Event owner lens
Use this record to benchmark whether a comparable event makes the work after the room visible. The score is 53/100, so the next move is to benchmark the weakest pillars before repeating the format.
action-oriented convening agenda analysis
2026 Equal Justice Conference: Schedule - 2026 Equal Justice Conference - Learn more here. - 2022
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 37 visible agenda rows from americanbar.org and scores 53/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Follow Through and Evidence Maturity. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Commitments, Feedback, and Network design. Follow-through or tracking is at least visible enough to inspect, though causal... A practical reading: For a reader, this is a useful but still incomplete public example: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in participation architecture and learning transfer and the biggest open question around follow through and evidence maturity. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence. This page is an original public-evidence analysis, not a copy of the source agenda or an endorsement of the event. The score places the visible agenda in the promising but still evidence-limited design band. The strongest visible pillars are Participation Architecture, Learning Transfer, and Network Design; the thinnest visible pillars are Follow Through, Evidence Maturity, and Problem Specificity. Visible mechanisms include Participant work, Commitments, Feedback, Network design, and Learning transfer. The extracted agenda preview includes 49 visible rows. The most common formats are Panel, Workshop, and Roundtable; the most common inferred purposes are Deliberation, Co Creation, and Participant Work.
Eight-pillar fingerprint
Hover any pillar to see what it measures and, where it scored low, what the agenda is missing.
Participation Architecture?98
Participation Architecture - 98/100. Participant work, contribution, interaction, and alternatives to passive broadcast.
Follow Through?16
Follow Through - 16/100. Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.Missing: Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
Problem Specificity?39
Problem Specificity - 39/100. A clear costly problem, objective, decision, or performance target.Missing: Name the costly problem, decision, or performance target the gathering is meant to move.
Personalization?50
Personalization - 50/100. Role, path, goal, preparation, or connection tailoring for participants.
Network Design?60
Network Design - 60/100. Structured weak ties, bridge-building, mixers, and relationship persistence.
Learning Transfer?62
Learning Transfer - 62/100. Applied practice, feedback, workplace use, refreshers, and 30-90 day transfer.
Evidence Maturity?31
Evidence Maturity - 31/100. Baseline, comparison, follow-up, isolation, and attribution confidence.Missing: Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
Future-of-Work Fit?43
Future-of-Work Fit - 43/100. Value against time, hybrid reality, accessibility, AI, and meeting load.
Fix the gaps
Field-tested exercises matched to this agenda's weakest pillars, from the exercise library.
Follow Through (16/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Mental Toughness Workshop • WorkshopBank · 15% Solutions • WorkshopBank · Network Patches
Problem Specificity (39/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: 0 - “Two Person Scene” Theory · Challenge Axis - Knowmium: The Un-Training Consultancy · Fist to Five • WorkshopBank
Personalization (50/100)
Exercises that strengthen it: Journey Mapping • WorkshopBank · Group Energiser & Perspective-Changing Exercise - Paradigm... · Photo Storytelling
Agenda Preview
The actual agenda we captured. Every block is classified by format and purpose. Open any block to see how we read it; the colored edge shows whether it is participant work, broadcast, logistics, or a showcase.
Room vs wrapper
57 percent of the 49 classified blocks put participants to work; the rest broadcast, show, or handle logistics. That mix is what drives the participation score.
Participant workBroadcastShowcaseLogistics
all eventWorkshop Sessions A-EWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventWorkshop Sessions F-KWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventWorkshop Sessions L-OWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventWorkshop Sessions P-SWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventWorkshop Sessions T-ZWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all event2022 Equal Justice Conference WorkshopsWorkshopParticipant work+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
7:10Opening Plenary begins at the markOpeningOrientation+
Format · BroadcastOpeningFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisNo participant output visible from this rowRead from source, no work signal
all eventAwards Ceremony and Luncheon - begins at the :54 markMealPacing+
Format · LogisticsMealA pacing block. Can carry unstructured networking, not scored as participant work.
