United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet
15% Solutions
Participants identify immediate, tangible actions they can take within their existing discretion without asking for extra budget or permission. They test and refine their ideas in small peer groups to produce concrete personal commitments.
25 minutes | 4 to 24 people
Choose this exercise
Purpose: Surface immediately actionable personal steps within existing authority so individuals move from talking about system-level changes to taking direct action.
Use it when: At the conclusion of a planning session, retrospective, or workshop when participants feel overwhelmed by large problems and need individual, actionable starting points.
Skip it when: When a team genuinely lacks individual discretion because decisions strictly require executive approval, or before the problem has been explored enough to identify meaningful actions.
Group arrangement: Solo reflection followed by trios or quartets (groups of 2 to 4), concluding with individual commitments.
Timing: Based on the 20 to 30 minute standard run time reported in the source.
Materials and tools
- Index cards or sticky notes (2 to 3 per participant)
- Pens (1 per participant)
- Timer visible to the facilitator
- Flip chart or display screen showing the core prompt
Before participants arrive
- Write the core prompt visibly on a flip chart or presentation slide: 'Where do you have discretion and freedom to act? What can you do without more resources or authority?'
- Arrange seating into clusters of 3 to 4 chairs without obstructing tables.
- Place index cards and pens at each seat.
Say this to open
We often focus on what leadership or other teams should do, which can leave us waiting. A 15 percent solution is something you can do immediately, on your own, using only the resources and authority you already hold. Take an index card. In silence, write down two or three concrete actions you can start within the next 48 hours without needing permission or budget.
How to run it
Frame the boundary 3 minutes
Explain the concept of 15% Solutions. Give a clear example contrasting systemic wishes with personal discretion. Display the core prompt and verify that everyone understands they are writing individual actions rather than organizational recommendations.
Write personal actions silently 5 minutes
Participants spend five uninterrupted minutes writing at least two concrete actions on their cards. If someone writes a statement starting with 'We should,' remind them to reframe it as 'I will.'
Consult in small groups 12 minutes
Form groups of 3 (or pairs/quartets if numbers require). Allocate roughly 3 to 4 minutes per person. In each round, one person reads their list while the peers ask clarifying questions and offer advice to make the step smaller, simpler, and immediately testable. Call time to ensure each member receives consultation.
Commit and close 5 minutes
Invite each person to pick one specific action card and circle their primary commitment. Conduct a quick whip-around where up to 8 volunteers read their single sentence aloud to the room, or have everyone pair with a partner to state their 48-hour commitment.
Debrief questions
- What made it easy or difficult to separate your personal discretion from wider organizational fixes?
- How did peer consultation help make your first step smaller or more practical?
- What mechanism will you use to verify you completed this action within the next week?
Finished output: Each participant holds at least one index card stating an immediate, concrete action they can take within their own authority.
Remote
Display the prompt on a shared screen. Give 5 minutes for solo reflection while participants type their ideas into private notes or a shared canvas. Send participants into breakout rooms of 3 people for 12 minutes with broadcast time checks every 4 minutes. Reconvene in the main room and have participants type their single committed action into the text chat.
Hybrid
Keep remote attendees in their own virtual breakout groups of 2 to 4 while in-person participants work in local room clusters. Use a unified digital board (or chat stream) during the final five minutes so both remote and room-based participants post their selected commitments simultaneously.
Access and participation choices
- Writing on cards can be replaced by typing into personal devices or dictating quietly to a peer.
- Sharing in the whole-room round is optional; participants may simply show their card or keep their written commitment private without explanation.
If the session gets stuck
- Participants write broad systemic fixes like 'Improve cross-team communication' instead of individual steps.
- Ask the writer: 'What is one specific email you can send or one meeting agenda you can change tomorrow morning to start that?'
- One person dominates the small group consultation time.
- Enforce strict timed rounds from the front of the room. Announce transitions clearly: 'Time is up for person one; please shift attention to person two.'
Terms used here
- 15% Solution: An action within an individual's immediate authority and discretion that requires no extra budget, policy change, or outside permission.
Sources and adaptation
Observed in WorkshopBank. The source attributes the method to Henri Lipmanowicz and Keith McCandless as part of Liberating Structures, drawing on earlier work by Gareth Morgan and Asaf Zohar.
Retained the core mechanic, timing parameters, and framing documented in the source record. Standardized into a tight 25-minute run plan for 4 to 24 participants, added explicit hybrid handling, and clarified boundary rules against systemic recommendations.
See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.
Current version: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/15-solutions-workshopbank/
Revision: ff0d96e07b03