United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

Spectrum Mapping

Participants write their viewpoints or options on sticky notes and arrange them into a horizontal continuum across a wall or board. The group visualizes clusters, gaps, and extreme positions without judging individual contributors.

35 minutes | 5 to 15 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Display the full horizontal range of viewpoints or preferences on a specific topic so the group can see where opinions cluster and where outliers sit.

Use it when: Use when a team faces a complex decision or contentious policy and needs to see the spread of actual opinions before negotiating a direction.

Skip it when: Skip when the group has already committed to a strict binary decision or when an immediate quantitative vote is required.

Group arrangement: Whole group working in parallel at a shared wall or board

Timing: Gamestorming lists 30 to 60 minutes for 5 to 15 people; 35 minutes provides a focused single-topic run.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Select 1 or 2 clear topics to explore (for example, 'Release frequency for product updates').
  2. Write each topic on a large sticky note and post it centrally on the wall.
  3. Clear a wide horizontal corridor along the wall to allow participants to post and sort notes freely.

Say this to open

We are going to map our range of viewpoints on this topic across a continuous spectrum. The goal is to see our entire landscape of thought, from conventional options to extreme outliers, without evaluating anyone. Please take sticky notes and write down your honest preferences, proposed options, or viewpoints. Put one idea per note, writing large and clear.

How to run it

  1. Introduce topic and write perspectives 6 minutes

    State the central topic written on the board. Direct participants to write their honest viewpoints, proposed actions, or preferences on sticky notes using their markers. They may write multiple notes. Participants work silently.

  2. Post notes along the baseline 5 minutes

    Invite everyone to walk up and post their notes in a horizontal band extending left and right from the center topic. Clarify that exact placement does not matter yet; getting all cards on the wall is the only objective in this step.

  3. Collaborative sorting into a continuum 14 minutes

    Instruct the whole group to step up and physically rearrange the notes into a coherent horizontal gradient. Notes expressing similar preferences cluster together. Distinct or extreme ideas move outward toward opposite poles. Work without formal turn-taking until the group reaches consensus on the relative positions of the notes.

  4. Observe patterns and debrief 10 minutes

    Step back and view the finished continuum. Ask the group if any obvious perspective or alternative was left out. If so, write it on a note and place it. Call on 3 to 4 participants to share observations on where the group concentrates and where the boundaries sit.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A visible horizontal continuum of sticky notes displaying the group's range of attitudes and options on the chosen topic.

Remote

Set up an online whiteboard with a wide horizontal axis and the topic placed in the middle. Participants type ideas on digital sticky notes in private or directly on the board. The group then drags notes along the axis together using voice chat to negotiate relative placement.

Hybrid

In-person participants post to a physical wall while a designated digital scribe mirrors them onto an online canvas, or have all participants use individual laptops to place virtual sticky notes on a shared digital board projected in the room.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Participants place notes haphazardly without agreeing on what the horizontal ends represent.
Pause the group, find the two most extreme opposing notes already posted, place them at opposite ends, and label the poles clearly to guide further sorting.
People hesitate to post controversial or minority viewpoints for fear of judgment.
Remind everyone that notes are anonymous and that extreme outliers are essential for mapping the full boundary of options.

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed in Gamestorming (where original author is noted as unknown) and indexed in SessionLab.

Retained the core Gamestorming mechanics: posting topic notes centrally, generating independent viewpoint notes, placing them horizontally, sorting into a continuum, and examining clusters and outliers. UWT added explicit step timing for a 35-minute run, exact participant script, access options, neutral example, and structured debrief questions.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.