction, problem work, buyer learning, customer evidence, or follow-up. The practical sponsor move is to look for structured introductions, buyer-seller fit, and relationship persistence.
Designer lens
The agenda is useful as a pattern sample from irfsummit.org. Redesign attention should go first to the lowest-scoring pillars; in practice, turn the thinnest agenda blocks into participant work.
Executive lens
Treat the visible agenda as an operating plan. The executive move is to require owners, dates, and evidence before treating the event as strategic. If owners, proof, and follow-through are not visible, the public record does not yet prove strategic movement.
Aggregator lens
Treat the source URL as evidence, not decoration. The data-product move is to label the source boundary clearly before ranking the record before ranking or syndicating the record.
What GES Means Here +
The Gathering Effectiveness Score is a strict 0-100 public-evidence reading of the agenda across eight pillars. It rewards visible participant work, follow-through, transfer, network design, and proof mechanisms more than polish, speaker fame, attendance, or satisfaction.
Visible mechanisms: Participant work, Commitments, Network design, Learning transfer.
Evidence boundary: Scores reflect visible agenda/source evidence and should not be read as proof of causal event impact.
Limitations, Score Caps, and Review Flags +
Limitations
- No baseline measurement is visible.
Score caps
- No fourth-loop score cap applied.
Review flags
- Satisfaction/NPS signal found, but it is excluded from effectiveness scoring.
Is this proof the event worked? +
No. This is a strict public-evidence reading of the agenda. Proof would require baseline, comparison, follow-up, attribution, and impact evidence beyond the listing.
What should a reader inspect first? +
Start with the source URL, then compare the eight pillar scores against the agenda rows. The biggest opportunities usually sit in follow-through, evidence maturity, and participant work.
Why publish weak records? +
Weak records are part of the map. They show where public agendas still describe sessions and speakers more often than outcomes, commitments, transfer, or proof.
How should I use the rows? +
Read the agenda rows as the visible design trace: formats, purposes, and evidence labels show what the public source made inspectable, not everything that happened in the room. This is a source-grounded interpretation of the public agenda record, not a copy of the source, and not an endorsement of the event.
Embed the verified badge +
This record is in the hand-verified gold set. Copy the snippet below to embed the verified badge on your own site.
<a href="https://unitedwetransform.com/events/evt_2026_irfsummit_org_2026_schedule_2026_schedule_irfsummit_org"><img src="https://unitedwetransform.com/badge/ges-verified.svg" alt="GES verified by United We Transform" height="40"></a>Where To Go Next
Compare this agenda against other Unknown events scored on the same eight pillars.