Evidence basisOutcome inferred from formatInferred from format
all eventHelping the Helpers: Tech and Training Strategies to Support Community Justice PartnersTrainingSkill building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventMIE Roundtable for Executive Directors and Program LeadersRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventParalegal Pro Bono Roundtable: A Discussion of Utilization of Paralegals to Assist Attorneys with Pro BonoRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventState Legislative Funding RoundtableRoundtableDiscussion+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisParticipant work is implied by the formatInferred from format
all eventWorkshop Sessions A-EWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWorkshop Sessions F-KWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWorkshop Sessions L-OWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWorkshop Sessions P-SWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWorkshop Sessions T-ZWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all event2022 Equal Justice Conference WorkshopsWorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
7:10 Opening Plenary begins at the markUnknownUnknown+
Format · BroadcastUnknownFormat not classified from the source; treated as a broadcast block by default.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventAwards Ceremony and Luncheon - begins at the :54 markMealWellbeing+
Format · LogisticsMealA pacing block. Can carry unstructured networking, not scored as participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventNearly one in three people in the U.S. have a criminal record. As people with criminal records seek to re-enter society, they often encounter significant barriers to finding jobs. This panel will equip participants to identify and holistically address systemic employment barriers faced by people with criminal records in under-resourced and rural communities. Participants will also learn strategies for building effective partnerships between legal service providers, community-based organizations (CBOs), and other stakeholders with the underlying goal of providing holistic, trauma-informed services to this population.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe Legal Services Corporation analyzed effective practices for pro bono eviction defense programs in a year-long study focusing on the eviction crisis in the United States. Join this discussion with pro bono professionals to learn about partnerships to expand legal representation in this urgent, yet traditionally challenging, area for pro bono delivery. Panelists will discuss the strategic ways in which pro bono practitioners are addressing the evictions crisis and the factors stakeholders should consider in order to accomplish this work effectively.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventCOVID-19 created a digital divide disproportionately impacting rural and native communities and exacerbating access issues. This session explores challenges and opportunities in creating partnerships and developing a human-centered model for service delivery by leveraging technology to create more access points in both rural and urban locations. Reach Justice Minnesota initiatives, in which Minnesota legal aid programs launched a statewide network of legal kiosks and mobile legal aid offices with federal pandemic relief dollars, will be discussed and analyzed by panelists. This session will also explore how human-centered approaches informed the design of these initiatives.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventLaw firms are increasingly using legal tech to better serve their clients. This technological know-how is also being brought to bear to better serve pro bono clients and collaborate with legal services providers. This panel will demonstrate how chat bots, collaboration platforms, and intake portals are enhancing pro bono projects.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis session will look at how a community can come together and collaborate in response to a civil crisis through the lens of the Minneapolis - St.Paul response to the riots that destroyed thousands of small businesses. The response brought together pro bono, nonprofits and governmental agencies to coordinate efforts to rebuild. Panelists will discuss how relationships within the community served as a foundation for successful integration of services.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis session will discuss the myriad ways in which legal services organizations work with law schools to spark student commitment to public service. Panelists will offer practical tips about how to access available resources and expand your touchpoints with law students to help recruit and train the next generation of public interest lawyers to close the justice gap.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventNonprofit legal aid organizations face an increasing risk of cybersecurity threats, including data breaches, fraudulent fund transfers, and ransomware attacks. Don’t wait until your systems are compromised - learn what you need to have in place to prepare and protect your organization, including policies, training, and best practices.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis session is designed to build on the workshops we have done for the past few years on how to explain legal aid as constituent services to legislators and their staff. Now that many LSC grantees and other legal aid programs have begun to develop relationships with their federal and state legislators and staff, we want to identify ways to build on and expand those connections, e.g., provide trainings for district caseworkers; involve legislative staff in community outreach efforts. The panel will include LSC grantee Executive Directors and civil legal aid practitioners with experience meeting with and educating federal and state legislators and their staff both in person and virtually. The panel will also address compliance with LSC lobbying restrictions applicable to LSC grantees in communicating with legislators.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventMillions of people around the country are above the income eligibility line for legal aid yet still struggle to find affordable legal help when they need it. This panel will feature three promising models for helping to close that gap--a legal aid program, a nonprofit law firm, and a network of socially conscious private law firms - along with lessons learned along the way and some common principles and practices they are using that can easily be adapted by other programs.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventMental health issues impact a large portion of our population. For indigent clients who lack resources to healthcare, a stable income, and a safety net, mental health disabilities can be particularly debilitating and prevent an individual from getting back on their feet. Pro bono advocates can make a tremendous difference for clients living with several mental health disabilities by removing legal obstacles to living a safe and stable life. This workshop will offer an overview of mental health and the issues faced by clients, strategies for connecting clients with the right pro bono partner, and best practices so pro bono can provide effective advocacy and achieve great outcomes.WorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventHelping the Helpers: Tech and Training Strategies to Support Community Justice PartnersTrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventManaging emails, recruiting volunteers and also maintaining internal/external relationships can lead to stress and anxiety, with many leaders pushing ourselves emotionally and physically. This interactive panel will provide everyday tips on ways to manage the new normal in order to better manage our lives so we can continue to help others.