United We TransformCreate teamsGrade your agenda
Exercises/Reflection and Learning/EASY MONEY
Team Reflection ยท Reflection and Learning

EASY MONEY

EASY MONEY is a team reflection exercise for reflection and learning: it helps participants reflect on experience and turn observations into learning.

5 to 15 minutesTIME
Medium group (9-25)GROUP SIZE
ActiveENERGY
In person, RemoteSETTING
High cognitive loadCOGNITIVE LOAD
Strengthens Learning Transfer This reflection and learning exercise strengthens Learning Transfer, one of the eight Gathering Effectiveness pillars.

How to run it

  1. Collect the envelopes. Do this after 3 minutes. Make sure that the investors' initials are written on each envelope.
  2. Conduct an audit. Give the envelope to one of the players (the auditor) and ask him or her to count the money inside each envelope, record the amount on the face of the envelope, put the money back in the envelope, and compute the total.
  3. Ask for predictions. While the auditor is counting and computing, ask the other players to predict the total amount. Ask the players to justify their predictions.
  4. Announce the results. Ask the auditor to report the total amount of investment in the envelopes.
  5. If this amount is more than (or equal to) $79.79, give each investor $10. Keep the envelopes with the money.
  6. If the amount is less than $79.79, keep the envelopes with the money. Explain that nobody receives $10 because the investors did not meet the minimum requirement.
  7. Ask the auditor to read the investment amounts in each envelope, without identifying the investor.
Live facilitator

Run this exercise live

The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.

Prompts to use +

Conduct an audit. Give the envelope to one of the players (the auditor) and ask him or her to count the money inside each envelope, record the amount on the face of the envelope, put the money back in the envelope, and compute the total.

Ask for predictions. While the auditor is counting and computing, ask the other players to predict the total amount. Ask the players to justify their predictions.

Announce the results. Ask the auditor to report the total amount of investment in the envelopes.

If this amount is more than (or equal to) $79.79, give each investor $10. Keep the envelopes with the money.

If the amount is less than $79.79, keep the envelopes with the money. Explain that nobody receives $10 because the investors did not meet the minimum requirement.

Ask the auditor to read the investment amounts in each envelope, without identifying the investor.

Run this with your AI assistant +

Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Adapt this exercise for my exact room. Exercise: EASY MONEY. Readiness: Publishable Draft. Core moves: Conduct an audit. Give the envelope to one of the players (the auditor) and ask him or her to count the money inside each envelope, record the amount on the face of the envelope, put the money back in the envelope, and compute the total.; Ask for predictions. While the auditor is counting and computing, ask the other players to predict the total amount. Ask the players to justify their predictions.; Announce the results. Ask the auditor to report the total amount of investment in the envelopes.; If this amount is more than (or equal to) $79.79, give each investor $10. Keep the envelopes with the money.. Return a concise facilitator script with timing, wording, safety notes, and remote/in-person adjustments.

Origin unverified

  • Where we observed it: The strongest current observations come from The Thiagi Group; aggregators are listed as additional observations, not origin proof. (1 source observed, including The Thiagi Group.)
  • What that means: we track where an exercise has been observed in public sources. We do not claim to know who created it, or how popular it is.
  • No efficacy claims: appearing in this library is not a claim that the exercise is proven effective. Facilitator judgment and context decide whether it works for a given room.
  • Corrections: if you have evidence of an earlier or more accurate source, read our methodology and trust boundary and tell us.

Pairs well with