Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: be71db4bcd50e39aea437b7794cf41bce7cd5a9ed09fbe7b7f7f09e7b3e455a9

# Rebuilding Trust Through Small Commitments

Teams define observable daily trust behaviors, draft three to five micro-commitments to test for 30 days, test them against realistic pressure scenarios, and set a low-friction review rhythm.

**Time:** 90 minutes. Source session length is 90 minutes.
**People:** 4 to 16. Individual writing, whole-group clustering and dot voting, pairs or triads for scenario testing, whole-group consensus.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Convert abstract complaints about trust into observable, testable daily behaviors and a lightweight accountability schedule.
**Use it when:** A intact team that has experienced follow-through failures or strained credibility and wants concrete behavioral rules rather than emotional processing.
**Skip it when:** Active grievances, harassment claims, or severe organizational conflict requiring formal mediation, HR intervention, or leadership restructuring.

## Materials and tools

- 3 flip chart pads or large whiteboards
- Sticky notes in 3 colors (at least 8 notes per person)
- Fine-tip dry-erase markers or felt pens (1 per person)
- Dot stickers for voting (3 per person)
- Wall tape if hanging paper sheets
- Timer or mobile clock

## Before participants arrive

1. Hang three blank flip chart sheets labeled: '1. Trust Behaviors', '2. 30-Day Micro-Commitments', and '3. Follow-Through Rhythm'.
2. Prepare a fourth sheet or board section with the three Micro-Commitment Design Template prompts: Action, Timing, Verification.
3. Distribute sticky notes, pens, and 3 dot stickers to each seat.

## Say this to open

Today focuses on actions we can control. Trust is not a vague feeling we can force. It grows when we do what we say we will do, consistently, over time. We will define what reliable behavior looks like in our daily routine, agree on three to five small commitments to practice for 30 days, test them against real workplace friction, and set an easy rhythm to review progress.

## How to run it

### 1. Frame the work (10 minutes)

Deliver the opening script. State the session ground rule: focus strictly on controllable behaviors rather than motives or past apologies. Walk through the four workshop milestones: defining behaviors, drafting micro-commitments, stress-testing scenarios, and agreeing on review cadence. Check for procedural questions.

### 2. Define trust behaviors (25 minutes)

Ask participants to write sticky notes completing: 'I trust this team when...'. Require one observable behavior per note (e.g., 'when meeting notes list named task owners'). Give 7 minutes for silent writing. Have everyone post notes on the chart. Spend 3 minutes reading silently. Cluster notes into 3 to 5 named themes. Give 5 minutes for silent dot voting with each person placing their 3 dots. Record the top 3 to 5 ranked themes on a fresh chart.

### 3. Design micro-commitments (25 minutes)

Present the template: What is the action? When do we do it? How do we verify it? Draft the first commitment together to show the standard. Split into pairs or triads to draft commitments for the remaining themes (10 minutes). Reconvene the room. Check each proposal: Is it concrete? Can we maintain it for 30 days? Is it visible without policing? Refine wording into 3 to 5 final commitments. Record them on the Micro-Commitments chart.

### 4. Test scenarios in pairs (15 minutes)

Assign each pair or triad one agreed commitment with a friction scenario (e.g., a meeting runs late and members want to leave early). Groups take 8 minutes to discuss: What does keeping the commitment look like? What obstacle appears? How do we prompt each other without blame? Reconvene. Call for 1-minute readouts from 3 groups. Non-speaking members may designate a partner or post written notes to the board. Note practical reminders on the chart.

### 5. Set follow-through rhythm (10 minutes)

Propose two low-overhead review options: a 2-minute agenda item at the start of existing weekly team meetings, or a quick Friday check-in prompt in team chat. Ask the team to select one or adjust it to fit existing routines. Assign a volunteer to ask the question during the first two weeks: 'Which commitments did we keep this week, and where did we slip?' List 3 observable signs of progress that the group will look for after 30 days.

### 6. Confirm commitments and close (5 minutes)

Read the final micro-commitments aloud. Conduct a rapid roll call: in-person attendees affirm verbally or nod; remote attendees type their name and affirmation in chat. Confirm all responses are gathered. Confirm the date, time, and owner for the 30-day review checkpoint. Remind the room that keeping most commitments consistently beats sporadic perfection.


## Debrief questions

- Which of these micro-commitments will require the biggest shift in our daily work?
- How will we gently remind each other in real time when a commitment slips?
- What observable change will tell us after 30 days that reliability has improved?

**Finished output:** A posted chart of 3 to 5 specific, observable 30-day micro-commitments and an agreed weekly follow-through check-in routine with a designated initial owner.

## Remote

Use a digital whiteboard with pre-configured frames matching the flip charts. Step 2 uses silent digital sticky-note entry and virtual dot stamps. Step 4 runs in breakout rooms of 2 to 3 people for 8 minutes. Step 6 uses a text roll call in the meeting chat where participants type their name and consent.

## Hybrid

Seat in-person participants with a direct line of sight to the shared camera and audio. Remote and in-person members join a shared digital board where all sticky notes and commitments are mirrored. For Step 4, assign breakout pairs within each modality: remote pairs use digital breakout rooms and in-person pairs talk in the room. When assigning scenarios, post the prompts on the shared board. Alternate readouts between one remote pair and one in-person pair.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may submit sticky notes anonymously during the clustering step.
- Participants who prefer not to speak during scenario readouts may contribute through writing or partner representation.
- Consent during step 6 can be signaled verbally, by nod, or by written chat affirmation without requiring personal emotional testimony.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants write vague sentiments like 'be more respectful' or 'communicate better' during Step 2.**

Ask the author or the room: 'What would an outsider see or hear people doing if that was happening?' Translate the note into a concrete physical action before clustering.

**The team proposes overly ambitious, complex workflow overhauls during Step 3.**

Intervene with the constraint: 'What is the smallest version of this action that still builds trust if done every single time?' Trim the scope until the action takes under two minutes or fits inside existing meetings.


## Terms used here

- Micro-Commitment: A small, observable, low-friction behavioral rule that team members can practice and verify daily without administrative overhead.

## Participant material: Micro-Commitment Design Template

Trust Behavior Theme:

1. Concrete Action: What specific observable behavior will we practice?

2. Trigger & Timing: When and where does this action occur? (e.g., in every sprint review, daily at standup, before logging off on Friday)

3. Verification: How will anyone on the team know without guessing whether this action took place?

4. Obstacle Check: What common pressure will tempt us to skip it, and how will we respond?

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in WorkshopBank as 'Rebuilding Trust Through Small Commitments'. WorkshopBank attributes the framing to behavioral trust practices; original authorship is unstated in supplied records.

Retained the core sequence, prompts, and timing from the WorkshopBank exercise: framing trust as behavior, 'I trust this team when...' sticky generation, dot voting, template-driven micro-commitments, scenario stress-testing, lightweight rhythm design, and public affirmation. Added structured instructions for group clustering arithmetic, concrete hybrid mechanics, explicit step boundaries totaling 90 minutes, concise step instructions under 90 words, and the complete text of the Micro-Commitment Design Template.

[WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/tools/rebuilding-trust-through-small-commitments)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/rebuilding-trust-through-small-commitments-workshopbank/