Read Weirdly and Widely
Participants browse an unfamiliar topic or website outside their normal field, take brief notes on surprising details, and apply one finding to their current task.
Choose this exercise
Purpose: Gather unfamiliar references from unrelated fields to generate unexpected angles for an ongoing project or discussion.
Use it when: Use before an ideation session, writing block, or panel when participants repeat the same predictable references.
Skip it when: Skip during late-stage alignment or when participants lack internet access and pre-printed reading excerpts.
Group arrangement: Individual reading, then pairs or trios, followed by brief whole-room share
Timing: Expanded from the source duration of under 5 minutes to 15 minutes to allow structured browsing, pairing, and whole-group debrief.
Materials and tools
- One smartphone, tablet, laptop, or pre-printed article pack per participant
- One index card and one pen per participant
- A display board or shared digital workspace to collect notes
- A prepared list of 4 to 6 eccentric, niche, or interdisciplinary links or articles
Before participants arrive
- Write or project a list of 4 to 6 unusual domains or topics (for example: amateur astronomy logs, municipal sewer maintenance reports, deep-sea biology logs, extreme vexillology, or vintage watch repair manuals).
- Ensure guest Wi-Fi credentials are visible if people use personal devices.
- Have 3 to 5 paper printouts ready for anyone without a working device.
Say this to open
For the next four minutes, leave your usual field behind. Pick a source from the list that you would never read on a normal workday. Read or skim it with curiosity. Your job is to find one specific fact, term, or mechanism that catches your attention, and write it on your index card.
How to run it
Introduce and assign strange topics 2 minutes
Display the topic prompt list. Deliver the opening script. Ask everyone to choose one source, open it on their device, or take a paper handout.
Browse and extract 5 minutes
Participants read individually in silence. Each person writes down on their card: 1) the surprising detail or phrase, and 2) one sentence linking that idea to the day's project. Neutral example: If the project is improving customer onboarding and the reading is on honeybee hive ventilation, the idea might be creating clear passive directional pathways instead of adding more alert notices.
Pair exchange 4 minutes
Form pairs. In odd-numbered rooms, create one trio. Each partner takes 90 seconds to explain their strange source and the single connection they made. The listener records one comment on the back of the speaker's card.
Share out and debrief 4 minutes
Invite 3 or 4 volunteers to read their connection aloud. Conclude by framing how distant concepts prevent predictable groupthink during subsequent work.
Debrief questions
- What made it easy or difficult to connect an unrelated subject to your current task?
- Which concept heard in your pair felt most different from our standard work vocabulary?
- How can you deliberately introduce unexpected reading into your routine before critical decisions?
Finished output: A set of completed index cards showing an external concept mapped to the workshop problem.
Remote
Post the curated link list in the chat. Run the individual browsing phase with cameras optional and microphones muted. Send participants to 2-person breakout rooms for four minutes. Reconvene in the main room and have participants type their best connection into the chat or paste it on a digital whiteboard.
Hybrid
Pair in-room participants with in-room partners, and pair remote participants with remote partners to avoid audio bleed. Use a single shared digital text document where both remote and in-person participants record their final card notes.
Access and participation choices
- Offer printed paper excerpts and screen-reader accessible plain text links as browsing options.
- Participants may pass on reading aloud to the whole room without giving an explanation.
If the session gets stuck
- Participants get lost scrolling social media or unrelated sites during the reading phase.
- Provide 4 specific pre-vetted links on screen or on paper instead of an open search bar, and hold strictly to the five-minute timer.
- A participant says their strange topic has zero relation to the project.
- Prompt them to take one mechanical word from the text (such as intake, buffer, plumage, insulation) and use it as a metaphor for a bottleneck in the project.
Terms used here
- Vexillology: The study of flags, often used as an example of a deep, obscure topic.
Curated Domain Starters
Run this exercise live
The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.
What participants need now
Materials:
This is a participant-safe snapshot, not a response form. It sends nothing back to the facilitator.
Run this with your AI assistant +
Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.
Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step. Reference revision: a7ec03874198ebe2a19174d5ea76c20f7253082ed7234667c8b21cc23fbae735 # Read Weirdly and Widely Participants browse an unfamiliar topic or website outside their normal field, take brief notes on surprising details, and apply one finding to their current task. **Time:** 15 minutes. Expanded from the source duration of under 5 minutes to 15 minutes to allow structured browsing, pairing, and whole-group debrief. **People:** 4 to 24. Individual reading, then pairs or trios, followed by brief whole-room share ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Gather unfamiliar references from unrelated fields to generate unexpected angles for an ongoing project or discussion. **Use it when:** Use before an ideation session, writing block, or panel when participants repeat the same predictable references. **Skip it when:** Skip during late-stage alignment or when participants lack internet access and pre-printed reading excerpts. ## Materials and tools - One smartphone, tablet, laptop, or pre-printed article pack per participant - One index card and one pen per participant - A display board or shared digital workspace to collect notes - A prepared list of 4 to 6 eccentric, niche, or interdisciplinary links or articles ## Before participants arrive 1. Write or project a list of 4 to 6 unusual domains or topics (for example: amateur astronomy logs, municipal sewer maintenance reports, deep-sea biology logs, extreme vexillology, or vintage watch repair manuals). 2. Ensure guest Wi-Fi credentials are visible if people use personal devices. 3. Have 3 to 5 paper printouts ready for anyone without a working device. ## Say this to open For the next four minutes, leave your usual field behind. Pick a source from the list that you would never read on a normal workday. Read or skim it with curiosity. Your job is to find one specific fact, term, or mechanism that catches your attention, and write it on your index card. ## How to run it ### 1. Introduce and assign strange topics (2 minutes) Display the topic prompt list. Deliver the opening script. Ask everyone to choose one source, open it on their device, or take a paper handout. ### 2. Browse and extract (5 minutes) Participants read individually in silence. Each person writes down on their card: 1) the surprising detail or phrase, and 2) one sentence linking that idea to the day's project. Neutral example: If the project is improving customer onboarding and the reading is on honeybee hive ventilation, the idea might be creating clear passive directional pathways instead of adding more alert notices. ### 3. Pair exchange (4 minutes) Form pairs. In odd-numbered rooms, create one trio. Each partner takes 90 seconds to explain their strange source and the single connection they made. The listener records one comment on the back of the speaker's card. ### 4. Share out and debrief (4 minutes) Invite 3 or 4 volunteers to read their connection aloud. Conclude by framing how distant concepts prevent predictable groupthink during subsequent work. ## Debrief questions - What made it easy or difficult to connect an unrelated subject to your current task? - Which concept heard in your pair felt most different from our standard work vocabulary? - How can you deliberately introduce unexpected reading into your routine before critical decisions? **Finished output:** A set of completed index cards showing an external concept mapped to the workshop problem. ## Remote Post the curated link list in the chat. Run the individual browsing phase with cameras optional and microphones muted. Send participants to 2-person breakout rooms for four minutes. Reconvene in the main room and have participants type their best connection into the chat or paste it on a digital whiteboard. ## Hybrid Pair in-room participants with in-room partners, and pair remote participants with remote partners to avoid audio bleed. Use a single shared digital text document where both remote and in-person participants record their final card notes. ## Access and participation choices - Offer printed paper excerpts and screen-reader accessible plain text links as browsing options. - Participants may pass on reading aloud to the whole room without giving an explanation. ## If the session gets stuck **Participants get lost scrolling social media or unrelated sites during the reading phase.** Provide 4 specific pre-vetted links on screen or on paper instead of an open search bar, and hold strictly to the five-minute timer. **A participant says their strange topic has zero relation to the project.** Prompt them to take one mechanical word from the text (such as intake, buffer, plumage, insulation) and use it as a metaphor for a bottleneck in the project. ## Terms used here - Vexillology: The study of flags, often used as an example of a deep, obscure topic. ## Participant material: Curated Domain Starters Choose one topic to read for 5 minutes: 1. Deep-sea bioluminescence: mechanisms of light production in benthic zones. 2. Railway signaling history: the block system and mechanical interlocks. 3. Mycology foraging handbooks: spore distribution and mycelial networks. 4. Horology: escapement mechanisms and friction reduction in mechanical clocks. 5. Traditional dry-stone walling: friction, gravity, and interlocking without mortar. ## Sources and adaptation Observed in Relationship Makers Handbook, pages 336-337, titled 'Read Weirdly & Widely'. The original source (Relationship Makers Handbook) provides an open concept of browsing weird websites in under 5 minutes with smartphone/tablet/paper. UWT formalized the timing into a reliable 15-minute sequence, added a curated starter list to prevent wandering, and structured pair sharing with a concrete bridging prompt. Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/read-weirdly-widely/
Sources and adaptation
Observed in Relationship Makers Handbook, pages 336-337, titled 'Read Weirdly & Widely'.
The original source (Relationship Makers Handbook) provides an open concept of browsing weird websites in under 5 minutes with smartphone/tablet/paper. UWT formalized the timing into a reliable 15-minute sequence, added a curated starter list to prevent wandering, and structured pair sharing with a concrete bridging prompt.
See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.