Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: a67131394d053674e8d66414700e3ef9330df69aafe05086def1c2c747668ce2

# Surprising Sentence

Partners take turns adding two or three words at a time to build a single continuous sentence on paper. The exercise highlights active listening, equal contribution, and letting go of predetermined agendas.

**Time:** 15 minutes. Matches the 10 to 15 minute range in the June 2012 Thiagi GameLetter.
**People:** 4 to 24. Pairs (plus one optional trio if total is odd)

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Demonstrate equal-status collaboration by co-creating a single continuous sentence without advance planning.
**Use it when:** Use at the start of a collaboration or communication session to examine what happens when partners must build strictly on each other's words.
**Skip it when:** Skip when participants need to produce factual work or when writing in pairs creates anxiety around basic literacy.

## Materials and tools

- 1 sheet of paper per pair
- 1 pen or pencil per person
- 1 visible countdown timer

## Before participants arrive

1. Place paper and pens at pair stations.
2. Arrange chairs so partners can sit face to face or side by side comfortably.

## Say this to open

We will build the longest single sentence we can make in three minutes. Work in pairs. You may only add two or three words when it is your turn. Do not plan the plot ahead of time. You have to build on whatever your partner just wrote.

## How to run it

### 1. Pair up and set rules (3 minutes)

Form pairs. If an odd person is present, form one trio. Give each pair paper and pens. Partner A writes two or three words, then passes the paper to Partner B, who writes two or three words. Commas are allowed, but no terminal periods until time is called. For example: Partner A writes 'On Tuesday morning', Partner B writes 'an orange cat', Partner A writes 'jumped onto'. Partners must write without verbal coaching.

### 2. Build the sentence (4 minutes)

Start the 3-minute timer. Partners alternate adding two or three words to the shared page. If a participant hesitates, prompt them to write the first two or three words that fit the grammar. Stop immediately when the timer sounds.

### 3. Read aloud in pairs (3 minutes)

Partners read their completed sentence aloud to each other. Have them add a final period or punctuation mark to complete the sentence. Invite them to observe how well it holds together grammatically.

### 4. Debrief core mechanics (5 minutes)

Convene the whole room. Ask two or three volunteer pairs to read a short section. Facilitate a discussion on equal ownership and spontaneous adaptation using the debrief questions. Close on time.


## Debrief questions

- What happened to your original idea when your partner introduced an unexpected word?
- How easy or difficult was it to refrain from steering the sentence toward your own plan?
- In what ways did the equal turn rule affect who owned the final result?

**Finished output:** A completed collaborative sentence written on paper, co-created turn by turn.

## Remote

Pair people in breakout rooms with a shared two-column text document or shared slide. Partner A types two or three words in normal font, then partner B types two or three words in bold. Run the 3-minute timer centrally, recall everyone, and have two pairs paste their sentences into the public chat.

## Hybrid

Pair in-person participants together and remote participants together in breakout rooms. If a cross-pair is necessary, have them use a collaborative text document while connected via video or audio call. Both read their sentences in the common session audio.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants who prefer not to handwrite can type into a shared digital document or speak their words aloud while the partner acts as scribe.
- Anyone may choose to observe a pair and track turn balance instead of writing directly.

## If the session gets stuck

**A participant tries to control the story by writing long multi-clause phrases.**

Intervene gently and restate the constraint: strictly two or three words per turn, no exceptions.

**Partners stall because they are trying to plan an elaborate story arc.**

Remind the group that advance planning slows the flow. Prompt them to accept the immediate grammatical lead and write the next instinctive words.


## Terms used here

- Jolt: A brief interactive activity designed to produce an immediate experiential insight.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Thiagi GameLetter (June 2012), published by The Thiagi Group, where Sivasailam Thiagarajan and Tracy Tagliati describe the activity under the title 'Telephone Game: Surprising Sentence'.

The source document is the June 2012 Thiagi GameLetter containing multiple items (Surprising Sentence by Thiagi and Tracy Tagliati, Lasting Impression Elevator Pitch by Elroye Jones, and a jolt titled When Less Is More). This run sheet extracts 'Surprising Sentence', which matches the core prompts and instructions in the record. UWT adapted the activity from a one-on-one telephone call into a structured paired workshop exercise with exact timings, a neutral start example, pair-reading, and structured group debrief questions.

[The Thiagi Group](https://thiagi.net/archive/www/pfp/IE4H/june2012.html)

[The Thiagi Group](http://thiagi.net/archive/www/pfp/IE4H/june2012.html)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/tgl-june-2012/