Now, Next, Later
Participants write candidate tasks or project ideas onto sticky notes and place them into three time horizons: Now, Next, or Later. The group negotiates placement, caps items in Now, assigns immediate owners, and agrees on a review date.
Choose this exercise
Purpose: Organize a collection of tasks or project ideas into immediate, near-term, and distant time horizons with agreed owners on current work.
Use it when: Use when a team has competing initiatives, needs to prioritize a backlog, or wants to focus on immediate work without discarding future ideas.
Skip it when: Skip when work requires strict critical-path dependency charts or when rigid legal and regulatory deadlines dictate exact delivery dates.
Group arrangement: Individual note writing followed by whole-group placement and review around a shared board.
Timing: Participatory Methods cites 10 to 60 minutes. 45 minutes provides balanced time for silent writing, posting, systematic negotiation, and owner assignment for up to 15 people.
Materials and tools
- Pad of 3x3 inch sticky notes per participant (or digital equivalent)
- 1 fine-tip dark marker per participant
- Large whiteboard or wall space with painter tape
- 3 printed or hand-lettered column headers: 'Now', 'Next', 'Later'
- Digital whiteboard platform (e.g., Miro, Mural) with three preset columns for remote or hybrid delivery
- Digital camera, phone, or shared document to record final output
- Visual countdown timer
Before participants arrive
- Clear a wide wall or whiteboard visible to all participants.
- Divide the wall into three vertical columns labeled 'Now', 'Next', and 'Later'.
- Distribute sticky notes and markers to every seat, or launch and test the digital board if running online or hybrid.
Say this to open
We have many tasks and ideas competing for our time. Today we sort them into three time buckets: Now, Next, and Later. 'Now' means immediate actions we start right away with high urgency or high impact. 'Next' means important work that will follow once Now is moving. 'Later' means ideas or tasks we hold for future review so they do not distract us today. Take markers and sticky notes. Write one task or idea per note in clear print. Limit yourself to three notes maximum.
How to run it
Introduce buckets and write notes 5 minutes
Explain the three categories using the opening script. Direct participants to write their candidate tasks or project ideas silently on sticky notes, one item per note. Enforce a hard cap of 2 to 3 notes per person so the board holds at most 30 to 45 notes.
Post notes to columns 8 minutes
Invite participants to post their notes into the column they think fits best. Call people up in waves of 3 to 4 to prevent crowding around the board. Participants place duplicate or related ideas side by side. Silence is fine during posting.
Negotiate and adjust columns 18 minutes
Review the board column by column, starting with Now, then Next, then Later. Cluster obvious duplicates immediately. Read each note aloud. If anyone questions a placement, ask: 'Does this stay here or move?' Start a 60-second visual timer for that note. If the room does not reach consensus before the timer beeps, apply the default rule: move the contested item one column to the right (from Now to Next, or from Next to Later). Cap the final Now column at no more than 5 total items.
Assign owners and set review dates 10 minutes
Walk down each remaining item in the Now column. Ask for an individual owner and an immediate next check-in date. Write the name directly on the note. If an item in Now finds no willing owner, move it to Next immediately. For the Next and Later columns, establish one calendar date when the team will re-open and review the board.
Debrief and record 4 minutes
Run a brief whole-room reflection using the debrief questions. Take two or three short comments from volunteers. Designate one person to photograph or transcribe the final board into the team repository.
Debrief questions
- Looking at the final Now column, is this workload realistic for our team right now?
- Which task was hardest to push into Next or Later, and what made it hard?
- What is our exact trigger or date to review the Next column?
Finished output: A visible three-column board displaying categorized tasks, with every remaining Now item assigned to a specific owner, photographed or transcribed into team records.
Remote
Set up a digital whiteboard with three columns labeled Now, Next, and Later. Participants type up to three digital sticky notes during step 1. During step 2, participants drag their notes to their chosen columns. In step 3, the facilitator shares their screen, groups duplicates, and uses an on-screen timer for contested items. In step 4, the facilitator types volunteer owners directly onto the digital notes.
