United We Transform | Facilitator run sheet

15% Solutions

Participants identify immediate, tangible actions they can take within their existing discretion without asking for extra budget or permission. They test and refine their ideas in small peer groups to produce concrete personal commitments.

25 minutes | 4 to 24 people

Choose this exercise

Purpose: Surface immediately actionable personal steps within existing authority so individuals move from talking about system-level changes to taking direct action.

Use it when: At the conclusion of a planning session, retrospective, or workshop when participants feel overwhelmed by large problems and need individual, actionable starting points.

Skip it when: When a team genuinely lacks individual discretion because decisions strictly require executive approval, or before the problem has been explored enough to identify meaningful actions.

Group arrangement: Solo reflection followed by trios or quartets (groups of 2 to 4), concluding with individual commitments.

Timing: Based on the 20 to 30 minute standard run time reported in the source.

Materials and tools

Before participants arrive

  1. Write the core prompt visibly on a flip chart or presentation slide: 'Where do you have discretion and freedom to act? What can you do without more resources or authority?'
  2. Arrange seating into clusters of 3 to 4 chairs without obstructing tables.
  3. Place index cards and pens at each seat.

Say this to open

We often focus on what leadership or other teams should do, which can leave us waiting. A 15 percent solution is something you can do immediately, on your own, using only the resources and authority you already hold. Take an index card. In silence, write down two or three concrete actions you can start within the next 48 hours without needing permission or budget.

How to run it

  1. Frame the boundary 3 minutes

    Explain the concept of 15% Solutions. Give a clear example contrasting systemic wishes with personal discretion. Display the core prompt and verify that everyone understands they are writing individual actions rather than organizational recommendations.

  2. Write personal actions silently 5 minutes

    Participants spend five uninterrupted minutes writing at least two concrete actions on their cards. If someone writes a statement starting with 'We should,' remind them to reframe it as 'I will.'

  3. Consult in small groups 12 minutes

    Form groups of 3 (or pairs/quartets if numbers require). Allocate roughly 3 to 4 minutes per person. In each round, one person reads their list while the peers ask clarifying questions and offer advice to make the step smaller, simpler, and immediately testable. Call time to ensure each member receives consultation.

  4. Commit and close 5 minutes

    Invite each person to pick one specific action card and circle their primary commitment. Conduct a quick whip-around where up to 8 volunteers read their single sentence aloud to the room, or have everyone pair with a partner to state their 48-hour commitment.

Debrief questions

Finished output: Each participant holds at least one index card stating an immediate, concrete action they can take within their own authority.

Remote

Display the prompt on a shared screen. Give 5 minutes for solo reflection while participants type their ideas into private notes or a shared canvas. Send participants into breakout rooms of 3 people for 12 minutes with broadcast time checks every 4 minutes. Reconvene in the main room and have participants type their single committed action into the text chat.

Hybrid

Keep remote attendees in their own virtual breakout groups of 2 to 4 while in-person participants work in local room clusters. Use a unified digital board (or chat stream) during the final five minutes so both remote and room-based participants post their selected commitments simultaneously.

Access and participation choices

If the session gets stuck

Participants write broad systemic fixes like 'Improve cross-team communication' instead of individual steps.
Ask the writer: 'What is one specific email you can send or one meeting agenda you can change tomorrow morning to start that?'
One person dominates the small group consultation time.
Enforce strict timed rounds from the front of the room. Announce transitions clearly: 'Time is up for person one; please shift attention to person two.'

Terms used here

Sources and adaptation

Observed in WorkshopBank. The source attributes the method to Henri Lipmanowicz and Keith McCandless as part of Liberating Structures, drawing on earlier work by Gareth Morgan and Asaf Zohar.

Retained the core mechanic, timing parameters, and framing documented in the source record. Standardized into a tight 25-minute run plan for 4 to 24 participants, added explicit hybrid handling, and clarified boundary rules against systemic recommendations.

See our editorial policy for AI use, sourcing and corrections.