Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 1d2e70f71ee763e71d24b3a932188ee1d1c946a250746e51dbc5263a153ed20f

# Sailboat Retrospective

Teams map their project context onto a sailboat illustration using four visual prompts: destination, wind, anchors, and rocks. Participants silently brainstorm notes, group related themes, vote on top priorities, and agree on tangible next steps.

**Time:** 45 minutes. Parabol and Mural sources indicate standard retro workflows (reflect, group, vote, action); 45 minutes allows full coverage for up to 24 people split into table clusters.
**People:** 4 to 24. Individual reflection followed by whole-group or table-level theme clustering and plenary voting

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Identify current progress drivers, systemic delays, upcoming risks, and shared goals to produce concrete team commitments.
**Use it when:** Sprint reviews, project post-mortems, or mid-initiative check-ins when a team needs to look both backward at past friction and forward at future obstacles.
**Skip it when:** Immediate tactical incident triage where root-cause analysis is needed instead of metaphor-based reflection, or when the team lacks an agreed project scope.

## Materials and tools

- 1 large poster or whiteboard per 8 participants with a drawn sailboat, water, island/beacon, anchor, and rocks
- 3 pads of sticky notes per participant
- 1 fine marker per participant
- Dot voting stickers (3 dots per person)
- 1 countdown timer visible to the room

## Before participants arrive

1. Draw the Sailboat canvas on the whiteboard: an Island/Beacon ahead (destination), the Sailboat with Wind behind the sails (accelerators/helpers), an Anchor dragging beneath (delays/frustrations), and Rocks/Reefs in the path (future risks).
2. Place sticky notes and markers at each seat.
3. Ensure every participant can read the four prompt definitions from their seat.

## Say this to open

Welcome. Today we are using the Sailboat Retrospective to examine where we are heading and what is affecting our travel. We have four zones: the Island is our destination or goal, the Wind represents what helps us move faster, the Anchor represents what is currently holding us back, and the Rocks are future hazards we must steer clear of. You will write your observations quietly on sticky notes before we cluster and vote on what to tackle first.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce prompts and warm up (5 minutes)

Explain the four zones using the opening script and point to the drawn canvas. Answer clarifying questions about the definitions. For example, clarify that anchors represent existing friction inside the team, while rocks represent upcoming hazards or external dependencies.

### 2. Silent individual brainstorming (10 minutes)

Set the timer for 10 minutes. Everyone works in silence, writing one idea per sticky note and placing it onto the corresponding quadrant of the sailboat diagram. Participants may contribute as many or as few notes as they wish, or choose to observe without posting.

### 3. Review and thematic clustering (12 minutes)

Facilitate a read-through of the board by section: Island, Wind, Anchor, Rocks. Invite two volunteers to group similar notes into clusters without debating merit. If the group has more than 10 people, break into 2 or 3 subgroups to cluster assigned sections simultaneously.

### 4. Dot voting on top priorities (5 minutes)

Give each participant 3 sticky dots. Participants place dots on the clusters or specific notes in the Anchor or Rock categories that most require immediate team intervention. Allow 3 minutes for placing dots and 2 minutes to identify the two highest-voted topics.

### 5. Agree on action items and wrap up (13 minutes)

Focus the whole group on the top one or two clusters from the vote. Formulate 1 to 3 specific next steps. Each agreed step must name a clear outcome, an owner, and a completion date. Record these directly on the board and close the session.


## Debrief questions

- Looking at the wind category, what working practice should we deliberately protect so it continues to help us?
- Which anchor is entirely within our direct control to remove this coming sprint?
- What early indicator will tell us we are heading too close to one of our identified rocks?

**Finished output:** A clustered sailboat board highlighting team goals, strengths, and risks, plus 1 to 3 assigned action items with designated owners and deadlines.

## Remote

Use a digital whiteboard (such as Mural, Miro, or Parabol) pre-loaded with the Sailboat template. Run the 10-minute brainstorming step using private mode to keep notes hidden until reveal. Use the digital voting feature to allocate 3 votes per person, and record final actions in the shared project backlog.

## Hybrid

In-person attendees use markers and sticky notes on the physical wall while a designated hybrid scribe photographs or duplicates sticky notes onto the shared digital canvas in real time. Conduct voting directly on the digital board so remote and in-person members cast votes simultaneously on equal footing.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may submit thoughts orally to a scribe, enter text digitally, or post handwritten notes.
- Any participant may decline to post notes or pass during the debrief without explanation.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants confuse Anchors with Rocks.**

Remind the room that Anchors are issues dragging the team down right now, while Rocks are potential hazards waiting in the future.

**Brainstorming turns into an open gripe session during the writing phase.**

Enforce strict silence during the 10-minute brainstorming step. Note that open discussion happens only after all notes are clustered.


## Terms used here

- Anchor: An internal issue, process breakdown, or drag currently slowing the team down.
- Rocks: Anticipated risks, obstacles, or external dependencies ahead that could disrupt delivery.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Agile retrospective practice documentation published by Parabol and Mural. Neither source claims individual invention.

Retained the four standard Sailboat retrospective quadrants (Island/Beacon, Wind, Anchor, Rocks) and four-stage retrospective sequence (reflect, group, vote, action) evidenced across Parabol and Mural documentation. Standardized into a 45-minute structured workshop plan with clear subgroup allocations, explicit facilitator script, concrete neutral examples, and hybrid delivery specifications.

[Parabol](https://www.parabol.co/templates/sprint-retrospectives/sailboat-retrospective)

[Parabol](https://www.parabol.co/templates/sprint-retrospectives/sailboat-retrospective?utm_source=ScrumMasterToolbox)

[Parabol](https://www.parabol.co/templates/sailboat)

[Parabol](https://www.parabol.co/templates/sprint-retrospectives/sailboat-retrospective/)

[Mural Team Building & Icebreakers](https://www.mural.co/templates/sailboat-retrospective)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/sailboat-retrospective/