Hybrid
Maintain the primary board on a digital whiteboard that both room and remote participants can edit. Project the board onto the room screen. Remote and in-person participants add digital notes simultaneously. Ensure an in-room facilitator reads remote chat comments aloud during negotiations, and ensure remote members have equal turns to volunteer for Now items.
Access and participation choices
- Participants may type notes into chat or ask a partner to write and post them if reaching the board is difficult.
- Anyone may pass on contributing individual notes during the writing step and instead participate solely in sorting and discussion.
- Volunteering to own a Now item is voluntary; any Now item that does not receive an owner is shifted to Next rather than forced onto someone.
If the session gets stuck
- The Now column contains too many items for the team to realistically complete.
- Enforce the hard ceiling of 5 items. Ask the group: 'If we can only ship three of these this month, which two move to Next?'
- Two participants enter a prolonged debate about whether an item is Now or Later.
- Point to the 60-second timer. If time expires without consensus, invoke the default rule and move the item to Next until required prerequisites are settled.
- An item left in Now has no volunteer willing to own it.
- Do not force assignment. Move the unowned item into Next and note that it stays pending until an owner becomes available.
Terms used here
- Temporal priority: Organizing work based on when it must be tackled rather than how appealing or high-profile it sounds.
Run this exercise live
The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.
What participants need now
Materials:
This is a participant-safe snapshot, not a response form. It sends nothing back to the facilitator.
Run this with your AI assistant +
Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.
Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step. Reference revision: 4afaa4551c857d2342ed02d2a3acaba8773c00fd07928b0f91fb1d4cefad00e9 # Now, Next, Later Participants write candidate tasks or project ideas onto sticky notes and place them into three time horizons: Now, Next, or Later. The group negotiates placement, caps items in Now, assigns immediate owners, and agrees on a review date. **Time:** 45 minutes. Participatory Methods cites 10 to 60 minutes. 45 minutes provides balanced time for silent writing, posting, systematic negotiation, and owner assignment for up to 15 people. **People:** 4 to 15. Individual note writing followed by whole-group placement and review around a shared board. ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Organize a collection of tasks or project ideas into immediate, near-term, and distant time horizons with agreed owners on current work. **Use it when:** Use when a team has competing initiatives, needs to prioritize a backlog, or wants to focus on immediate work without discarding future ideas. **Skip it when:** Skip when work requires strict critical-path dependency charts or when rigid legal and regulatory deadlines dictate exact delivery dates. ## Materials and tools - Pad of 3x3 inch sticky notes per participant (or digital equivalent) - 1 fine-tip dark marker per participant - Large whiteboard or wall space with painter tape - 3 printed or hand-lettered column headers: 'Now', 'Next', 'Later' - Digital whiteboard platform (e.g., Miro, Mural) with three preset columns for remote or hybrid delivery - Digital camera, phone, or shared document to record final output - Visual countdown timer ## Before participants arrive 1. Clear a wide wall or whiteboard visible to all participants. 2. Divide the wall into three vertical columns labeled 'Now', 'Next', and 'Later'. 3. Distribute sticky notes and markers to every seat, or launch and test the digital board if running online or hybrid. ## Say this to open We have many tasks and ideas competing for our time. Today we sort them into three time buckets: Now, Next, and Later. 'Now' means immediate actions we start right away with high urgency or high impact. 'Next' means important work that will follow once Now is moving. 'Later' means ideas or tasks we hold for future review so they do not distract us today. Take markers and sticky notes. Write one task or idea per note in clear print. Limit yourself to three notes maximum. ## How to run it ### 1. Introduce buckets and write notes (5 minutes) Explain the three categories using the opening script. Direct participants to write their candidate tasks or project ideas silently on sticky notes, one item per note. Enforce a hard cap of 2 to 3 notes per person so the board holds at most 30 to 45 notes. ### 2. Post notes to columns (8 minutes) Invite participants to post their notes into the column they think fits best. Call people up in waves of 3 to 4 to prevent crowding around the board. Participants place duplicate or related ideas side by side. Silence is