Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: f63019a57227b2ffeb2a2bb91a4739a85f9c19b1b8c2844c282d6bebc496b341

# DISC Team Style Mapping and Norms

Participants map their individual DISC profiles onto a team quadrant, test style-based problem solving in small groups, and establish concrete working norms.

**Time:** 120 minutes. Source workshop design specifies 120 minutes across 6 timed segments.
**People:** 4 to 24. Solo reflection, paired cross-style conversations, small style-alike and mixed groups, and whole-room alignment.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Map individual communication preferences across four behavioral quadrants to establish explicit team working agreements.
**Use it when:** Use when an intact team experiences friction, miscommunication, or project delays caused by differing pacing, detail, or decision-making styles.
**Skip it when:** Skip if participants have not completed a valid DISC self-assessment, or if active personal conflict makes behavioral labeling risky.

## Materials and tools

- Pre-completed DISC profile summary printed for each participant
- 1 wall-sized DISC quadrant poster (marked with Task vs. People and Fast-paced vs. Reserved axes)
- 1 roll of painter's tape to secure the quadrant poster to the wall
- Sticky notes (at least 3 per person)
- Dark marking pens (1 per person)
- 1 flip chart pad and easel
- Printed Personal Commitment Cards (1 per person)
- Printed Team Tension Scenario Cards (1 per small group or table)
- Shared digital whiteboard and online form (for remote or hybrid delivery)

## Before participants arrive

1. Verify all participants have their individual DISC profile results in hand before the session begins.
2. Hang the large 2x2 DISC quadrant poster on the wall using painter's tape: vertical axis labeled 'Task-focused' at top and 'People-focused' at bottom; horizontal axis labeled 'Reserved' on left and 'Fast-paced' on right. Label the four boxes D (top right), I (bottom right), S (bottom left), and C (top left).
3. Prepare flip chart sheets for capturing opening words, scenario insights, and final team norms.

## Say this to open

Welcome. Today we look at how our communication styles shape how we work together. We use the DISC framework, which focuses on observable behavioral tendencies, not fixed personality traits or competence. No style is better or worse than another, and every team needs all four. We will map where we sit, examine where misunderstandings happen, and set a few shared ground rules for how we collaborate.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce framework and dimensions (20 minutes)

Speak the opening script. Ask each person for one word describing how they prefer to work; write words on a flip chart. Draw the two axes: task versus people orientation, and fast versus reserved pacing. Briefly explain each style: D pushes for quick decisions, I builds connection, S anchors stability, and C protects quality and accuracy.

### 2. Review profiles and share in pairs (25 minutes)

Participants spend 10 minutes reviewing their printed profile summaries. Give 5 minutes for silent reflection on their primary strength and a recent friction point. Next, form cross-style pairs for 10 minutes. If the room is skewed, pair people with the most dissimilar available styles. If odd, form one trio. Partners share their top strength, one working need, and one growth area.

### 3. Map the team quadrant and analyze gaps (20 minutes)

Ask everyone to write their name on a sticky note using a dark marking pen and place it in their primary quadrant on the wall map. Give the room 3 minutes to observe the distribution. Facilitate a 17-minute discussion on concentrations and empty zones. Ask: What strengths emerge from our clusters? Where might our blind spots or friction points sit?

### 4. Run communication adaptation rounds (20 minutes)

Round 1 (7 min): Form style-alike groups. If a style has fewer than 3 participants, combine with an adjacent style (D with I, C with S) or form pairs. Split clusters over 6. Groups plan a project pitch to leadership. One speaker per group gives a 30-second readout on natural approach, focus, and timeline. Round 2 (13 min): Remix into mixed teams of 3 to 4 with diverse styles. Groups design a response plan for an urgent deliverable error that honors all four styles. Each group gives a 1-minute readout.

### 5. Analyze tension scenarios and draft individual actions (25 minutes)

Distribute Team Tension Scenario Cards. Spend 15 minutes analyzing scenarios as a whole room: explore Scenario 1 in depth, asking what each style needs, the core value conflict, and a workable compromise. Address Scenario 2 or 3 briefly if time permits. Hand out Personal Commitment Cards. Participants take 10 minutes to write privately: one personal adaptation, one individual working need, and one proposed team norm.

