Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: b148d1bdedb7ba9f750c850a9f2285c5dd0f49dfe19498818469854d7bf3c731

# Poker Face Card Hierarchy

Participants place an unseen playing card on their foreheads and silently interact, treating each other according to card rank. Afterward, people sort themselves into perceived status tiers before checking their actual values.

**Time:** 15 minutes. Based on the 10 to 15 minute duration in Playmeo evidence.
**People:** 6 to 24. Whole-room mingling followed by three sorting clusters.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Demonstrate how nonverbal cues and visible markers shape interpersonal status and group sorting.
**Use it when:** Use during communication or social perception workshops to examine how nonverbal feedback influences where people think they belong in a group.
**Skip it when:** Skip when the group has unaddressed interpersonal conflict, heightened sensitivity around hierarchy, or when members cannot move freely in an open space.

## Materials and tools

- One standard 52-card deck of playing cards (or one card per participant)
- Optional elastic headbands or painter's tape to hold cards without using hands
- Three signs posted in room corners: Low Value (2-5), Medium Value (6-10), High Value (Jack-Ace)

## Before participants arrive

1. Count out one card per participant with an even spread of low cards (2 to 5), medium cards (6 to 10), and high cards (Jack, Queen, King, Ace).
2. Cover or position participants away from reflective surfaces such as mirrors or dark exterior windows.
3. Post the three tier signs on three separate walls or corners.

## Say this to open

In this exercise, you will receive one card face down. Do not look at its face. When I tell you, hold it against your forehead facing outward so others can see it. We will mingle silently for two minutes. Treat everyone you meet based entirely on the rank of the card on their forehead. You may use facial expressions, bowing, ignoring, greeting, or body language, but no words or number signaling. Pay attention to how people treat you.

## How to run it

### 1. Distribute cards and state ground rules (3 minutes)

Deal one card face down to each participant. Remind everyone not to peek. Deliver the opening script. Emphasize that physical contact is not permitted and interactions must stay silent. Instruct participants to raise cards to their foreheads with the face turned outward.

### 2. Mingle silently using status cues (3 minutes)

Invite the room to circulate. Participants make eye contact and react to each other based on card rank (for example, showing deference to an Ace or turning away from a 2). Signal when one minute remains. Stop mingling promptly at three minutes while instructing everyone to keep cards raised without peeking.

### 3. Sort into perceived value tiers (3 minutes)

Point to the three posted signs: Low (2-5), Medium (6-10), and High (Jack-Ace). Ask participants to walk silently to the area where they believe their card belongs, based solely on how others treated them. Once everyone has chosen a corner, allow everyone to take down and inspect their card.

### 4. Debrief nonverbal hierarchy and sorting (6 minutes)

Bring the full group into a seated circle. Facilitate a discussion using the debrief questions. Hear 3 to 4 observations from different tiers regarding cues, accuracy, and reactions to perceived status.


## Debrief questions

- What specific nonverbal cues made you think your card was high, medium, or low?
- How did it feel to be treated according to that card, especially if you were treated as low rank or high rank?
- Where did people sort themselves into the wrong tier, and what caused that mismatch?

**Finished output:** A shared group comparison between assumed status based on peer treatment and actual assigned rank.

## Remote

This in-person card game depends on live spatial mingling, restricted self-sight, and subtle nonverbal bodily cues that do not translate into video galleries. For remote groups, run a distinct alternative: assign hidden status roles privately by direct chat to pairs in breakout rooms, ask them to hold a 2-minute project negotiation, and have each guess their partner assigned status tier before revealing.

## Hybrid

Hybrid delivery is not recommended because remote participants cannot share the physical line-of-sight and room mingling mechanics. Run the in-person activity exclusively with room members while remote colleagues conduct the remote alternative in a parallel breakout room.

## Access and participation choices

- Provide elastic headband strips or painter's tape loops so participants do not need to hold an arm raised overhead for several minutes.
- Any participant may opt out of mingling and serve as a silent observer recording visible behaviors for the debrief.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants use fingers to signal numbers directly to each other.**

Intervene immediately and remind the group that literal number communication is prohibited; only relational attitudes and status gestures are allowed.

**Participants see their card reflection in windows or screens.**

Close blinds before starting and remind participants to face away from shiny fixtures or switched-off monitors.


## Terms used here

- Face value: The rank or number shown on the front of a standard playing card, where 2 is lowest and Ace is highest.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in the Playmeo activity database under the title Poker Face, authored by Mark Collard.

Retained the core mechanic from Playmeo evidence: cards held on foreheads without peeking, silent status-based interaction, and sorting into low, medium, and high value tiers before looking. UWT added explicit tier boundary definitions (2-5, 6-10, Jack-Ace), setup precautions regarding reflective surfaces noted in public comments, hands-free headband access adaptations, and timeboxed step increments.

[Playmeo](https://www.playmeo.com/activities/team-building-problem-solving-activities/poker-face)

[Playmeo](https://www.playmeo.com/activities/team-building-problem-solving-activities/poker-face/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/social-awareness-exercise-explores-bias-inclusion-poker-face/