United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet
Dot Voting
Participants review posted options, receive an equal allocation of sticky dots, and place them on their preferred choices. The group tallies the dots to produce a clear, visible shortlist of top priorities.
20 minutes | 4 to 24 people
Choose this exercise
Purpose: Rank and narrow a list of options into a prioritized shortlist using equal individual allocations.
Use it when: Use when narrowing brainstormed ideas, selecting unconference topics, or prioritizing retrospective action items.
Skip it when: Skip when options have complex interdependencies, require detailed cost-benefit trade-offs, or demand formal consensus rather than a straw poll.
Group arrangement: Whole group reviewing items individually, voting in parallel, and debriefing together.
Timing: Adjusted to 20 minutes for a focused group of up to 24; source lists 15 to 30 minutes.
Materials and tools
- Wall charts or whiteboard displaying written options
- Sheet of 3 to 5 sticky dot stickers per participant (or markers for drawing dots)
- Timer
- Digital whiteboard tool with circular token graphics (for remote or hybrid sessions)
- Dedicated co-facilitator (for hybrid sessions)
Before participants arrive
- Write all brainstormed options clearly on posters or index cards posted across a flat wall surface.
- Ensure spacing between items so dots can cluster legibly around individual choices.
- Prepare sheets of 3 to 5 sticky dots per person.
Say this to open
We have our options posted on the wall. Each person gets four sticky dots. For example, if our criterion is highest immediate customer impact, pick the items that deliver that value best. You will review choices silently, decide where to allocate dots, and place them without lobbying others.
How to run it
Frame criteria and distribute dots 3 minutes
State the evaluation criteria explicitly, such as highest immediate value with lowest effort. Hand out dot sheets to every participant. Clarify the distribution rule: state whether participants can place multiple dots on one item or only one dot per item. Read the opening script.
Walk the gallery silently 4 minutes
Ask participants to circulate around the displayed options in complete silence. Everyone reads all posted items before placing any dots. Silence prevents early votes from swaying the room.
Place votes 5 minutes
Invite participants to step up to the display and stick their dots next to their chosen options. Keep the room quiet during voting so people make independent assessments. Participants return to their seats once finished.
Tally and sort results 4 minutes
Count the dots on each item aloud. Write the total count directly on each card or sheet. Move the highest-scoring items into a visible shortlist cluster.
Review patterns and confirm next steps 4 minutes
Point out the top cluster of options. Invite up to three participants to share observations on patterns or unexpected clusters. Confirm the immediate action owner for the top items.
Debrief questions
- What patterns or surprises stand out in how the dots clustered?
- Did any critical option receive fewer votes than expected, and why might that be?
- Looking at the top two or three items, what is our immediate next action?
Finished output: A visibly tallied list of options ordered by group preference, with the top items selected for implementation or next-stage planning.
Remote
Display the options on a shared digital whiteboard. Give each participant an identical row of colored circular tokens. Run a 4-minute silent reading round. Participants drag their tokens onto chosen cards simultaneously during a 5-minute voting timer. The facilitator tallies scores on screen.
Hybrid
Run the primary voting canvas on a shared digital whiteboard. Remote participants place digital dot tokens directly on the board. In-person participants review the projected board and have a dedicated co-facilitator place digital dots on their behalf, or in-person participants place physical dots on cards which the co-facilitator immediately copies onto the shared digital board before the tally begins.
Access and participation choices
- Provide a spoken read-through of all posted options for participants with visual impairments.
- Allow participants with mobility constraints to mark choices on a handheld list or point for a proxy to place dots.
- Participants may decline to spend all dots or choose to abstain without explanation.
If the session gets stuck
- Participants bunch up around the first sheet and rush to follow where others place dots.
- Enforce silent reading during the gallery walk before allowing anyone to stick a dot, and invite half the room to start from opposite ends of the display.
- Votes tie across several competing options.
- Run a quick secondary run-off vote giving each participant exactly one dot to allocate between only the tied items.
Terms used here
- Dotmocracy: A facilitation technique where participants use adhesive dots to indicate preference among multiple listed options.
- Run-off vote: A second, narrower vote used to break a tie between top contenders.
Sources and adaptation
Observed in WorkshopBank under the title 'Dot Voting/Dotmocracy'. Dot voting is a widely used facilitation mechanic with diverse antecedents.
Retained the core five-phase dot voting structure from WorkshopBank evidence (frame, gallery walk, vote, read results, closing). Added exact step timing for a 20-minute run sheet, explicit dot distribution order, hybrid roles, and digital material requirements.
See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.
Current version: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/dot-voting-dotmocracy-workshop-workshopbank/
Revision: 887b7a04f1c7