Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: a76d6cb1495063ff7e0b0bc6610cf2b547a1a6d08933c00ffab00373e1e65332

# What is Collaborative Learning

Participants reflect on past positive and negative collaborations, build shared trait lists, and prioritize top factors for effective group work.

**Time:** 60 minutes. 60 minutes matches the complete multi-step sequence recorded in the source instructions (5 + 10 + 10 + 20 + 15).
**People:** 4 to 24. Solo reflection, whole-group listing, then breakout groups of 2 to 4 for ranking. At 5 participants, form one group of 2 and one group of 3.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Identify observable behaviors and group conditions that help or hinder collaboration.
**Use it when:** Use when launching a new team or project group that needs shared working agreements based on past experience.
**Skip it when:** Skip when a group already has established ground rules and needs immediate work on a technical task.

## Materials and tools

- 1 pad of flip chart paper
- 4 markers in different colors
- 1 pen per participant
- Scratch paper for each participant
- Wall tape for posting flip chart sheets

## Before participants arrive

1. Use wall tape to hang one sheet titled Positive Collaboration and one sheet titled Negative Collaboration on the wall.
2. Set up a timer visible to the facilitator.
3. Distribute blank scratch paper and pens to each seat.

## Say this to open

We are going to examine what makes working together succeed or stall. Think back to a specific collaborative experience you had in the past that went well. Write down two or three concrete traits that made it work.

## How to run it

### 1. Reflect on positive collaboration (5 minutes)

Read the opening script aloud. Give participants 5 minutes of quiet time to recall a real collaboration and write 2 to 3 descriptive traits on scratch paper.

### 2. Catalog positive traits (10 minutes)

Invite volunteers to call out positive traits one at a time. Record them on the Positive Collaboration flip chart, clustering similar items into themes. To stay within time, collect 8 to 12 distinct contributions rather than calling on every person individually. Do not debate or evaluate traits in this step.

### 3. Reflect and catalog negative traits (10 minutes)

Ask participants to recall a negative collaborative experience. Give 2 minutes of silent reflection to note traits to avoid on scratch paper. Then invite volunteers to call out 8 to 12 distinct negative traits. Record them on the Negative Collaboration chart without critique.

### 4. Rank top attributes in small groups (20 minutes)

Divide the room into small groups of 2 to 4. For 5 people, form a pair and a trio. Direct each group to review both wall charts and select their top 5 positive attributes and top 5 negative attributes to avoid. For example, a group might prioritize responsiveness to team members over familiarity. Have each group write their ranked lists on scratch paper and tape them beside the main charts when finished.

### 5. Debrief as a full group (15 minutes)

Gather the full room around the posted lists. Have a spokesperson from each small group read their number one positive trait and number one pitfall. Use the remaining time to ask 2 debrief questions from the list.


## Debrief questions

- Which negative attributes are most likely to derail our work here?
- Which positive attributes are most critical to maintain in our next session?
- Who holds responsibility for keeping these conditions in place?

**Finished output:** Two thematic wall charts of positive and negative traits, plus posted small-group top-five ranking sheets to reference for future group norms.

## Remote

Use a shared digital whiteboard with two distinct columns for positive and negative traits. Have participants type notes individually during silent prompts, copy a representative sample to the main board, and then move into breakout rooms of 2 to 4 with edit rights to post their top five lists.

## Hybrid

Pair in-room participants with each other and remote participants into online breakout rooms. Record all contributions directly onto a single shared cloud whiteboard projected in the room, with a designated in-person speaker relaying remote audio during full-group sharing.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may submit traits via chat, written notes, or spoken word.
- Anyone may opt to pass on sharing personal work stories and instead contribute general observations.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants start debating whether a trait is good or bad during cataloging steps.**

Remind the room that cataloging is only for collection. Note the exact words on the chart and park debate for small-group ranking.

**A small group gets stuck trying to reach unanimous consensus on their top five.**

Instruct the group to use dot voting or a quick majority show of hands so they complete their selection within time.


## Terms used here

- Attribute: A specific behavior, habit, or condition that shapes how a group operates.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Collaborative Discussion Project (item 1.1, 'What is Collaborative Learning?'), submitted by Nicholas Longo.

Retained the five-step flow, timing, and prompts from Nicholas Longo's submission to the Collaborative Discussion Project. Set collection caps of 8 to 12 traits in steps 2 and 3 so whole-group listing runs smoothly at group max without rushing. Specified that small-group ranking sheets are taped beside the main charts to serve as tangible reference outputs. Added UWT hybrid instructions and practical access options.

[Collaborative Discussion Project](https://www.collaborativediscussionproject.com/items-1/11whatiscollaborativelearning)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/1-what-is-collaborative-learning/