Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: be21a61cae09544b2448d99a76f4fdd4bcdd2a7fc30cef3ee34ce9ae6a672590

# Reducing Duplication of Work

Participants examine past instances where team members unknowingly worked on identical tasks. They then rewrite the assignment and visibility steps of their workflow to prevent duplicate effort.

**Time:** 60 minutes. Matches the 60-minute duration outlined in the source.
**People:** 3 to 24. Small groups of 3 to 4 (or a single group for 3 to 5), then pairs or trios for workflow redesign, ending with full-group debrief.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Identify process gaps that cause overlapping tasks and rewrite workflow handoffs to ensure explicit assignment and visible progress.
**Use it when:** Use when remote or cross-functional teams report wasted effort, siloed work, or confusion about who owns specific deliverables.
**Skip it when:** Skip when team roles are strictly serial and independent, or when the primary issue is resource scarcity rather than coordination.

## Materials and tools

- Poll tool or index cards for anonymous frequency ratings
- One workflow worksheet or shared digital document per participant
- Pens or digital typing access
- Visible timer

## Before participants arrive

1. Set up the anonymous poll: 'How often do you find out that someone else was working on the same thing as you? (1 = Never, 5 = Very Often)'.
2. Prepare breakout groups of 3 or 4 participants, keeping 3 to 5 as a single group if total attendance is small.
3. Distribute the Workflow Rework Worksheet or share the link to a collaborative document.

## Say this to open

Today, we will explore why duplication of work happens in virtual and distributed teams, and how we can improve coordination to avoid wasted effort. We will look at how often this happens, analyze real examples, and redesign our handoffs so work is clearly visible.

## How to run it

### 1. Poll and baseline common causes (10 minutes)

Speak the opening script. Launch the anonymous poll asking how often participants find themselves working on the same task as someone else (scale 1 to 5). Reveal the aggregated score. Ask two or three volunteers to name common systemic causes, focusing on visibility, handoffs, and central tracking rather than individual blame.

### 2. Analyze past overlaps in small groups (15 minutes)

Divide participants into groups of 3 or 4 (or keep 3 to 5 together in one group). Direct each group to review personal examples of overlapping work. Ask them to identify what triggered the duplication, such as missing task ownership, separate tools, or siloed planning. Have each group note one clear scenario to bring back to the room.

### 3. Introduce prevention strategies and share tools (15 minutes)

Bring the full group back. Introduce three core prevention principles: increase visibility through central task lists, clarify single ownership for deliverables, and check in before starting ambiguous work. Ask everyone to write one existing tool or habit that successfully stops duplicate work in the chat or on a sticky note. Highlight two practical habits.

### 4. Rework workflows in pairs (15 minutes)

Pair participants up, using a trio if numbers are odd. Each person writes down a concise example of a past duplication incident on their worksheet, describing what went wrong. Partners swap scenarios or select one case. Together, rewrite the workflow steps to show how central tracking or explicit handoffs would prevent the overlap. Invite two pairs to read their before-and-after adjustments to the room.

### 5. Commit to action and close (5 minutes)

Ask every participant to write down one specific personal action or process agreement they will adopt this week to make their work visible. Run a closing poll: 'How confident do you feel about preventing duplication in your team? (1 = Not confident, 5 = Very confident)'. Thank the group and collect worksheets.


## Debrief questions

- What step in our typical workflow creates the biggest blind spot for other team members?
- Which single adjustment gives us the highest visibility without adding unnecessary status meetings?

**Finished output:** Completed workflow redesign worksheets and an individual action commitment from each participant.

## Remote

Run via video meeting platform with breakout rooms. Use an online polling tool for the baseline and closing questions. Use a shared document or virtual whiteboard where pairs can type their before-and-after workflow steps in separate assigned blocks.

## Hybrid

Pair in-person participants with in-person partners and remote participants with remote breakout rooms. Ensure all written workflows and poll submissions are entered into the shared online document so all participants see the findings simultaneously.

## Access and participation choices

- Offer both verbal and text-based participation during debriefs and idea collection.
- Participants may describe a neutral or hypothetical duplication scenario if sharing a live project feels uncomfortable or politically sensitive.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participant counts such as 5 cannot be split into standard subgroups of 3 or 4.**

Keep 3, 4, or 5 participants together as a single discussion group in Step 2. In Step 4, form one pair and one trio.

**Participants turn the discussion into a blame session regarding specific colleagues.**

Intervene immediately and redirect focus: 'Keep the focus on the system, tools, and notification routines, not on personal faults.'


## Terms used here

- Task visibility: The ability for all team members to see who is currently working on an assignment without needing to ask directly.
- Ownership clarity: Assigning one specific person directly responsible for finishing a deliverable, even if others help.

## Participant material: Workflow Rework Worksheet

WORKFLOW REWORK WORKSHEET

Part 1: The Duplication Problem
Briefly describe a recent situation where duplicate work occurred.
What was the deliverable?
Who was involved?
Where did the breakdown happen? (e.g., missing task card, separate email threads, assumed ownership)

Example Breakdown: Two analysts each built a client reporting dashboard because neither knew the other received the request.

Part 2: Redesigned Workflow
Rewrite the workflow steps so this overlap cannot happen.
1. Trigger / Intake: How does the request arrive, and where is it logged publicly?
2. Assignment / Ownership: Who names the single owner, and where is this recorded?
3. Visibility: How do other team members see that work is underway?

Example Redesign: All dashboard requests must be logged on the shared board within 1 hour of receipt. The project lead assigns a single owner on the card. Status changes to 'In Progress' before drafting begins.

Part 3: Personal Action Commitment
One practical habit I will use this week to keep my work visible:

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in WorkshopBank as 'Reducing Duplication of Work in Remote Teams'.

Retained the five-phase 60-minute structure, poll questions, and workflow rewriting exercise from the WorkshopBank outline. UWT created the printable Workflow Rework Worksheet, defined pairing mechanics, added small-group handling rules for odd group sizes, and added hybrid instructions.

[WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/tools/duplication-of-work-in-remote-teams)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/duplication-of-work-workshopbank/