Concept Route
Small groups brainstorm key ideas on sticky notes, cluster them into central and secondary factors, and draw labeled arrows to map relationships across the topic.
Choose this exercise
Purpose: Map relationships, dependencies, and sequence between key ideas on a single visual surface.
Use it when: Use when an operational process, complex problem, or multi-stage project needs clear visual connections across different moving parts.
Skip it when: Skip when the group has not yet agreed on the core topic scope, or when simple linear task lists are needed instead of a relational network.
Group arrangement: Small teams of 3 to 5 participants working at separate chart tables or breakout boards.
Timing: Source specifies 25 to 120 minutes. 45 minutes provides a workable session for small teams.
Materials and tools
- 1 pad of sticky notes (approx. 3x3 inches) per team
- 4 fine-tip marker pens per team
- 1 sheet of chart paper (minimum 24x36 inches) or dedicated whiteboard space per team
- 1 roll of low-tack masking tape per team
- 1 visual example card displaying the 4-node sample concept route from participant materials
Before participants arrive
- Define the anchor topic or process in advance and write it visibly on the main room display.
- Set up a table or wall space for each small group with chart paper and markers.
- Display the sample concept route diagram showing the 4 connected concepts from the participant materials.
Say this to open
Welcome. Today we will build a Concept Route for our topic. A concept route maps key elements and shows exactly how they relate, depend on each other, or flow over time. You will work in small teams. First, you will write key concepts on sticky notes. Next, you will arrange them by importance and draw connecting lines with explanatory words to show how they fit together.
How to run it
Introduce topic and example 5 minutes
State the chosen anchor topic. Display the sample diagram showing the 4 connected concepts linked by labeled arrows. Divide the room into teams of 3 to 5 participants. Count off by the desired number of teams (for example, 4 teams for 16 to 20 people, 3 teams for 9 to 15 people). If remainders occur, assign extra participants to existing groups up to the maximum of 5, keeping all teams between 3 and 5 people. Answer procedural questions.
Generate individual concepts 8 minutes
Instruct participants to write one key idea, task, or condition per sticky note in silence. Each person aims for 4 to 6 notes. Anyone who prefers not to write can pair with a teammate who scribes their verbal ideas.
Cluster and prioritize 10 minutes
Teams pool their sticky notes on their table. They group duplicate ideas and distinguish central core concepts from secondary or supporting factors. Each team places their primary concepts near the center or starting point of their chart paper.
Draw the route and connections 12 minutes
Teams stick their notes onto the chart paper and draw arrows or lines between related ideas. Every arrow must have a short word describing the link, such as 'triggers', 'requires', or 'delays'. Stop when the route forms a coherent visual map.
Gallery walk and debrief 10 minutes
Teams leave their charts visible on tables or walls. Participants spend 4 minutes circulating to review other routes, leaving written reflection notes directly on posters if desired. Regroup the room and facilitate a whole-group discussion using the debrief questions. Take two to three verbal or scribed responses per question.
Debrief questions
- Which connection or dependency on your map was debated most before you reached agreement?
- Looking at other maps, what central concept did another group emphasize that your team placed on the edge?
- What is one immediate project risk or bottleneck that this route makes visible?
Finished output: A physical or digital visual concept map per team showing prioritized concepts and labeled relational arrows.
Remote
Use breakout rooms of 3 to 5 people with an online whiteboard (such as Miro, Mural, or Padlet). Pre-populate each team frame with blank digital sticky notes and directional connector tools. Keep participants on main audio for instructions, send them to breakouts for brainstorming and mapping, then bring everyone back to the main room to view shared frames simultaneously.
Hybrid
Form fully in-person groups and fully remote groups to avoid splitting attention. In-person groups use paper charts; remote groups use digital whiteboard frames. During active working phases, the facilitator alternates attention between walking tables in the room and rotating through remote breakout rooms. During the final gallery review, broadcast the digital frames on the room display while in-person groups upload a clear photo of their chart directly to the shared digital space.
Access and participation choices
- Participants may opt to speak their ideas aloud for a partner to scribe rather than writing on sticky notes.
- During the debrief, participants may speak aloud, ask a teammate to read their reflection, or post written comment notes on the charts without speaking.
- Use high-contrast markers on light paper to ensure visibility for all team members.
If the session gets stuck
- Teams draw lines between every single note, creating an unreadable spider web.
- Ask the team to remove all arrows and only draw the five most critical dependencies that cannot be broken.
- One team member dominates the note placement while others watch.
- Introduce a round-robin placement rule where each person takes turns placing and explaining one concept note at a time.
Terms used here
- Concept Route: A visual diagram mapping the relationships, dependencies, or sequence between key ideas.
Concept Route Neutral Example
Run this exercise live
The facilitator console stays in this browser. Its QR handoff is a short-lived participant snapshot containing only public exercise instructions, phase, prompt, and timer state.
What participants need now
Materials:
This is a participant-safe snapshot, not a response form. It sends nothing back to the facilitator.
Run this with your AI assistant +
Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.
Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step. Reference revision: a6551ee6009c0f391693afea02edb5af1a328ac1e8bfcbb385d7f1fd1abd63f2 # Concept Route Small groups brainstorm key ideas on sticky notes, cluster them into central and secondary factors, and draw labeled arrows to map relationships across the topic. **Time:** 45 minutes. Source specifies 25 to 120 minutes. 45 minutes provides a workable session for small teams. **People:** 4 to 20. Small teams of 3 to 5 participants working at separate chart tables or breakout boards. ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Map relationships, dependencies, and sequence between key ideas on a single visual surface. **Use it when:** Use when an operational process, complex problem, or multi-stage project needs clear visual connections across different moving parts. **Skip it when:** Skip when the group has not yet agreed on the core topic scope, or when simple linear task lists are needed instead of a relational network. ## Materials and tools - 1 pad of sticky notes (approx. 3x3 inches) per team - 4 fine-tip marker pens per team - 1 sheet of chart paper (minimum 24x36 inches) or dedicated whiteboard space per team - 1 roll of low-tack masking tape per team - 1 visual example card displaying the 4-node sample concept route from participant materials ## Before participants arrive 1. Define the anchor topic or process in advance and write it visibly on the main room display. 2. Set up a table or wall space for each small group with chart paper and markers. 3. Display the sample concept route diagram showing the 4 connected concepts from the participant materials. ## Say this to open Welcome. Today we will build a Concept Route for our topic. A concept route maps key elements and shows exactly how they relate, depend on each other, or flow over time. You will work in small teams. First, you will write key concepts on sticky notes. Next, you will arrange them by importance and draw connecting lines with explanatory words to show how they fit together. ## How to run it ### 1. Introduce topic and example (5 minutes) State the chosen anchor topic. Display the sample diagram showing the 4 connected concepts linked by labeled arrows. Divide the room into teams of 3 to 5 participants. Count off by the desired number of teams (for example, 4 teams for 16 to 20 people, 3 teams for 9 to 15 people). If remainders occur, assign extra participants to existing groups up to the maximum of 5, keeping all teams between 3 and 5 people. Answer procedural questions. ### 2. Generate individual concepts (8 minutes) Instruct participants to write one key idea, task, or condition per sticky note in silence. Each person aims for 4 to 6 notes. Anyone who prefers not to write can pair with a teammate who scribes their verbal ideas. ### 3. Cluster and prioritize (10 minutes) Teams pool their sticky notes on their table. They group duplicate ideas and distinguish central core concepts from secondary or supporting factors. Each team places their primary concepts near the center or starting point of their chart paper. ### 4. Draw the route and connections (12 minutes) Teams stick their notes onto the chart paper and draw arrows or lines between related ideas. Every arrow must have a short word describing the link, such as 'triggers', 'requires', or 'delays'. Stop when the route forms a coherent visual map. ### 5. Gallery walk and debrief (10 minutes) Teams leave their charts visible on tables or walls. Participants spend 4 minutes circulating to review other routes, leaving written reflection notes directly on posters if desired. Regroup the room and facilitate a whole-group discussion using the debrief questions. Take two to three verbal or scribed responses per question. ## Debrief questions - Which connection or dependency on your map was debated most before you reached agreement? - Looking at other maps, what central concept did another group emphasize that your team placed on the edge? - What is one immediate project risk or bottleneck that this route makes visible? **Finished output:** A physical or digital visual concept map per team showing prioritized concepts and labeled relational arrows. ## Remote Use breakout rooms of 3 to 5 people with an online whiteboard (such as Miro, Mural, or Padlet). Pre-populate each team frame with blank digital sticky notes and directional connector tools. Keep participants on main audio for instructions, send them to breakouts for brainstorming and mapping, then bring everyone back to the main room to view shared frames simultaneously. ## Hybrid Form fully in-person groups and fully remote groups to avoid splitting attention. In-person groups use paper charts; remote groups use digital whiteboard frames. During active working phases, the facilitator alternates attention between walking tables in the room and rotating through remote breakout rooms. During the final gallery review, broadcast the digital frames on the room display while in-person groups upload a clear photo of their chart directly to the shared digital space. ## Access and participation choices - Participants may opt to speak their ideas aloud for a partner to scribe rather than writing on sticky notes. - During the debrief, participants may speak aloud, ask a teammate to read their reflection, or post written comment notes on the charts without speaking. - Use high-contrast markers on light paper to ensure visibility for all team members. ## If the session gets stuck **Teams draw lines between every single note, creating an unreadable spider web.** Ask the team to remove all arrows and only draw the five most critical dependencies that cannot be broken. **One team member dominates the note placement while others watch.** Introduce a round-robin placement rule where each person takes turns placing and explaining one concept note at a time. ## Terms used here - Concept Route: A visual diagram mapping the relationships, dependencies, or sequence between key ideas. ## Participant material: Concept Route Neutral Example Sample Topic: Launching a Community Garden Concept 1: Soil Testing --> (required before) --> Concept 2: Planting Seedlings --> (depends on) --> Concept 3: Volunteer Roster --> (supports) --> Concept 4: Weekly Watering Schedule ## Sources and adaptation Observed in the Participatory Methods catalog (participatorymethods.com, 2024-2025). Retains the core visual mapping mechanic, relational line drawing, and grouping structure from Participatory Methods. UWT established a 45-minute delivery schedule across 5 steps, defined explicit arithmetic rules for group formation (3 to 5 members), added hybrid facilitator presence guidance across physical and online tables, defined explicit rules for labeled connection lines, standardized the sample diagram across all sections to four nodes, and clarified the option to provide written reflections during the gallery debrief. [Participatory Methods](https://participatorymethods.com/activities/concept-route/) Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/concept-route/
Sources and adaptation
Observed in the Participatory Methods catalog (participatorymethods.com, 2024-2025).
Retains the core visual mapping mechanic, relational line drawing, and grouping structure from Participatory Methods. UWT established a 45-minute delivery schedule across 5 steps, defined explicit arithmetic rules for group formation (3 to 5 members), added hybrid facilitator presence guidance across physical and online tables, defined explicit rules for labeled connection lines, standardized the sample diagram across all sections to four nodes, and clarified the option to provide written reflections during the gallery debrief.
See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.