United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

Argue It Out

Participants write their stance on an index card, deliver short uninterrupted mini-speeches, and enter a moderated discussion to test competing viewpoints. A volunteer scribe charts all arguments and trade-offs on a shared board.

35 minutes | 4 to 12 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Bring conflicting perspectives and counterarguments into view before making a decision.

Use it when: Use during a decision meeting when a group faces a contentious choice, risks groupthink, or needs to examine opposing sides thoroughly.

Skip it when: Skip when a decision has already been finalized, when interpersonal tension makes direct debate unsafe, or when the goal is simple informational broadcast.

Group arrangement: Whole-room session with individual writing, timed individual mini-speeches, and an open moderated exchange.

Timing: Source suggests 30 to 60 minutes; this run sheet provides a 35-minute protocol that accommodates up to 12 one-minute speeches.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Write the central question or proposed course of action across the top of the board.
  2. Draw two vertical columns on the board labeled Arguments For and Arguments Against.
  3. Distribute one index card and one pen to each participant.
  4. Ask for a volunteer to act as scribe for the session, noting that taking this role allows someone to participate through writing rather than speaking. If nobody volunteers, scribe from the facilitator role.

Say this to open

Today we are examining all sides of our central question. Before we argue, everyone gets up to one minute to state their viewpoint without interruption. Our goal is not to win right now, but to occupy different positions and surface the strongest points on all sides. Take your index card and write down your core stance and your single strongest supporting reason.

How to run it

  1. Write initial positions 4 minutes

    Read the focal question aloud. Invite each participant to write their stance and main supporting point on their card. Those who plan to pass during the speaking rounds may note questions or tensions they want to track on the board. Stop writing when the four-minute timer sounds.

  2. Deliver uninterrupted mini-speeches 13 minutes

    Go around the circle. Give each participant up to one minute to state their position. No interruptions, cross-talk, or rebuttals are allowed during this phase. Anyone may pass simply by saying pass. The scribe records key points in the matching column on the board as each person speaks.

  3. Moderated argument exchange 13 minutes

    Open the floor for moderated debate. Invite participants to challenge points on the board, offer counterarguments, or advocate for an opposing view to test its strength. Call on speakers one at a time. The scribe adds new points, rebuttals, and trade-offs to the board. End when the timer reaches zero.

  4. Review points and debrief 5 minutes

    Direct attention to the completed board. Pose the debrief questions to the full room. Take brief responses from volunteers across the remaining minutes to close out the session.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A two-column chart displaying arguments, counterarguments, and identified trade-offs for the focal question.

Remote

Run on a video call with a shared digital whiteboard or document visible on screen. During silent writing, participants take notes privately. The facilitator calls on each participant in turn for their one-minute mini-speech. During open debate, participants raise their digital hand to be called on. A designated participant or co-host logs points directly into the board.

Hybrid

Seat in-person participants facing both the room board and the remote camera. Remote participants write notes locally. Alternate between in-person and remote participants during mini-speeches. Use a shared digital whiteboard projected in the room so all participants see the exact same live notes. Test audio so remote voices carry clearly into the room.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

One or two participants dominate the moderated argument phase.
Enforce hand-raising and cap individual speaking turns at ninety seconds, specifically inviting comments from those who have not yet spoken.
Participants interrupt or debate each other during the mini-speech round.
Intervene immediately. Remind the group that speeches are strictly uninterrupted, and ask responders to write counterpoints on their cards for the open debate.

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed in Relationship Makers Handbook (pages 276-277), where it is titled Obama Argue it Out and references meeting practices attributed to Barack Obama.

Retained the mechanic from Relationship Makers Handbook: participants write initial thoughts, give uninterrupted mini-speeches, and engage in a moderated argument recorded by a scribe. UWT structured the timing to 35 minutes to allow up to 12 full one-minute turns, resolved role selection for the scribe, added facilitator scripts, and detailed remote and hybrid procedures.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.