Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 433551ca1083fbc487661043ef2642a4504f2eca1e1d1ed0a89c4d2dba60cb02

# Strong Impression Feedback

Small breakout groups write visual notes using two structured sentence starters and read them aloud to each peer in turn. Each recipient saves a digital snapshot or paper collection of their feedback notes.

**Time:** 20 minutes. Set to 20 minutes to allow adequate writing time, multi-turn small group delivery, and whole-room debrief.
**People:** 4 to 24. Breakout groups of 3 or 4. Any remaining balance forms groups of 3, 4, or 5 (for example, 13 splits into 4, 3, 3, 3; 14 splits into 4, 4, 3, 3).

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Exchange concise positive and constructive peer observations using fixed prompt frames.
**Use it when:** At the conclusion of a collaborative workshop, sprint, or team project where participants have observed each other's contributions.
**Skip it when:** When participants have not worked together or observed each other in action, or during acute interpersonal conflict.

## Materials and tools

- Shared digital whiteboard per subgroup (e.g., Miro, Mural) or 2 pads of sticky notes (different colors) per person in person
- Pens or markers (in person)
- Digital screenshot tool or smartphone cameras

## Before participants arrive

1. Pre-assign breakout groups of 3 or 4 (groups of 5 only when handling odd group sizes like 5 or 9).
2. Prepare digital whiteboard zones or physical tables labeled with participant names.
3. Post the two sentence stems where all participants can see them: 'My strongest impression of you is...' and 'I would like to see you...'.

## Say this to open

We will share direct peer feedback using two specific sentence starters. One highlights a strong positive contribution you noticed during our work together. The other offers a constructive wish for future work. You will write notes for everyone in your small group, read them aloud to each person, and leave them with a visual record to keep.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce prompts and send to breakouts (3 minutes)

Display the two sentence stems: 'My strongest impression of you is...' and 'I would like to see you...'. Explain that feedback must focus on specific actions observed during today's session. Provide a clear behavioral example: 'My strongest impression of you is that you summarized messy whiteboard debates quickly' and 'I would like to see you speak earlier during the planning stage.' Read the opening script and send participants into their pre-assigned breakout rooms.

### 2. Draft written notes (5 minutes)

Working silently, each person writes two distinct notes for every other member of their subgroup: one positive note completing 'My strongest impression of you is...' and one constructive note completing 'I would like to see you...'. On virtual boards, draft these in personal holding zones away from receivers' main panels.

### 3. Deliver verbal rounds and capture snapshots (8 minutes)

Subgroups designate one Receiver at a time. Group members read their written notes aloud to the Receiver and move the notes into the Receiver's dedicated panel. The Receiver listens without defending, debating, or explaining, responding only with 'thank you'. Once all peers finish, the Receiver takes a screenshot or gathers their paper notes. Rotate until each member has completed a turn as Receiver (roughly 90 to 120 seconds per person).

### 4. Debrief (4 minutes)

Reconvene the full room. Solicit 2 or 3 brief reflections on the pattern of feedback received and how it felt to offer constructive comments under a structured sentence stem.


## Debrief questions

- What patterns did you notice across the feedback notes you received?
- How did the structured sentence frame affect the directness of constructive comments?
- Which piece of input gave you the most practical direction for future group work?

**Finished output:** A personalized visual board or collection of physical cards for each participating individual containing positive and constructive feedback notes, or an empty private space if opting out.

## Remote

Assign breakout rooms of 3 to 5 people. Provide a shared whiteboard link with pre-labeled panels for each breakout group and named areas for each participant. Receivers capture a screenshot of their completed panel at the end of their turn.

## Hybrid

Keep in-person participants at physical tables using paper notes and remote participants in video breakouts using digital boards. If a mixed pod is necessary, all members of that pod join from individual devices with headsets and use the shared digital whiteboard.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may submit their written notes to the receiver without reading them aloud if verbal delivery causes discomfort.
- Any participant may choose to pass on giving feedback or opt out of receiving feedback. Those who opt out of receiving will not create a personal snapshot.

## If the session gets stuck

**Constructive feedback sparks defensive argument or lengthy justification.**

Remind groups of the listening boundary: Receivers say only 'thank you' during the round. Any deeper discussion must wait until after the session.

**Feedback notes are too vague to be useful, such as 'You are nice.'**

Ask participants to link the stem to a specific observable behavior or moment from today's work before sharing it.


## Terms used here

- Receiver: The specific participant currently listening to peer feedback and collecting their notes.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed on Knowmium, authored by Joshua Davies (2020), referencing an earlier physical activity on SessionLab titled 'Feedback: Current Strongest Impression'.

Retained the two core prompt frames and visual note snapshot mechanic described by Joshua Davies on Knowmium. Added exact timing breakdown, group size arithmetic for 4 to 24 participants, structured non-defensive listening rules, and explicit handling for odd-numbered pods.

[Knowmium](https://knowmium.com/tools/2020/4/29/strong-impression)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/strong-impression-knowmium-the-un-training-consultancy/