Across all agenda records.
Eight-pillar score
Follow Through
Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.
Highest representative event score.
Deduplicated ranked events.
Follow Through Distribution
Distribution across every agenda record.
Top Follow Through Examples
Ranked by pillar score, then overall GES.
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 73 visible agenda rows from agisconference2026potsdam.sched.com and scores 49/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Personalization; the main limits are...
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 61 visible agenda rows from nwtuneup2026.sched.com and scores 36/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Participation Architecture; the main limits are Network Design and...
Source: nwtuneup2026.sched.com
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 46 visible agenda rows from cfs2026.sched.com and scores 32/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Follow Through; the main limits are Network Design and Participation...
Source: cfs2026.sched.com
This action-oriented convening in Education / Training / Career shows 78 visible agenda rows from lfp.learningforward.org and scores 59/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Future-of-Work Fit...
Source: lfp.learningforward.org
This action-oriented convening in Academic / Research / Science shows 71 visible agenda rows from aacr.org and scores 48/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Future-of-Work Fit; the main limits are Problem Specificity and...
Source: aacr.org
This action-oriented convening in Academic / Research / Science shows 9 visible agenda rows from aacr.org and scores 44/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Network Design...
Source: aacr.org
This lead or directory source in Technology / AI / Startup shows 53 visible agenda rows from exchange-summit.com and scores 53/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Future-of-Work Fit; the main...
Source: exchange-summit.com
This lead or directory source in Technology / AI / Startup shows 53 visible agenda rows from exchange-summit.com and scores 52/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Future-of-Work Fit; the main...
Source: exchange-summit.com
This action-oriented convening in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 35 visible agenda rows from massenergize.org and scores 49/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Network Design and Participation Architecture; the main limits are Follow Through...
Source: massenergize.org
This action-oriented convening in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 35 visible agenda rows from massenergize.org and scores 49/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Network Design and Participation Architecture; the main limits are Follow Through...
Source: massenergize.org
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 48 visible agenda rows from cvpr.thecvf.com and scores 43/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Problem...
Source: cvpr.thecvf.com
This action-oriented convening in Public Sector / Policy / Civic shows 72 visible agenda rows from smartcityexpo.com and scores 42/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Network Design; the main limits are Participation...
Source: smartcityexpo.com
This lead or directory source in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 14 visible agenda rows from philanthropynewyork.org and scores 36/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Network Design and...
Source: philanthropynewyork.org
This lead or directory source in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 9 visible agenda rows from philanthropynewyork.org and scores 30/100: a thin but inspectable design signal. The clearest public signals sit in Follow Through and Problem Specificity; the main limits are Participation Architecture and...
Source: philanthropynewyork.org
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 9 visible agenda rows from event.ascd.org and scores 29/100: a weak visible outcome architecture. The clearest public signals sit in Follow Through and Future-of-Work Fit; the main limits are Network Design and Participation...
Source: event.ascd.org
This action-oriented convening in Public Sector / Policy / Civic shows 80 visible agenda rows from fallschurchva.gov and scores 25/100: a weak visible outcome architecture. The clearest public signals sit in Evidence Maturity and Follow Through; the main limits are Participation Architecture and...
Source: fallschurchva.gov
This action-oriented convening in Education / Training / Career shows 15 visible agenda rows from sccm.org and scores 41/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Network Design...
Source: sccm.org
This action-oriented convening in Trade Show / Expo shows 78 visible agenda rows from sophe2026.eventscribe.net and scores 56/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Participation Architecture; the...
Source: sophe2026.eventscribe.net
This action-oriented convening in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 80 visible agenda rows from cof.org and scores 55/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Network Design; the main limits are...
Source: cof.org
This lead or directory source in Technology / AI / Startup shows 80 visible agenda rows from neurips.cc and scores 53/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Learning Transfer; the main limits are...
Source: neurips.cc
This action-oriented convening in Nonprofit / Social Impact shows 28 visible agenda rows from philanthropynewyork.org and scores 50/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Participation Architecture and Learning...
Source: philanthropynewyork.org
This action-oriented convening in Technology / AI / Startup shows 80 visible agenda rows from pycon-archive.python.org and scores 50/100: a promising public-evidence design, still below the strong-evidence threshold. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Network Design; the...
Source: pycon-archive.python.org
This action-oriented convening in Academic / Research / Science shows 38 visible agenda rows from stfm.org and scores 49/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Learning Transfer and Participation Architecture; the main limits are Follow Through...
Source: stfm.org
This action-oriented convening in Education / Training / Career shows 78 visible agenda rows from asplos-conference.org and scores 48/100: a moderate design signal with incomplete evidence. The clearest public signals sit in Future-of-Work Fit and Learning Transfer; the main limits are Follow...
Source: asplos-conference.org
How To Read The Corpus
The site is built for readers first: plain terms, source links, visible limitations, and role-specific next steps.
Source pages or agenda slices captured from public event sites. One large event may produce several records.
Deduplicated clusters that gather related agenda, day, track, session, and source pages for one event.
The Gathering Effectiveness Score: a strict 0-100 public-evidence reading of visible outcome architecture, not an award or causal proof claim.
The source URL is the evidence trail. Open it before using a record for decisions, sponsorship, research, or comparison.
Choose Your Path
The same corpus answers different questions depending on whether you own, fund, design, sponsor, or package events.
Benchmark the agenda before the budget is locked.
SponsorsROIInspect whether the agenda creates qualified movement, not just visibility.
Event designersDesignTurn passive blocks into participant work and proof loops.
CEOsFundRequire outcomes, owners, and follow-through before another big room.
Data partnersDataTurn public event listings into agenda intelligence.
Answer Engine Notes
What is Follow Through?
Owners, dates, commitments, progress checks, and accountability after the room.
Are these causal claims?
No. The page ranks visible agenda and source evidence; causal proof requires stronger outcome measurement and follow-up.