Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: d68a1c068bd67e907113c182d55a43cceb89d664742b9f2534aca3abde9bab02

# Collaborative Mind Map

Participants work together on a shared canvas to map a central topic, adding primary categories and branching out secondary details and cross-links. The group examines the full map to spot patterns, clusters, and missing information.

**Time:** 45 minutes. 45 minutes matches the standard baseline from source evidence, scalable up to 90 minutes for deeper analysis.
**People:** 6 to 20. Whole group at one large canvas, or subgroups of 3 to 5 around separate canvases that merge into one map.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Build a shared visual map of a complex topic to identify relationships, themes, and information gaps.
**Use it when:** Use during project kickoff, problem exploration, or research synthesis when a group needs to collect and structure broad knowledge together.
**Skip it when:** Skip when the goal is to choose a single decision or when the team needs linear step-by-step task scheduling rather than conceptual exploration.

## Materials and tools

- 1 large roll of butcher paper (at least 6 feet long) or 1 large whiteboard
- 1 pad of 3x3 inch sticky notes per person
- 4 broad-tip whiteboard markers or colored felt pens per subgroup
- Low-tack painter tape for mounting paper
- Digital whiteboard tool (optional for remote/hybrid)

## Before participants arrive

1. Define the central topic title in advance.
2. Mount butcher paper across a wide wall at standing height, or wipe the whiteboard clean.
3. Write the central topic enclosed in an oval in the center of the canvas.

## Say this to open

Today we are creating a collaborative mind map to explore our central topic: [insert topic name]. We will start from the center, branch into main themes, and then add specific details, examples, and cross-connections. You can contribute by writing sticky notes or drawing directly on the board. Let us build a common picture of everything connected to this topic.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce topic and framework (5 minutes)

Speak the opening script. Point to the central node on the canvas. Explain the mapping convention: primary lines represent broad categories, secondary branches hold concrete details, and dotted lines connect ideas across branches. Give one neutral example: if the center is 'Office Onboarding', a primary branch could be 'Hardware Setup', and a secondary node under it could be 'Laptop Provisioning'.

### 2. Identify primary themes (10 minutes)

Ask participants to establish 4 to 6 main subtopics that radiate directly from the center. Draw thick lines connecting each accepted main theme to the center node. If working with 12 or more people on a single canvas, divide the group into pairs to draft primary subtopics on sticky notes first, then place them around the center. If using separate subgroup canvases, have each subgroup draft and mount their 4 to 6 primary subtopics on their own sheet.

### 3. Expand branches and connections (15 minutes)

Invite participants to approach the canvas and add secondary nodes, concrete examples, questions, or facts along the branching lines. Participants may write directly on the paper or place sticky notes. Prompt them to draw dashed lines between nodes on different branches that relate to each other. Keep physical traffic flowing so everyone can reach the canvas.

### 4. Analyze patterns and debrief (10 minutes)

Gather everyone back a few steps to see the entire canvas. Guide a focused debrief on visible patterns. Ask participants to identify dense zones, sparse zones, unexpected links, and obvious blind spots. Take 3 to 4 spoken responses across the group: 1. Which branch shows the strongest shared knowledge? 2. Where are the clear gaps or missing information? 3. What unexpected connection between branches stands out?

### 5. Document and agree on next steps (5 minutes)

Take a clear, high-resolution photo of the physical canvas. Invite one or two volunteers to transcribe the node text into a digital document or team wiki. Note any urgent gaps identified during the debrief as follow-up action items.


## Debrief questions

- Which branch shows the most agreement and shared knowledge across our group?
- Where on the map do we notice significant gaps, questions, or missing information?
- What unexpected connection between two different branches emerged today?

**Finished output:** A visual concept map showing primary and secondary branches connected to a central topic, captured in a photo or digital board export.

## Remote

Set up a digital board with the central topic node in the middle. Run step 1 by screen-sharing. In step 2, guide participants to establish 4 to 6 main subtopics using thick connector lines and distinct colors. In step 3, allow all participants to add color-coded sticky notes and secondary lines simultaneously. In step 4, call on participants using raised hands to answer the debrief questions while viewing the board. Export the canvas as an image or PDF immediately after closing.

## Hybrid

Use a single shared digital board as the master canvas, projected on the room wall. Remote participants add sticky notes and lines directly on their devices. In-person participants either post directly into the digital board via personal devices or write physical sticky notes that a designated room scribe transfers to the digital board in real time.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants can speak ideas aloud for a partner or facilitator to scribe if writing or standing at the wall is inconvenient.
- Participants may observe silently and add thoughts on sticky notes without speaking to the whole room.
- Ensure markers and sticky notes have high visual contrast against the canvas background.

## If the session gets stuck

**A few dominant participants crowd the canvas and monopolize the branches.**

Pause whole-group writing. Give everyone 3 minutes to write two ideas individually on sticky notes at their seats, then have people take turns posting one note each.

**The map becomes a tangle of unreadable, overlapping lines.**

Pause the mapping. Group nearby loose notes into neat clusters, redraw clean primary connector lines, and use color coding to separate major branches.


## Terms used here

- Mind Map: A visual diagram that organizes information around a single central concept using branching lines and nodes.
- Node: A point or bubble on the map that contains a specific word, concept, or piece of information.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Participatory Methods (participatorymethods.com), which catalogs Collaborative Mind Map as a visual participatory method.

Retained the core mechanic from Participatory Methods: central node, primary radiating branches, secondary expansion, collective visual analysis, and documentation. UWT integrated debrief questions directly into the Step 4 analysis block to ensure strict adherence to the 45-minute total, clarified large-group scaling for single versus subgroup canvases, and established a single-master-canvas protocol for hybrid sessions.

[Participatory Methods](https://participatorymethods.com/activities/collaborative-mind-map/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/collaborative-mind-map/