fine during posting. ### 3. Negotiate and adjust columns (18 minutes) Review the board column by column, starting with Now, then Next, then Later. Cluster obvious duplicates immediately. Read each note aloud. If anyone questions a placement, ask: 'Does this stay here or move?' Start a 60-second visual timer for that note. If the room does not reach consensus before the timer beeps, apply the default rule: move the contested item one column to the right (from Now to Next, or from Next to Later). Cap the final Now column at no more than 5 total items. ### 4. Assign owners and set review dates (10 minutes) Walk down each remaining item in the Now column. Ask for an individual owner and an immediate next check-in date. Write the name directly on the note. If an item in Now finds no willing owner, move it to Next immediately. For the Next and Later columns, establish one calendar date when the team will re-open and review the board. ### 5. Debrief and record (4 minutes) Run a brief whole-room reflection using the debrief questions. Take two or three short comments from volunteers. Designate one person to photograph or transcribe the final board into the team repository. ## Debrief questions - Looking at the final Now column, is this workload realistic for our team right now? - Which task was hardest to push into Next or Later, and what made it hard? - What is our exact trigger or date to review the Next column? **Finished output:** A visible three-column board displaying categorized tasks, with every remaining Now item assigned to a specific owner, photographed or transcribed into team records. ## Remote Set up a digital whiteboard with three columns labeled Now, Next, and Later. Participants type up to three digital sticky notes during step 1. During step 2, participants drag their notes to their chosen columns. In step 3, the facilitator shares their screen, groups duplicates, and uses an on-screen timer for contested items. In step 4, the facilitator types volunteer owners directly onto the digital notes. ## Hybrid Maintain the primary board on a digital whiteboard that both room and remote participants can edit. Project the board onto the room screen. Remote and in-person participants add digital notes simultaneously. Ensure an in-room facilitator reads remote chat comments aloud during negotiations, and ensure remote members have equal turns to volunteer for Now items. ## Access and participation choices - Participants may type notes into chat or ask a partner to write and post them if reaching the board is difficult. - Anyone may pass on contributing individual notes during the writing step and instead participate solely in sorting and discussion. - Volunteering to own a Now item is voluntary; any Now item that does not receive an owner is shifted to Next rather than forced onto someone. ## If the session gets stuck **The Now column contains too many items for the team to realistically complete.** Enforce the hard ceiling of 5 items. Ask the group: 'If we can only ship three of these this month, which two move to Next?' **Two participants enter a prolonged debate about whether an item is Now or Later.** Point to the 60-second timer. If time expires without consensus, invoke the default rule and move the item to Next until required prerequisites are settled. **An item left in Now has no volunteer willing to own it.** Do not force assignment. Move the unowned item into Next and note that it stays pending until an owner becomes available. ## Terms used here - Temporal priority: Organizing work based on when it must be tackled rather than how appealing or high-profile it sounds. ## Sources and adaptation Observed in Participatory Methods repository under the title 'Now, Next, Later'. Retained the three-column horizon structure (Now, Next, Later) and group review mechanics from Participatory Methods. UWT expanded the run time to 45 minutes, capped individual submissions at 3 notes per person to make group negotiation feasible, added an explicit 60-second timer with a default move-right rule for disputed items, instituted a maximum cap of 5 items in Now, and established that unowned Now items automatically drop to Next. [Participatory Methods](https://participatorymethods.com/activities/now-next-later/) Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/now-next-later/
Sources and adaptation
Observed in Participatory Methods repository under the title 'Now, Next, Later'.
Retained the three-column horizon structure (Now, Next, Later) and group review mechanics from Participatory Methods. UWT expanded the run time to 45 minutes, capped individual submissions at 3 notes per person to make group negotiation feasible, added an explicit 60-second timer with a default move-right rule for disputed items, instituted a maximum cap of 5 items in Now, and established that unowned Now items automatically drop to Next.
See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.