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventIt is often heard that "standards are like toothbrushes, a good idea but no one wants to use anyone else's." However, if we want technology to fulfill its potential value and create meaningful scale, reach and quality, our approach to creating and adopting standards needs to change. The panel will explore new standards developed by the OASIS Litigant Portal Technical Committee designed to simplify data exchange among providers to improve outcomes and save resources. Also, they will discuss issues surrounding the exchange of data, data retention, and privacy concerns.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe Legal Navigator portal is a positive step forward for programs and states with less resources to create a simple and easy to use platform which integrates artificial intelligence to identify a legal problem, guided assistants to help users create a personalized action plan to know what steps they need to take, and legal and organizational information. This session will demonstrate the launched model and share lessons learned and how other states can utilize the platform for their own sites.DemoShowcase+
Format · Participant workDemoA hands-on or applied walkthrough that invites attendee questions and direct engagement.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis session will give participants tools to increase their organizations' capability to provide culturally competent legal services for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) clients in rural communities. Panelists will share practical strategies for outreach, intake, case management, and capacity building.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventMIE Roundtable for Executive Directors and Program LeadersRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThe Roundtable is an MIE hallmark activity providing Executive Directors and program leaders the opportunity to share management concerns and receive peer support and assistance in an informal and confidential setting. Bring your most difficult challenges and benefit from the best thinking of your colleagues who have similar decisions to make, and experiences to share. This session will be facilitated by members of the MIE Board of DirectorsRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPanelists and participants will discuss how the prospect of mass eviction during and following the pandemic prompted legislative, judicial, and regulatory reform in their states. The conversation will cover what and how changes were made and whether they will stick.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventParalegal Pro Bono Roundtable: A Discussion of Utilization of Paralegals to Assist Attorneys with Pro BonoRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventHear leaders from the National Federation of Paralegal Associations, Inc. discuss key roles paralegals may play in the effective delivery of pro bono legal services. From staffing on specific cases and projects to licensure of paraprofessionals for particular practice areas and tasks, the panel will discuss how paralegals currently, and will in the future, provide a crucial link in bridging the justice gap.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventFTC staff will discuss cases where the conduct either specifically targeted or disproportionately impacted communities of color and new research that reveals the types of concerns these communities are reporting to the FTC. The panel will also share how anyone can help by amplifying consumer protection messages in communities of color.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventResearchers will present nine years of data from the Shriver pilot projects that illustrate eviction trends over time across six counties, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and innovative service approaches implemented by legal aid and the courts. Panelists will ground the data in programmatic realities and discuss takeaways from the evaluation of the data.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventWhen creating training modules for new hires, legal aid and pro bono organizations often provide an overview of administrative procedures and substantive legal foundations. What if all legal aid and pro bono attorneys were first trained in antiracism and trauma-informed practices? This session will highlight the work that legal aid law firms cans engage in to further equal justice not only for our client communities but within our own organizations. This session will be a dynamic introduction to antiracist lawyering and trauma-informed advocacy, and will share perspectives and examples of why this work is critical for access to justice.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventLocal courts and administrative tribunals often fail at providing due process, particularly to marginalized litigants. Promoting access to justice requires strategic advocacy, beyond defensive litigation. Participants will discuss barriers (lack of training, bias) and approaches to systemic change.TrainingSkill Building+
Format · Participant workTrainingGuided skill building where participants practice. Counts as participant work and learning transfer.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventState Legislative Funding RoundtableRoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis interactive session will include reports on developments related to state legislative funding initiatives aimed at increasing resources for civil legal aid. Updates will be provided on the ABA's data collection process to support funding efforts and on potential federal funding, including COVID-19 relief funding, that might be available at the state or local advocacy levels. Participants will be able to share developments in their states in a roundtable format and learn from others about what has worked, and what has not worked, in raising state legislative funding and accessing potential federal funding.RoundtableDeliberation+
Format · Participant workRoundtableSmall-group discussion where attendees contribute directly rather than only listening.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventThis session will explore lessons learned from an innovative collaboration between Harvard Law School’s Veterans Legal Clinic, Connecticut Veterans Legal Center, and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual) to expand legal services to veterans in rural communities. Panelists will highlight strategies for corporate engagement and multidisciplinary pro bono teams and provide takeaways for replicable strategies that attendees can employ for subject matter areas beyond assisting veterans.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventUsing interactive techniques such as participant polling, panelists will (1) share tools for identifying policies that perpetuate racial disparities in water access, (2) discuss legal strategies for addressing those impacts, ranging from Fair Housing litigation to human rights advocacy, and (3) explore alternative policy approaches that promote greater water justice.PanelDeliberation+
Format · BroadcastPanelExperts discuss while the audience watches. Surfaces perspective but rarely creates participant work.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
all eventPeople need help to get a fresh start in a bankruptcy case. Legal services programs have a surprising variety of ways to help, often by partnering with pro bono counsel. This interactive workshop brings together lawyers who provide this service and those who are considering doing so.WorkshopCo Creation+
Format · Participant workWorkshopParticipants work on a problem and produce something. The strongest signal of participation architecture.
