Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 6812d835bf5eee7d5d9ad19339671a58479f90cd9e1591d5874b41395d1bbf6c

# Red:Green Cards

Participants use colored cards to signal agreement, objection, or readiness in real time. The facilitator scans visible signals to decide whether to advance or pause for discussion.

**Time:** 10 minutes. A single prompt takes under 1 minute; 10 minutes allows introduction, 2 to 3 test checks, and a brief debrief.
**People:** 4 to 24. Whole group responding simultaneously from their seats.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Gauge group sentiment and consensus instantaneously without sequential speaking.
**Use it when:** Use during presentations, proposals, or decision points when you need immediate whole-room alignment before proceeding.
**Skip it when:** Skip when a decision requires anonymous voting, detailed legal review, or when the group has unaddressed power dynamics that make public dissent unsafe.

## Materials and tools

- 1 red index card (or printed paper card) per participant
- 1 green index card (or printed paper card) per participant
- Optional: 1 yellow card per participant for neutral stance
- Optional: 1 gray card per participant for confusion

## Before participants arrive

1. Place one red card and one green card at each participant seat before the session begins.
2. Prepare the specific check-in question or proposal statement in advance.

## Say this to open

We will use red and green cards for quick check-ins today. Green means yes, agreement, or ready to move forward. Red means no, an objection, or a need to stop and clarify. When I ask a check question, raise one card high so we can see the room at a glance.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce card meanings (2 minutes)

Distribute or point out the red and green cards. Explain the core definitions: green signifies consent, approval, or ready to advance; red signifies an objection, disagreement, or a call to stop. Run a neutral test prompt such as 'Are you ready to test the cards?' so everyone raises one card.

### 2. Call a substantive check (2 minutes)

State the actual proposal or checkpoint clearly. For example: 'Have we covered this topic sufficiently to move to the next agenda item?' Ask all participants to raise their chosen card simultaneously on the count of three.

### 3. Acknowledge and address red signals (4 minutes)

Scan the room. If all cards are green, state the consensus and advance immediately. If red cards appear, invite up to two people holding red cards to state their objection or question in one or two sentences. If anyone prefers not to speak, they may keep their card raised while someone else speaks or pass to the next volunteer.

### 4. Confirm resolution and close check (2 minutes)

After hearing the brief input, answer the question or adjust the item. Call for a final simultaneous card raise to verify whether the room is ready to proceed, then conduct a short debrief on the signaling method.


## Debrief questions

- How did seeing everyone's card at once change the speed of our decision?
- Did you feel comfortable raising a red card when you disagreed?
- What is one topic later today where using these cards will save time?

**Finished output:** An immediate visual tally of group consent and documented resolution of voiced objections.

## Remote

In video calls, participants use chat shortcuts (typing 'GREEN' or 'RED'), built-in emoji reactions (green check or red X), or hold colored physical cards up to their webcams on a count of three. The facilitator scans gallery view or chat logs.

## Hybrid

In-person attendees raise their physical cards while remote participants submit the designated emoji or colored indicator in the chat at the same count of three. A co-facilitator or designated monitor announces the remote tally aloud so the whole room is aware.

## Access and participation choices

- Cards should have the words YES/GO printed on green and NO/STOP printed on red to accommodate color vision deficiencies.
- Participants may keep cards flat on the table to pass or decline to vote without verbal disclosure.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants hesitate to raise red cards because leaders or managers are in the room.**

Remind the room that red cards simply mean 'pause for clarification,' not personal conflict. Invite an open clarifying question rather than a defense.

**A participant uses red to start an extended, off-topic debate.**

Set a strict one-minute timer for the objection. Note the issue on a visible parking lot if it cannot be resolved inside the immediate decision scope.


## Terms used here

- Consensus check: A quick visual inquiry to see if everyone can live with a proposal and move forward.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Gamestorming; Gamestorming attributes the method to Jerry Michalski.

Retained the primary card mechanic and Jerry Michalski's attribution from the Gamestorming source text. Structured into a repeatable 10-minute facilitated drill with specific scripts, timing, hybrid accommodations, and color-blind accessible labels.

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/redgreen-cards)

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/redgreen-cards/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/red-green-cards/