United We TransformCreate teamsGrade your agenda
Exercises/Reflection and Learning/Proud and Sorry
Team Reflection ยท Reflection and Learning

Proud and Sorry

Proud and Sorry is a team reflection exercise for reflection and learning: it helps participants reflect on experience and turn observations into learning.

5 to 15 minutesTIME
Small group (4-8)GROUP SIZE
QuietENERGY
In person, RemoteSETTING
Medium cognitive loadCOGNITIVE LOAD
Strengthens Learning Transfer This reflection and learning exercise strengthens Learning Transfer, one of the eight Gathering Effectiveness pillars.

How to run it

  1. In People Science teams, have each person share what they are proud of and what they are disappointed about in a given shared project
  2. Have the teams think about what led to the successes and what led to the disappointments and how they can change that with their next project moving forward
  3. Proud and Sorry Timing 5 15 minutes Purpose/Objectives Quick Description Discuss successes and failures in a project in a non-defensive manner.
  4. Use this activity to wrap up a project or to kickstart a new one.
  5. Best for teams that have worked together before Process In People Science teams, have each person share what they are proud of and what they are disappointed about in a given shared project.
  6. Logistics People Science teams prepared in advance Cool Possibilities/Options Have the team members first write down their thoughts on what they are proud of or sorry about allows the team a certain amount of individuality versus a potential group think on the success and disappointment of one project.
  7. 15 minutes, discussion, interactive break, reflection, small groups 321
  8. Discuss successes and failures in a project in a non-defensive manner.
  9. Best for teams that have worked together before
Live facilitator

Run this exercise live

The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.

Prompts to use +

In People Science teams, have each person share what they are proud of and what they are disappointed about in a given shared project

Have the teams think about what led to the successes and what led to the disappointments and how they can change that with their next project moving forward

Proud and Sorry Timing 5 15 minutes Purpose/Objectives Quick Description Discuss successes and failures in a project in a non-defensive manner.

Use this activity to wrap up a project or to kickstart a new one.

Best for teams that have worked together before Process In People Science teams, have each person share what they are proud of and what they are disappointed about in a given shared project.

Logistics People Science teams prepared in advance Cool Possibilities/Options Have the team members first write down their thoughts on what they are proud of or sorry about allows the team a certain amount of individuality versus a potential group think on the success and disappointment of one project.

Run this with your AI assistant +

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Adapt this exercise for my exact room. Exercise: Proud and Sorry. Readiness: Publishable Draft. Core moves: In People Science teams, have each person share what they are proud of and what they are disappointed about in a given shared project; Have the teams think about what led to the successes and what led to the disappointments and how they can change that with their next project moving forward; Proud and Sorry Timing 5 15 minutes Purpose/Objectives Quick Description Discuss successes and failures in a project in a non-defensive manner.; Use this activity to wrap up a project or to kickstart a new one.. Return a concise facilitator script with timing, wording, safety notes, and remote/in-person adjustments.

Origin unverified

  • Where we observed it: The strongest current observations come from Relationship Makers Handbook; aggregators are listed as additional observations, not origin proof. (1 source observed, including Relationship Makers Handbook.)
  • What that means: we track where an exercise has been observed in public sources. We do not claim to know who created it, or how popular it is.
  • No efficacy claims: appearing in this library is not a claim that the exercise is proven effective. Facilitator judgment and context decide whether it works for a given room.
  • Corrections: if you have evidence of an earlier or more accurate source, read our methodology and trust boundary and tell us.

Pairs well with