Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 3ca38ab6a5b2901a575a138681d2bab93986ab7dc5409d28a70bd3b260a2fb46

# The Role of Values in Collaborative Discussion

Participants draft individual value statements, share them in pairs without judgment, and analyze which values drive different viewpoints on a scenario. They produce personal value statements and a group list of values identified in the scenario.

**Time:** 60 minutes. Source specifies 60 minutes across four steps: 10 min, 10 min, 30 min, and 10 min.
**People:** 4 to 24. Independent writing, pairs, small groups of 3 to 6 (split odd sizes into triads or quartets), and whole-group debrief

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Identify how underlying values inform statements, disagreements, and choices during group discussions.
**Use it when:** Use when a team or class needs to examine contentious topics constructively, or when preparing a group for policy or collaborative decision-making.
**Skip it when:** Skip during urgent tactical standups, crisis triage, or when participants lack safety to express personal viewpoints.

## Materials and tools

- One printed worksheet or blank paper per person
- One pen or pencil per person
- One copy of the discussion scenario per small group (or displayed on a slide/shared document)
- Digital collaborative document or whiteboard with a two-column table for remote groups
- Timer for the facilitator

## Before participants arrive

1. Arrange seating into small groups of 3 to 6 people.
2. Print worksheets or prepare the digital document with the writing prompts and the selected library scenario.

## Say this to open

Today we will look at how personal values shape how we speak and listen. First, write down three values and what they mean to you. Next, share those in pairs without debate or judgment. Then we will discuss a scenario together to practice naming the values beneath different viewpoints.

## How to run it

### 1. Draft individual value statements (10 minutes)

Say the opening script. Direct participants to work independently on paper or in personal notes. Ask everyone to write down three core values and turn each into a sentence using the format: 'I value [concept] because I believe [statement].' For example: 'I value personal responsibility because I believe I alone answer for my actions.' Anyone who prefers not to disclose personal history may choose professional or civic values. Give quiet writing time until the 10-minute mark.

### 2. Share in pairs without judgment (10 minutes)

Ask participants to pair up within their small groups (form one triad if numbers are odd). Partner A shares one or two value statements. Partner B asks clarifying questions only, such as 'Where does this value come from?' or 'Can you share a time you acted on it?' Partner B must not argue, evaluate, or give opinions. In triads, rotate every three minutes. In pairs, signal partners to swap roles at the 5-minute mark.

### 3. Discuss scenario and uncover underlying values (30 minutes)

Direct groups of 3 to 6 to the library budget scenario on their worksheet. For the first 10 minutes, the group discusses the scenario candidly, with each member taking a turn to respond. At the 10-minute mark, call time and instruct groups to halt the debate. For the remaining 20 minutes, groups stop trying to convince each other and list the core values driving each position, plus values that an unrepresented stakeholder might hold. Groups record these values on their worksheet or shared document.

### 4. Debrief as a full group (10 minutes)

Reconvene the full room. Call on 3 to 4 volunteers across different groups to answer one of the debrief questions. Focus strictly on how identifying underlying values changes the tone and outcome of disagreement.


## Debrief questions

- How did shifting your focus from convincing others to naming values change the discussion?
- Which values appeared most frequently across your small group discussions, and which were less common?
- How might naming underlying values help resolve deadlocks when a group must make a joint decision?

**Finished output:** Written individual value statements and a completed small-group table of values mapped to competing scenario positions.

## Remote

Use breakout rooms for small groups and pair shares. Share the worksheet text and scenario in a shared document. In Step 3, small groups record identified values in a two-column table labeled 'Perspective' and 'Underlying Value.' Bring all participants back to the main room for the final 10-minute debrief.

## Hybrid

Equip in-person rooms with dedicated microphones and screens. Pair remote participants with remote partners and in-person with in-person to avoid audio feedback. Have all groups post their Step 3 value lists into a single shared online document so the whole room can view them during the debrief.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may select professional, civic, or abstract values rather than personal life values.
- Participants may pass during pair sharing or opt to listen without reading their written sentences aloud.
- Provide printed or digital copies of the scenario in advance for visual access.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants start debating or critiquing each other during the pair share in Step 2.**

Remind the room promptly that the partner role is strictly to ask clarifying questions about origins and examples, not to agree, disagree, or challenge.

**Small groups continue arguing about the scenario in Step 3 instead of analyzing underlying values.**

Call an audible pause at the 10-minute mark. Direct groups to put down solution arguments and record single value words tied to each perspective on their worksheet.


## Terms used here

- Value Statement: A sentence stating a guiding priority and the reason behind it, formatted as 'I value X because I believe Y.'

## Participant material: Values in Discussion Worksheet and Scenario

PART 1: INDIVIDUAL VALUE STATEMENTS
Select three core values (for example: accountability, sustainability, justice, transparency, autonomy, stability).
1. I value ____________ because I believe ____________________________________.
2. I value ____________ because I believe ____________________________________.
3. I value ____________ because I believe ____________________________________.

PART 2: PAIR INQUIRY QUESTIONS
When listening to your partner, ask only clarifying questions:
- Where does this value come from for you?
- Can you share an example of a situation where you acted on this value?
- How does this value guide your choices?
(Do not critique, challenge, or debate your partner's values.)

PART 3: PRACTICE SCENARIO
Scenario: A regional public library has received a budget surplus. One faction wants to invest the money entirely into expanding digital subscriptions and e-reader lending to serve remote and homebound patrons. Another faction wants to use the funds exclusively to extend physical evening hours and hire security personnel to keep the physical building open longer as a safe community refuge.

Values Analysis:
- What core values motivate the digital expansion position?
- What core values motivate the physical hours and security position?
- What values might an unrepresented group (such as local authors or families with toddlers) bring to this decision?

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Collaborative Discussion Project under the title '1.5 The Role of Values in Collaborative Discussion.'

Retained the four-step sequence, 60-minute duration, pair inquiry mechanic, and scenario-analysis structure from the Collaborative Discussion Project source. UWT adjusted group formatting to 3 to 6 to handle odd numbers, aligned the step instructions with the library scenario worksheet, added concrete digital document specifications for remote delivery, and provided neutral examples and access options.

[Collaborative Discussion Project](https://www.collaborativediscussionproject.com/items-1/15theroleofvaluesincollaborativediscussion)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/5-the-role-of-values-in-collaborative-discussion/