United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

Challenge Axis

Participants write down current work challenges and plot them onto a four-part grid based on predictability and ease of resolution. The group reviews the resulting map to identify common themes and plan follow-up working pairs.

15 minutes | 4 to 24 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Map personal or project challenges into simple, complicated, complex, or chaotic categories to decide how to tackle them.

Use it when: Use at the start of a project, training session, or retrospective to surface real obstacles and decide which need expert analysis versus quick action.

Skip it when: Skip when the group has a single predetermined operational problem that already has a mandatory standard procedure.

Group arrangement: Individual reflection followed by whole-room plotting and optional pairs

Timing: 15 minutes suggested by UWT based on the 5-to-15 minute band in the source record.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Draw a large 2x2 grid on the wall or whiteboard.
  2. Label the four quadrants: Simple (easy to resolve, predictable), Complicated (harder, needs expertise or practice, predictable), Complex (many paths, unpredictable results), and Chaotic (turbulent, no clear path forward).
  3. Place sticky notes and markers at each seat or on a central table.

Say this to open

Take two minutes to write down one or two specific challenges you face related to our topic today. Write one challenge per sticky note using large, readable letters.

How to run it

  1. Draft challenges 3 minutes

    Say the opening script. Direct participants to write 1 or 2 specific obstacles on separate sticky notes. Example: 'Keeping eye contact while presenting' or 'Getting timely feedback from technical reviewers'. People may choose to keep their notes private or observe without posting.

  2. Define the quadrants 3 minutes

    Walk through the four sections of the grid. Simple means easy to resolve with predictable outcomes. Complicated requires expertise, analysis, or practice, but outcomes remain predictable. Complex has many possible approaches with unpredictable outcomes. Chaotic means the situation is too turbulent to see a clear next step.

  3. Plot challenges 4 minutes

    Invite participants to walk up to the board and place their sticky notes in the quadrant that best matches their situation. For larger groups up to 24, have participants place notes in two quick waves to avoid crowding at the board.

  4. Review patterns and debrief 5 minutes

    Look at the distribution of notes across the four areas. Invite 3 or 4 volunteers to explain why they placed their item where they did. Highlight any clusters, and suggest participants with notes in the same quadrant connect during future exercises.

Debrief questions

Finished output: A visible 2x2 grid mapping participant challenges across simple, complicated, complex, and chaotic quadrants.

Remote

Set up an online whiteboard (such as Miro, Mural, or Limnu) with the four quadrants pre-drawn. Participants write challenges on digital sticky notes during Step 1 and drag them into quadrants during Step 3. Call on participants via video chat to share during the debrief.

Hybrid

Maintain the primary board on a digital whiteboard that both room and remote participants can edit. In-room participants use personal laptops or submit physical sticky notes to an assigned in-room buddy who adds them to the shared board. Project the shared board in the room so all participants view the exact same layout.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Participants write broad, vague topics like 'communication' instead of concrete challenges.
Prompt them to name a specific moment or task, such as 'getting weekly status updates from the design team on Mondays'.
Participants get stuck debating the difference between complicated and complex.
Clarify that complicated problems have known good practices and predictable results, while complex problems require experimentation because the outcome cannot be predicted in advance.

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed in Knowmium tool database by Joshua Davies. Knowmium notes an attribution link to Liberating Structures (Agreement & Certainty Matrix).

Preserved the four quadrant categories (simple, complicated, complex, chaotic) and core mechanic from Knowmium's Challenge Axis. Added UWT step timing summing to 15 minutes, clear group size boundaries, practical room management steps, explicit debrief questions, and hybrid accommodation guidance.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.