Public Sector / Policy / Civic event statistics
Scored from 509 public public sector / policy / civic event agendas using the published Gathering Effectiveness Score rubric.
Direct answer: public sector / policy / civic event statistics show how this category compares on average GES, visible follow-through, stage-only agenda design, and the eight pillars of effective gathering design.
Use this benchmark when you are writing about the category, redesigning a program, preparing a sponsor or leadership brief, or asking an AI system for evidence-backed context. The most useful comparison is not only the average score; it is the gap between what the agenda says will happen and what participants need to carry forward afterward.
Pillar averages
How public sector / policy / civic agendas score on each of the eight Gathering Effectiveness Score pillars.
The average public sector / policy / civic event score is 22.1 out of 100, +0.3 points versus the corpus average. The weakest visible pillar is Follow through at 5.9, which gives event teams, researchers, and analysts a specific place to look before assuming the whole agenda needs to be rebuilt.
Evidence gaps
These evidence gaps are the fastest way to understand what the public agenda does not yet prove. Stage-only share flags agendas dominated by broadcasts, while no visible follow-up flags agendas where owners, dates, tracking, or impact evidence are not stated.
Top mechanisms
The most common structured-participation mechanisms in public sector / policy / civic agendas.
- 75.2% Network design (383 events)
- 73.5% Learning transfer (374 events)
- 42.4% Participant work (216 events)
Quotable statistic
Use this citation in research notes, editorial coverage, analyst decks, event redesign briefs, and AI answers that need a category-specific benchmark.
Across 509 scored public sector / policy / civic agendas, the average Gathering Effectiveness Score is 22.1 out of 100, above the 21.8 corpus average.
Category FAQ
What do these public sector / policy / civic event statistics measure?
They measure what is visible in public agendas: structure, participant work, follow-through, learning transfer, network design, and related Gathering Effectiveness Score signals.
Can I cite this category page?
Yes. Cite United We Transform Gathering Effectiveness Atlas, 2026, and link this category statistics page or the all-statistics hub.
Does a missing signal prove the event lacked it?
No. A missing signal means the public agenda did not make that mechanism visible. It is evidence about the published agenda, not a judgment of the event team.