Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or your own local model: paste this prompt and your AI will co-facilitate this exercise with you.

Help me prepare and run the exercise below. First ask for my participant count, time, setting, access needs and intended result. Check these against the stated limits. Use the supplied rules and materials. Explain any proposed changes before using them, and label them as adaptations. Do not invent source claims or require personal disclosure. Give me one step at a time when I say start. I manage the people, physical activity and clock; do not claim to observe the room. Ask me what happened before choosing a next step.

Reference revision: 7bf5cf5366b6bb98f6efde44cd03742a595e34440977e73fd5bb9d9a3a6f0a22

# Asynchronous Reciprocity

Pairs or triads discuss moving away from direct tit-for-tat exchanges. Each person offers one tangible act of support and agrees to let the other person decide how and when to return support.

**Time:** 10 minutes. Source indicates under 5 minutes; UWT expands to 10 minutes to allow clear partner turns and debrief.
**People:** 4 to 24. Pairs or triads

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Exchange concrete offers of support without demanding immediate or matched repayment.
**Use it when:** Use during team formation, project kickoffs, or community sessions when colleagues need to build cooperative working habits across different roles.
**Skip it when:** Skip during legal contracting, formal performance disputes, or resource bargaining where precise, audited equivalence is required.

## Materials and tools

- One index card or sticky note per participant
- One pen or pencil per participant
- Countdown timer visible to the room

## Before participants arrive

1. Arrange seating in pairs or triads.
2. Distribute one note card and pen to each participant.
3. Write the prompt on a display: 'One way I can help you' and 'When/how to reciprocate (left open)'.

## Say this to open

Direct reciprocity looks like trade: I give you one hour of help today, so you owe me one hour tomorrow. Asynchronous reciprocity drops strict scorekeeping. You offer support now, and you leave it to your partner to decide when, if, and how they offer support back. Turn to your partner or triad to share one concrete offer of help you can deliver before our agreed deadline.

## How to run it

### 1. Frame the concept (2 minutes)

Explain the difference between transactional tit-for-tat trading and asynchronous reciprocity. Share one neutral example: 'I can proofread your slides before Friday, and you choose how or when you want to assist me later on.' Give participants 30 seconds of quiet reflection to choose an offer.

### 2. Partner share and offers (4 minutes)

In pairs or triads, each person takes up to one minute to name one concrete support action they can provide for another group member by a stated date. Partners listen without negotiating an immediate quid pro quo trade.

### 3. Record commitments (2 minutes)

Each person writes their concrete offer on their index card, along with the recipient's name and delivery date. Participants keep their own cards or hand them to the recipient as a reminder ticket.

### 4. Whole-room debrief (2 minutes)

Regather the room. Ask two quick reflection questions. Take contributions from two or three volunteers to fit the allotted time.


## Debrief questions

- What felt different about offering help without agreeing on an immediate payback?
- What makes it easy or hard to accept support when the return terms are unspecified?

**Finished output:** Written commitment cards recording specific offers of support with open-ended reciprocity.

## Remote

Form breakout rooms of two or three people for four minutes. Direct participants to post their offer in the video chat or on an open shared document instead of writing an index card.

## Hybrid

Pair in-person participants with other in-person attendees. Pair remote participants together in dedicated video breakout rooms. Have both streams record their offers into a single shared digital document.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may offer non-work social support, professional feedback, or administrative aid.
- Anyone may choose to observe their group without making or accepting a commitment.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants try to negotiate an immediate, identical exchange during their turn.**

Remind groups that the recipient must not promise a matched task right now. The return action and timing remain their choice.

**An odd number of participants leaves someone without a pair.**

Form one or two triads. Each person in a triad offers help to one other person in that small group.


## Terms used here

- Asynchronous reciprocity: Giving support to someone without expecting immediate, identical, or matched repayment on a fixed schedule.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Relationship Makers Handbook, page 38.

Retained the core mechanic from the Relationship Makers Handbook: discussing non-equivalent reciprocity and making personal offers of support. UWT expanded the timeline from under 5 minutes to 10 minutes, added tangible index card capture, structured pair timing, and provided debrief questions.

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/asynchronous-reciprocity/