United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

WhoDo

Teams define a central goal, list the specific people needed to achieve it, and define the exact observable actions those people must take.

30 minutes | 4 to 24 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Map specific actors to concrete, measurable actions required to achieve a stated goal.

Use it when: Use during project kickoffs, change initiatives, or campaign planning when goals need concrete, behavioral steps.

Skip it when: Skip when the team has already assigned work breakdowns or when the session focus is exploring open-ended root causes.

Group arrangement: Subgroups of 3 to 5 people. If numbers leave a remainder, form groups of 4 or add an extra person to make groups of 5 or 6.

Timing: Source specifies 20 to 45 minutes; UWT standardizes on 30 minutes for multi-table breakout work.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Post one flip chart sheet per subgroup on the wall or place it flat on each work table.
  2. Draw a vertical line down the center of each sheet, labeling the left column WHO and the right column DO.
  3. Write the overarching project goal visibly at the top of each sheet.

Say this to open

Goals stall when we describe what people should think rather than what they must do. Today we will build a WhoDo map. We will identify the specific people involved in our goal and define the exact, observable actions we need each of them to take.

How to run it

  1. Clarify the target goal 4 minutes

    State the shared goal clearly and write it at the top of the room's central board. Ensure each subgroup has the same goal written on their table sheet. Invite brief questions to confirm everyone understands the scope of the target before writing names.

  2. Brainstorm the Who 8 minutes

    Subgroups write specific individuals, roles, or groups on sticky notes and place them in the left WHO column. Prompt for decision-makers, resource holders, and blockers. Aim for 4 to 8 actors. If groups have fewer than 4, prompt them to look for indirect blockers. If they have more than 8, consolidate duplicates to keep focus.

  3. Specify concrete Do actions 10 minutes

    For each WHO, subgroups write the required action in the right DO column directly across from the actor. Actions must be observable behaviors, not internal states. For example, instead of 'understand the plan', write 'sign off on the budget' or 'approve the schedule'. If an action is too vague, ask what evidence proves it happened.

  4. Prioritize and debrief 8 minutes

    Each subgroup identifies their top two most critical WHO-DO pairs by marking them with a star. One speaker from each subgroup reads their single most critical pair aloud. Facilitate a brief discussion comparing priority actions across groups.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A two-column WHO and DO matrix per subgroup with prioritized observable actions for each identified actor.

Remote

Set up a shared digital whiteboard with pre-formatted two-column frames for each breakout room. Place breakout participants into rooms of 3 to 5. Have them add digital sticky notes to the WHO and DO columns, then use digital star stamps for prioritization before returning to the main room.

Hybrid

Pair in-person tables with an assigned tablet or laptop, or have remote participants join as an independent breakout room using the shared digital whiteboard. Ensure an in-person scribe mirrors physical sticky notes onto the shared digital board so remote and in-person tables can review each other's outputs during the debrief.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Participants write vague desires like 'support the project' or 'get buy-in' in the DO column.
Ask the group: 'What physical action would show they bought in? Would they sign an agreement, release budget, or send an announcement email?' Replace the vague phrase with that specific act.
Groups list broad demographic categories like 'the community' or 'management' as their WHO.
Direct the group to narrow the label to an individual role, department head, or specific working committee capable of taking a single decision.

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed in Gamestorming records, where the activity is attributed to Dave Gray.

Retained the core two-column WHO and DO matrix and the behavioral action constraint from Gamestorming. Structured the session into a 30-minute run sheet with standardized group sizes, subgroup steps, explicit prioritization, and remote/hybrid logistics.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.