### 6. Agree on team norms and close (10 minutes)

Guide the room to agree on 3 to 5 shared working agreements from the cards, such as setting agendas 24 hours ahead or setting decision deadlines. Record these on a flip chart. Pose one debrief question from the list that reflects on the team map or agreed norms, inviting 2 or 3 volunteers to answer. Close with a 3-minute circle where each person shares one word describing their view of the team now.


## Debrief questions

- Looking at our team map, what natural blind spot does our group need to watch for during tight deadlines?
- When your preferred style clashes with a teammate's style, what practical adjustment can you make before reacting?
- Which of the team norms we recorded today will have the most immediate effect on our daily meetings?

**Finished output:** A posted team DISC distribution map, individual completed commitment cards, and a flip chart list of 3 to 5 agreed team working norms.

## Remote

Use the shared digital whiteboard with a pre-drawn DISC quadrant for the team map in Step 3, where participants place digital sticky notes with their names. Use breakout rooms for the pair share in Step 2 and the small-group adaptation rounds in Step 4. Use the online form for documenting commitments in Step 5 and Step 6.

## Hybrid

Provide both physical and digital quadrant boards. Use the shared digital whiteboard for the team map in Step 3, with a co-facilitator syncing sticky notes between boards. Pair remote participants together for Step 2, or use room microphones for hybrid pairs. Use the online form for documenting commitments in Step 5 and Step 6 so all members see inputs equally.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may decline to display their self-assessment results publicly by writing 'Observer' on their sticky note or placing it on an axis border.
- Provide written scenario cards and typed instructions in advance for participants who process information better through reading than listening.
- Pair sharing and action planning can be done in writing rather than spoken aloud if preferred.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants use DISC labels defensively or as excuses for poor behavior (e.g., 'I am a D, so I am naturally blunt').**

Remind the group that DISC describes behavioral tendencies and preferences, not unchangeable traits or permission to ignore team norms. Everyone can flex their communication style.

**The team map is heavily skewed, with nobody in one quadrant (e.g., zero C profiles).**

Normalize this immediately. Note that missing styles do not mean the team cannot do that work; it simply means the team must deliberately establish processes to cover that blind spot.


## Terms used here

- Dominance (D): A behavioral style characterized by directness, focus on results, fast action, and competitiveness.
- Influence (I): A behavioral style characterized by enthusiasm, social connection, optimism, and verbal collaboration.
- Steadiness (S): A behavioral style characterized by patience, dependability, deliberate pacing, and team stability.
- Conscientiousness (C): A behavioral style characterized by focus on accuracy, methodical reasoning, high standards, and process.

## Participant material: Personal Commitment Card

PERSONAL COMMITMENT CARD

1. One way I will adapt my style to collaborate better with a teammate whose style differs from mine:
   _____________________________________________________________________

2. One clear need I have from my teammates so I can do my best work:
   _____________________________________________________________________

3. One team norm or communication habit I propose our team adopts for the next 30 days:
   _____________________________________________________________________

## Participant material: Team Tension Scenario Cards

TEAM TENSION SCENARIOS

Scenario 1: Sarah (D) is frustrated that meetings drag on without clear calls. Mike (C) feels rushed and refuses to decide without deeper data analysis.

Scenario 2: Jamie (I) keeps proposing informal team social gatherings. Alex (C) views them as unproductive time away from tasks.

Scenario 3: The group must deliver critical performance feedback to a struggling colleague (S). The team feels uneasy about causing distress.

Guiding Questions for Each Scenario:
- What does each style need in this situation?
- What is the underlying value conflict?
- What practical compromise honors both styles?

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in WorkshopBank as 'DISC Workshop'. The tool adapts the DISC behavioral model originated by William Moulton Marston (1928) and later assessment frameworks developed by Walter Clarke and John Geier.

Retained the structure and prompts from WorkshopBank's 120-minute DISC Workshop plan, including quadrant mapping, style-alike and mixed adaptation rounds, tension scenario analysis, and norm-setting sequence. Adjusted timing to allocate 20 minutes to Step 4 and 25 minutes to Step 5 to ensure adequate time for individual action planning and scenario review. Added clear adjacent-pairing rules for small style clusters, explicitly linked digital whiteboard and online forms in remote/hybrid steps, and referenced marking pens in Step 3.

[WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/tools/disc-workshop)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/disc-workshop-workshopbank/