Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 034fcd705d26fa437eaae6d9faa1231423fa1b5a5da57fa2283c1f6846e97d25

# Problem Solving Team Building (PSTB)

A team helps a single problem owner solve an operational challenge through rapid idea generation, owner selection, concern analysis, and targeted action planning.

**Time:** 35 minutes. Extended to 35 minutes from the source 30-minute baseline to allow realistic resolution of key concerns during action planning.
**People:** 4 to 10. Single plenary semi-circle with three distinct roles: one problem owner, one facilitator and scribe, and two to eight team contributors.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Produce a prioritized, actionable implementation plan for a designated problem owner within an agreed time contract.
**Use it when:** Use when an individual owns a complex operational problem and needs structured team input without circular, unstructured debate.
**Skip it when:** Skip when the issue lacks a single accountable decision-maker, when root causes remain entirely unexamined, or when plenary group size exceeds 10 people.

## Materials and tools

- 1 flipchart easel with pad
- 4 dark chisel-tip marker pens
- 1 roll of painter's tape or adhesive putty
- Chairs arranged in an open semi-circle facing the flipchart
- 1 digital countdown timer
- Video meeting platform with shared digital whiteboard (for remote delivery)
- Room camera, display screen, and web-connected laptop for digital scribing (for hybrid delivery)

## Before participants arrive

1. Arrange chairs in an open semi-circle facing the presentation wall without intervening tables.
2. Post two blank flipchart sheets side-by-side: sheet 1 titled 'Ideas' and sheet 2 divided into three vertical columns titled 'Benefits', 'Concerns', and 'Actions'.
3. Confirm beforehand that the designated problem owner has prepared an operational challenge framed as a root cause issue.

## Say this to open

Welcome. We have 35 minutes to tackle one challenge using the Problem Solving Team Building method. Our roles are strictly separated. Our problem owner defines the challenge and holds final decision authority. I will track our time contract and scribe all notes onto the charts. The rest of you serve as the consulting team. We will move rapidly through six stages: framing the question, open ideation, owner selection, benefits and concerns, critical checks, and concrete action planning. Keep all contributions to concise headlines and respect the timer.

## How to run it

### 1. Frame the problem statement (4 minutes)

The problem owner reads the challenge aloud as a single question starting with 'How do I...?' and provides two minutes of core context. The facilitator scribes the exact question at the top of the flipchart. Neutral example: 'How do I reduce client onboarding drop-offs during the first two weeks?' Team members may ask up to two clarifying factual questions. No debate or proposed solutions are allowed during this stage.

### 2. Generate rapid brainstorm ideas (6 minutes)

Team members call out concise headline ideas. The problem owner listens silently without commenting, defending, or reacting. The facilitator scribes every suggestion onto sheet 1 ('Ideas'). Aim for volume without critique. The step ends strictly when the timer sounds.

### 3. Select priority ideas (3 minutes)

The problem owner reviews the posted list and circles between 1 and 3 options to pursue. The consulting team remains silent. The problem owner does not need to justify their selection or choose the most popular suggestions.

### 4. Assess benefits and concerns (6 minutes)

Focusing solely on the circled options, the problem owner speaks first, stating their immediate pros and cons. The team then offers additional benefits and practical concerns. The facilitator logs these in the 'Benefits' and 'Concerns' columns on sheet 2. Comments must address only the selected ideas; no one may lobby for unselected items.

### 5. Check critical concerns (3 minutes)

The facilitator tests each recorded concern against fatal flaw criteria: 'Is this issue so fatal and beyond our control that no planned mitigation can overcome it?' If an unresolvable fatal flaw exists, the owner strikes that idea. If the concern can be mitigated, it stays in the queue for immediate action planning.

### 6. Build concrete action steps (13 minutes)

The group addresses the top identified concerns for each chosen idea. For each concern, the team defines a specific mitigation task, an assigned task lead, and a target date. Once top concerns are mitigated, the group adds standard baseline implementation steps. The facilitator records the resulting action matrix on sheet 2 while the problem owner verbally confirms commitments.


## Debrief questions

- To the problem owner: How did remaining silent during ideation affect the breadth of options you received?
- To the team: How did addressing specific operational concerns before planning general tasks alter your confidence in the solution?
- To the group: Which single action on the board is the critical first step to execute tomorrow morning?

**Finished output:** A completed action matrix mapping identified operational concerns to explicit mitigation tasks, assigned owners, and target completion dates.

## Remote

Conduct via video call with a shared digital canvas. The canvas displays two boards: 'Ideas' and 'Analysis & Actions'. The problem owner mutes their microphone during step 2 while participants post headline sticky notes. In step 3, the owner places digital star markers on 1 to 3 items. The facilitator runs an on-screen timer and scribes the agreed actions into a shared digital table.

## Hybrid

In-person participants sit facing the physical flipchart and room camera. Remote participants appear on the room display screen. The facilitator or a designated digital scribe mirrors all flipchart notes directly onto a live shared document so remote attendees can read text instantaneously. Alternate speaking turns between remote and room contributors during ideation and concern logging.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may submit headline ideas and concerns in writing via index cards, digital chat, or sticky notes instead of speaking aloud.
- Any participant may pass during open rounds without providing an explanation.

## If the session gets stuck

**The problem owner starts debating or dismissing ideas during the brainstorming step.**

Intervene immediately and pause the timer: 'You hold complete authority to select or reject ideas in step 3. Right now, your only job is listening while we gather raw material.'

**Team members lobby to resurrect an unselected idea during the benefits and concerns step.**

Refocus the room on the owner's choices: 'Our contract requires that we test only the directions selected by the owner. Keep all input focused exclusively on these circled items.'

**Too many concerns are logged to resolve within the remaining action planning time.**

Instruct the problem owner to point out the two most severe concerns per chosen idea. Solve those immediately on the chart, and log remaining minor risks for follow-up review.


## Terms used here

- Time contract: An explicit commitment agreed upon at the start of a session to follow rigid stage durations without running over.
- Problem owner: The specific individual who holds operational accountability and decision authority to implement changes for the targeted challenge.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in WorkshopBank as 'Problem Solving Team Building' (PSTB). WorkshopBank does not identify an external original author.

Retained the 6-phase sequence, strict role divisions (owner, facilitator, team), headline rule, and concern-first action planning logic from WorkshopBank. UWT adjusted the total duration from 30 to 35 minutes, expanding step 6 from 8 to 13 minutes to allow practical assignment of tasks and owners. UWT also clarified the facilitator's consistent role as scribe and added hybrid/remote tooling specifications.

[WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/problem-solving-team-building)

[WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/tools/problem-solving-team-building)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/problem-solving-team-building-workshopbank/