United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

Three-Step Workshop Close

Participants review opening objectives, complete an individual thinking-shift prompt, and provide structured session feedback using What Went Well and Even Better If.

30 minutes | 4 to 24 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Verify session outcomes against original goals, capture individual cognitive shifts, and collect constructive feedback for session improvement.

Use it when: At the conclusion of a training session, working session, or team alignment workshop when participants need to consolidate takeaways and evaluate delivery.

Skip it when: When the meeting is brief, lacks pre-stated objectives, or requires immediate operational troubleshooting rather than reflective evaluation.

Group arrangement: Solo reflection followed by pairs and structured whole-room collection.

Timing: Matches the 30-minute duration stated in the WorkshopBank source framework.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Post the session objectives established at the beginning where all participants can read them.
  2. Prepare two flip chart sheets or board sections labeled 'What Went Well (WWW)' and 'Even Better If (EBI)'.
  3. Distribute writing supplies and paper to each participant seat.

Say this to open

We have reached the end of our working agenda. Before we leave, we will spend thirty minutes reviewing our original targets, noting what shifted in your thinking, and gathering your feedback so we can refine future sessions. Please take your pen and look at our opening objectives on the board.

How to run it

  1. Review Opening Objectives 6 minutes

    Walk through each objective recorded at the start of the workshop. For each goal, ask participants to confirm with a thumbs-up, sideways, or down whether they consider it addressed. Note any open threads or unresolved items directly on the chart. Limit discussion to confirming evidence of completion, taking up to two comments per objective.

  2. Draft Thinking Shift 5 minutes

    Ask each participant to write individually on scrap paper or a card, completing this sentence: 'I used to think..., but now I think...'. Give an explicit example: 'I used to think user interviews had to take an hour, but now I think twenty minutes is enough to spot usability blockers.' Writing is silent and personal.

  3. Share Shifts in Pairs and Room 7 minutes

    Direct participants to pair with a neighbor. Give two minutes per person to share their sentence if they wish. Reassemble the group and invite four to five volunteers to read their completed shift to the whole room. Participants may pass or simply state 'Passed'.

  4. Write Structured Feedback 6 minutes

    Hand out two sticky notes to each person. Instruct them to write one specific item under 'What Went Well' on note one, and one actionable suggestion under 'Even Better If' on note two. Emphasize that feedback can cover pacing, exercises, clarity, or materials. Participants who prefer not to submit notes may keep them blank.

  5. Collect Notes and Close 6 minutes

    Invite participants to walk up and place their notes on the corresponding WWW and EBI flip charts. Read aloud two neutral examples from each board to acknowledge the input without debating or defending. Thank the group and conclude the workshop.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A checked list of original workshop objectives, individual completed perspective-shift statements, and sticky notes organized into 'What Went Well' and 'Even Better If' columns.

Remote

Display original objectives on a shared screen and check off each with typed chat reactions (+/-). Use an online whiteboard or document where participants type their 'I used to think..., but now I think...' reflections silently. Run pair shares in breakout rooms for four minutes. Have participants post digital sticky notes onto a two-column WWW/EBI board, reading four total notes aloud before concluding.

Hybrid

Display the objectives on both a digital canvas and the physical room monitor. In-person participants write physical sticky notes and post them on room boards; remote participants add notes to the digital canvas. A designated co-facilitator reads two digital notes aloud while the room facilitator reads two physical notes aloud.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Participants use the objective review to reopen debates or start new work.
Cut off open debate immediately. Say: 'We are noting whether the objective was addressed today, not redoing the work. Let us log this topic on the parking lot for follow-up.'
Feedback notes offer vague compliments like 'great job' instead of actionable input.
Prompt specifically for mechanics: 'Name one exercise that worked well, or one instruction that needed more time or clearer examples.'

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed on WorkshopBank under the title 'How To Finish Any Workshop'. The platform notes creation by former KPMG and McKinsey consultants, though individual original authorship is not established.

The core three-part structure (Objectives check, 'I used to think..., but now I think...', and 'What Went Well? Even Better If...') is directly preserved from the WorkshopBank source. UWT established concrete group sizes, exact step timings summing to 30 minutes, structured pair sharing, a neutral example for the cognitive shift prompt, and explicit accessibility choices.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.