Evidence basisMediumRead from source
The Full Reading
Why It Ranks This Way +
Calibrated from GES design 51/100 and verified 50/100 with no fourth-loop cap.
Reader Takeaway. For a reader, this is a useful but still incomplete public example: it reads as an action-oriented convening, with the strongest visible signal in participation architecture and learning transfer and the biggest open question around follow through and evidence maturity. The practical test is whether the published agenda connects the room to post-event continuation and evidence.
Strongest signals: Participation Architecture, Learning Transfer, and Network Design. Weakest signals: Follow Through, Evidence Maturity, and Problem Specificity.
How This Agenda Could Improve +
- Add named owners, dates, implementation checkpoints, and a visible post-event continuation path.
- Add baseline measurement, comparison logic, tracking, or post-event impact reporting so effectiveness is not inferred only from format.
- Name the costly problem, decision, or performance target the gathering is meant to move.
Fastest next move: Add named owners, dated next steps, and a visible continuation path before treating the event as outcome-ready.
Role-Specific Reading +
Sponsor lens
Look beyond exposure. Strong sponsor value would show qualified interaction, problem work, buyer learning, customer evidence, or follow-up. The practical sponsor move is to look for structured introductions, buyer-seller fit, and relationship persistence.
Designer lens
The agenda is useful as a pattern sample from americanbar.org. Redesign attention should go first to the lowest-scoring pillars; in practice, turn the thinnest agenda blocks into participant work.
Executive lens
Treat the visible agenda as an operating plan. The executive move is to require owners, dates, and evidence before treating the event as strategic. If owners, proof, and follow-through are not visible, the public record does not yet prove strategic movement.
Aggregator lens
Treat the source URL as evidence, not decoration. The data-product move is to label the source boundary clearly before ranking the record before ranking or syndicating the record.
What GES Means Here +
The Gathering Effectiveness Score is a strict 0-100 public-evidence reading of the agenda across eight pillars. It rewards visible participant work, follow-through, transfer, network design, and proof mechanisms more than polish, speaker fame, attendance, or satisfaction.
Visible mechanisms: Participant work, Commitments, Feedback, Network design, Learning transfer, Personalization.
Evidence boundary: Scores reflect visible agenda/source evidence and should not be read as proof of causal event impact.
Limitations, Score Caps, and Review Flags +
Limitations
- No baseline measurement is visible.
Score caps
- No fourth-loop score cap applied.
Review flags
- No tracking, validation, feedback, or impact measurement found in the visible source text.
- High cleanup rate: many extracted rows were hidden or merged as fragments.
- Original category was unknown; publication category is inferred.
Is this proof the event worked? +
No. This is a strict public-evidence reading of the agenda. Proof would require baseline, comparison, follow-up, attribution, and impact evidence beyond the listing.
What should a reader inspect first? +
Start with the source URL, then compare the eight pillar scores against the agenda rows. The biggest opportunities usually sit in follow-through, evidence maturity, and participant work.
Why publish weak records? +
Weak records are part of the map. They show where public agendas still describe sessions and speakers more often than outcomes, commitments, transfer, or proof.
How should I use the rows? +
Read the agenda rows as the visible design trace: formats, purposes, and evidence labels show what the public source made inspectable, not everything that happened in the room. This is a source-grounded interpretation of the public agenda record, not a copy of the source, and not an endorsement of the event.
Embed the verified badge +
This record is in the hand-verified gold set. Copy the snippet below to embed the verified badge on your own site.
<a href="https://unitedwetransform.com/events/evt_2026_2026_equal_justice_conference_schedule_2026_equal_justice_conference_learn_d3ca41"><img src="https://unitedwetransform.com/badge/ges-verified.svg" alt="GES verified by United We Transform" height="40"></a>Where To Go Next
Compare this agenda against other Technology / AI / Startup events scored on the same eight pillars.