Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 088a14e43e33e87e23cdfa1d015be1d8c87195d7a0d2a56db8d762c9af73192a

# Choose Your Words Wisely

Participants map a specific communication setting onto a semantic canvas to examine power dynamics, rules, and vocabulary between two actors. Small teams analyze where terminology creates friction or alignment before agreeing on practical communication shifts.

**Time:** 40 minutes. Source suggests 20 to 40 minutes; 40 minutes allows full coverage of all canvas sections and final cross-group analysis.
**People:** 4 to 24. Independent small groups of 3 to 6 people working on separate canvases or distinct interactions

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Identify how language choices, unspoken rules, and power dynamics hinder or support collaboration between two roles in a defined setting.
**Use it when:** Use when two departments or roles talk past each other, during cross-functional service design, or when defining technical and product terminology across teams.
**Skip it when:** Skip when a team needs quick tactical task triage or when interpersonal conflict requires mediated conflict resolution rather than linguistic analysis.

## Materials and tools

- One large Semantic Environment Canvas (A0 or A1 poster size, or drawn on flip chart paper) per table
- 3 pads of sticky notes in different colors per table
- Fine-tip markers (one per participant)
- Masking tape for wall mounting

## Before participants arrive

1. Draw or print the six-part Semantic Environment Canvas (Environment Name, Actors and Power, Goals, Rules, Key Words, Touchpoints) for each group of 3 to 6.
2. Mount canvases on walls or lay flat on working tables.
3. Distribute sticky notes and markers to each seat.

## Say this to open

We swim in language every day without noticing how it shapes what we can do. Today we will map the semantic environment of one specific interaction between two roles. We will fill out each section together, step by step, using silent writing first and brief discussions second. Your goal is to pinpoint where words, rules, and power help or hurt collaboration.

## How to run it

### 1. Set environment and actors (7 minutes)

Deliver the opening script. Direct groups to pick an interaction context, such as a patient intake or an engineering design handoff. Have individuals spend two minutes writing candidate setting names, then agree on one clear title written at the top. Next, each group selects exactly two distinct roles (Actor A and Actor B) and writes a note describing the power relationship between them, posting it in the Actors section.

### 2. Map goals and rules (8 minutes)

Direct participants to write silently on sticky notes: what are Actor A's goals and Actor B's goals? After 2 minutes, post them on the canvas. Next, prompt silent writing on spoken and unspoken rules: what behaviors are expected or forbidden for each actor? Have participants place rule notes on the canvas and briefly review commonalities.

### 3. Map key words and touchpoints (10 minutes)

Prompt participants to list the technical vocabulary, metaphors, and jargon used by Actor A and Actor B. Ask: do both actors understand these words the same way? Post the notes in the Key Words section. Next, have participants write the channels, physical spaces, and tools where the actors interact, posting them in the Touchpoints section.

### 4. Analyze friction and alignment (10 minutes)

Have groups step back and examine the full canvas. Direct them to draw arrows between contradictory goals, rules, and confusing words. Give each table 5 minutes to identify one major semantic disconnect and one concrete shift in vocabulary or process that would resolve it.

### 5. Whole room debrief (5 minutes)

Convene the whole room. Invite two tables to share one key disconnect they spotted and their proposed shift in wording or rules. Close with a reflection question on everyday terminology.


## Debrief questions

- Where did you find the sharpest mismatch between what Actor A says and what Actor B understands?
- Which unspoken rule created the biggest obstacle to reaching the stated goals?
- What is one phrase our team uses daily that needs clearer shared definition?

**Finished output:** A completed six-section Semantic Environment Canvas showing goals, rules, vocabulary, and power dynamics, with identified disconnects and recommended wording adjustments.

## Remote

Create an online whiteboard with the six-section canvas pre-drawn for each breakout room of 3 to 6 people. Run silent sticky note writing on individual timers, followed by voice discussion. Regroup in the main room for screen sharing and final debrief.

## Hybrid

Assign in-person participants and remote participants to dedicated, separate small groups whenever possible. If mixed, pair each in-person table with a designated laptop and digital canvas so remote members post sticky notes directly onto the shared digital board while audio is captured through a table microphone.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may contribute via written sticky notes, spoken contributions, or by organizing notes on the board.
- Anyone may pass on speaking during the final whole-room debrief without explanation.

## If the session gets stuck

**Groups debate more than two actors and stall during setup.**

Enforce the two-actor limit for the canvas. Explain that additional roles can be captured on a second canvas later, but focusing on two preserves clarity.

**Notes are too vague, such as listing 'communication' as a key word.**

Ask the group for the exact phrase spoken in the room, such as 'sign-off' or 'final deliverable', and replace the generic note.


## Terms used here

- Semantic Environment: The context, rules, vocabulary, and power structures that govern how people communicate in a specific situation.
- Touchpoint: The physical space, tool, or channel where two people or roles exchange information.

## Participant material: Semantic Environment Canvas Layout

Prepare a sheet divided into six functional areas:
1. ENVIRONMENT NAME: What is the specific context or domain of discourse?
2. ACTORS & POWER: Who is Actor A? Who is Actor B? Who holds formal or informal authority?
3. GOALS: Why is Actor A participating? Why is Actor B participating? What does each expect to achieve?
4. RULES: What are the explicit and unspoken behavioral expectations for Actor A and Actor B?
5. KEY WORDS: What technical terms, acronyms, and metaphors does each actor rely upon?
6. TOUCHPOINTS: Where, through what medium, and in what setting do they interact?

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Gamestorming and SessionLab; Gamestorming attributes the Semantic Environment Canvas to Jorge Arango, adapted from Neil Postman's semantic environment framework and canvases by Dave Gray and Alex Osterwalder.

Retained Jorge Arango's Semantic Environment Canvas mechanics, Neil Postman's semantic environment concepts, and the progressive section-by-section mapping flow documented by Gamestorming. Structured into a predictable 40-minute five-step facilitation sequence with explicit silent-writing intervals, a concrete canvas layout template, and defined debrief procedures.

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/choose-your-words-wisely)

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/choose-your-words-wisely/)

[SessionLab](https://www.sessionlab.com/methods/choose-your-words-wisely)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/choose-your-words-wisely/