United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

Scrum Values Retrospective

Team members post concrete examples of upholding or missing the five Scrum values during a past sprint. The team clusters topics, votes on key themes, and commits to strengthening one specific value in the next cycle.

50 minutes | 4 to 24 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Evaluate recent team working habits against the five Scrum values to produce a concrete behavioral commitment for the upcoming work cycle.

Use it when: Use at the end of a sprint or iteration when team dynamics feel off track, after onboarding new teammates to Agile practices, or when setting behavioral baselines.

Skip it when: Skip when the team has urgent operational breakdowns requiring immediate technical root-cause analysis or post-mortem incident response.

Group arrangement: Individual silent reflection, assigned subgroups or whole room for column sorting, and whole-group discussion

Timing: UWT facilitation plan providing 50 minutes for reflection, clustering, prioritized discussion, and commitment selection.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Draw 5 vertical columns on the board labeled: Commitment, Courage, Focus, Openness, and Respect.
  2. Place sticky notes, markers, voting dots, and printed prompt sheets at each seat or work area.

Say this to open

Welcome. In this retrospective we are stepping back from daily tasks to inspect how we work together through the lens of the five Scrum values: Commitment, Courage, Focus, Openness, and Respect. For each value, write specific examples of where our team lived up to it and where we fell short over the past cycle. Focus on observable team behaviors and shared practices, not personal attacks.

How to run it

  1. Introduce values and write silent reflections 10 minutes

    Explain the five columns. Give everyone 8 minutes of silent writing. Each person writes observations on separate sticky notes: positive examples of embodying a value or clear gaps where the team struggled. A neutral example: under Focus, 'Our daily goals were clear until unexpected urgent requests pulled two engineers away midweek.' Participants write as many notes as they wish. Anyone may choose to keep notes private or pass on posting them, per our access guidelines.

  2. Post and sort in assigned teams or whole room 10 minutes

    Participants post notes under matching headers. For 10 to 24 people, assign 2 to 5 people per column. For 4 to 9 people, review columns together as a room or assign one person per column. Teams take 6 minutes to merge duplicates and label theme clusters. With the remaining time, one spokesperson per column gives a strictly timed 30-second summary naming their column clusters.

  3. Vote and prioritize discussion 4 minutes

    Distribute 3 voting dots to each participant. Give the group 3 minutes to vote silently on the clusters or topics they consider most important to address in the next sprint. The facilitator tallies the votes and announces the top two clusters receiving the most dots for whole-group discussion.

  4. Analyze challenges and propose actions 18 minutes

    Open the floor to address the two prioritized clusters, spending 9 minutes on each. Facilitate open dialogue across the room, limiting individual comments to 1 minute to hear diverse perspectives. Aim for four to six distinct comments per cluster rather than hearing from every participant. Prompt the team to identify systemic friction and draft practical process tweaks. Write proposed actions visibly beside the columns on the board.

  5. Commit to one focus value and debrief 8 minutes

    Ask the group to review proposed improvements and select one Scrum value to consciously emphasize throughout the upcoming sprint. Record this chosen value and the concrete team agreement on the board. Close by presenting debrief question 3 to confirm how the team will track this change, inviting two or three spontaneous responses. Select questions 1 or 2 if extra reflection time remains.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A board of categorized behavioral observations and one agreed team commitment linked to a specific Scrum value for the upcoming sprint.

Remote

Set up an online whiteboard with five labeled columns corresponding to the values. Keep card creation anonymous during the 8-minute writing phase. Assign participants to breakout rooms or designated columns to organize clusters. Use the platform digital voting tool for prioritizing clusters. Run the discussion over voice with video optional, typing action items directly into the shared board.

Hybrid

All participants, whether in person or remote, submit notes directly to the shared digital whiteboard via laptops or mobile devices. Display the board on the in-room projector. The facilitator alternates explicitly between remote and in-room participants during discussion and voting.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Observations turn into personal accusations against specific team members.
Intervene immediately and remind the group to focus on work processes, environment, and team agreements rather than individuals.
One value receives all the notes while other columns stay completely empty.
Acknowledge the heavy focus on that topic, then invite the room to reflect on the quieter values for two minutes to check if anything was overlooked.

Terms used here

Scrum Values Retrospective Prompts

Use these guiding questions to reflect on the recent cycle: 1. Commitment: What commitments did we uphold well? Where did our commitments feel out of reach or poorly protected? 2. Courage: When did we tackle difficult problems or make tough calls? Where did we hesitate to raise issues or push back? 3. Focus: What helped us stay centered on our sprint goals? What external distractions or context-switching pulled us off track? 4. Openness: In what areas were we fully transparent about progress, risks, and obstacles? Was anything left unsaid or bottled up? 5. Respect: How did we demonstrate trust in each other's competence and time? What behaviors eroded mutual respect?

Sources and adaptation

Observed in retrospective template collections from Parabol and EasyRetro, drawing directly upon the five core Scrum values originally established in the Scrum Guide.

Retained the five Scrum values structure, column-based reflection, and the closing mechanic of selecting one value to strengthen, as documented in EasyRetro and Parabol templates. UWT adjusted time allocations to 50 minutes total (10m writing, 10m sorting with strict 30-second summary limits, 4m voting, 18m analysis across 2 clusters, 8m commitment and debrief), simplified physical setup by having questions on individual prompt sheets rather than hand-copied onto the board, and aligned the materials list directly with participant handouts.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.