Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 716eaca1e5dbd6d21cd9407a03a391e80a3a81aa77fc3ca8a366deb072373695

# Idea Storm

Small groups generate initial solutions on sectioned worksheets, pass them to critique potential failure points, pass again to resolve those critiques, and return them to the author.

**Time:** 25 minutes. Within the 15 to 30 minute range documented in Participatory Methods sources; 25 minutes allows complete passing and review cycles.
**People:** 4 to 24. Table circles of 3, 4, or 5 people; individual writing followed by sequential passing in one direction.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Test and develop initial concept sketches by having peers surface vulnerabilities and engineer workable improvements before open discussion.
**Use it when:** When teams need to test early ideas and push past superficial brainstorming without single-voice dominance.
**Skip it when:** When a team needs quick prioritization of known backlog items rather than iterative concept development.

## Materials and tools

- One four-section Idea Storm worksheet per participant (or blank paper folded into four rows)
- One pen or pencil per participant
- One countdown timer visible to the room
- Flipchart and marker for the facilitator

## Before participants arrive

1. Write the central design challenge visibly on a flipchart or shared slide.
2. Arrange seating into tables or circles of 3 to 5 chairs. Never create pairs of 2, as 2 cannot provide two distinct peer reviewers.
3. Place one worksheet and one pen at each seat.

## Say this to open

Welcome. Today we will build and stress-test ideas through a sequential passing process called Idea Storm. You will each start by sketching a bold solution to our central challenge. Then you will pass your sheet so a peer can identify where it might break, and pass it again so another peer can fix that flaw. The goal is not defensive perfection, but making ideas stronger together.

## How to run it

### 1. Set challenge and write initial idea (5 minutes)

Present the design challenge. Ask everyone to write the challenge prompt in the top box of their worksheet, then spend 3 minutes writing a bold, unconventional solution in Section 1. Example: If the challenge is 'reduce meeting fatigue', an unconventional idea might be 'cancel all standing status meetings and replace them with five-minute recorded voice memos'. Stopping condition: Pens down when the timer sounds.

### 2. Pass and critique (4 minutes)

Instruct everyone to pass their worksheet to the person on their left. Participants read the proposal in Section 1 silently. In Section 2, they write one specific vulnerability, flaw, or reason why this idea might fail. Example critique: 'People will record 20-minute rambling voice memos, making listening take twice as long as the original meeting.' Stopping condition: Facilitator calls time at 4 minutes.

### 3. Pass and solve critique (4 minutes)

Instruct everyone to pass the sheet to their left once more. Participants read the original idea in Section 1 and the critique in Section 2. In Section 3, they write a concrete modification or guardrail to solve the critique. Example solution: 'Enforce a hard software limit of 90 seconds per memo, with automatic transcription bullet points.' Stopping condition: Facilitator calls time at 4 minutes.

### 4. Return, synthesize, and table share (7 minutes)

Instruct everyone to pass their sheet to the left once more so every sheet returns to its author (in a circle of 3, the second pass reaches the third member, and the third pass returns it to author). Authors spend 2 minutes reviewing the feedback and drafting their revised takeaway in Section 4. Then each person takes up to 45 seconds to share their before-and-after concept with their table group.

### 5. Debrief (5 minutes)

Gather whole-room attention. Ask 2 or 3 volunteers from different tables to share how an idea transformed between Section 1 and Section 3, then conduct the debrief reflection.


## Debrief questions

- How did seeing a potential point of failure change the way the idea was developed?
- What difference did you notice between writing a critique silently versus debating it aloud?
- Which modified ideas are viable enough to explore in your next planning step?

**Finished output:** Completed multi-stage worksheets containing original proposals, peer critiques, and proposed redesigns for every participant.

## Remote

Create a shared digital whiteboard (Miro, Mural, or Conceptboard) with one four-quadrant frame per participant in breakout rooms of 3 to 5 people. In step 1, participants write on their own numbered frame. In step 2, everyone moves to frame N+1 to post a critique sticky note. In step 3, everyone moves to frame N+2 to post a solution sticky note. In step 4, everyone returns to their original frame to synthesize.

## Hybrid

Keep all participants on the shared digital whiteboard with in-room participants using laptops or tablets. If in-person participants work on paper while remote participants use a breakout room with digital cards, the facilitator photos or types the 2 or 3 volunteered paper concepts into the shared video call screen before starting the joint debrief.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may draw diagrams, write bullet points, or dictate their notes to a table partner.
- Anyone may choose to pass without reading their concept aloud during small-group or whole-room sharing.

## If the session gets stuck

**A critique is written as an attack on the person rather than the concept mechanics.**

Remind the room before passing that critiques must focus strictly on operational hurdles, unstated assumptions, or resource gaps, not personal competence.

**Room attendance leaves an awkward group size such as 6 participants.**

Do not split 6 people into 4 and 2. Divide 6 into two tables of 3, or keep them as one table of 6. In a circle of 3, passing left ensures participant A passes to B for critique, B passes to C for solution, and C passes back to A, keeping two distinct peer contributors without repeating.


## Terms used here

- Round Robin: A structured brainstorming method where ideas circulate sequentially through a group so each person contributes to every item.

## Participant material: Idea Storm Worksheet

CHALLENGE PROMPT:
[Write the group challenge here]

SECTION 1: UNCONVENTIONAL SOLUTION (Author)
Describe your idea. What would you build or do if typical constraints were removed?

------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 2: CRITIQUE & FAILURE POINTS (Reviewer 1)
Pass to the left. Read Section 1. Where might this fail? What unstated assumption is risky?

------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 3: COUNTERMEASURE & REDESIGN (Reviewer 2)
Pass to the left. Read Sections 1 and 2. How can we fix the critique and make the solution viable?

------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 4: FINAL EVOLVED CONCEPT (Original Author)
Return to original author. Review all entries. Summarize your revised proposal:

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Participatory Methods documentation (2025), which cites inspiration from the Round Robin method (LUMA Institute / Google Design Sprints).

Retained the four-phase worksheet structure (challenge/initial idea, critique, improvement, author review) and group rotation documented by Participatory Methods. Added concrete neutral examples, precise group division rules for all numbers from 4 to 24, explicit time allocations totaling 25 minutes, hybrid sharing mechanics, and an exact printable worksheet template.

[Participatory Methods](https://participatorymethods.com/activities/idea-storm/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/idea-storm/