# Scenario Slider

Subgroups design an implementation plan for a single core concept under extreme constraint settings, such as unlimited budget paired with an impossible deadline. Each team presents their model and the whole room analyzes which elements remain viable under real conditions.

**Time:** 45 minutes. UWT suggested operational duration; source does not state step durations.
**People:** 4 to 24. Parallel subgroups of 2 to 6 people (up to 4 subgroups total).

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Test an initiative against polarized resource constraints to identify non-negotiable requirements and hidden implementation options.
**Use it when:** Use after selecting a central project concept or strategy, when the team needs to explore delivery tactics without getting stuck in immediate budget debates.
**Skip it when:** Skip when the core concept is not yet chosen, or when the team lacks basic contextual knowledge about real-world project variables.

## Materials and tools

- 1 flipchart pad or large whiteboard per subgroup
- 4 chisel-tip markers per subgroup
- Scenario assignment cards or briefing sheets (1 per subgroup)
- Roll of masking tape
- 1 digital countdown timer

## Before participants arrive

1. Identify the single project idea or business initiative to be tested.
2. Select 2 or 3 project variables (for example: Budget, Staffing, Delivery Timeline).
3. Prepare 2 to 4 extreme scenario cards by pushing the variable sliders to opposite ends.
4. Set up breakout tables with flipchart paper and markers.

## Say this to open

We have chosen our direction, but implementation discussions often stall when we debate what is realistic. Today we are testing our concept across extreme conditions using Scenario Slider. Each table gets the exact same initiative, but under radically different constraints. Take your assigned conditions as absolute fact. Do not spend time arguing that three months is impossible. Instead, show us exactly how you would make it work under those terms, along with the tradeoffs your approach creates.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce concept and assign scenarios (5 minutes)

State the central initiative clearly. Present the variables chosen for the session. Divide the room into 2 to 4 subgroups (maximum 6 people per group). Hand each group one prepared scenario card with fixed extreme settings. Instruct groups to designate a recorder and a presenter.

### 2. Develop extreme implementation plans (20 minutes)

Groups work in parallel to build their implementation approach on their flipchart. Teams must accept their assigned scenario as fixed. They must record three specific elements: their delivery steps, their primary tradeoffs, and their major shortcomings or risks. Facilitator checks tables to ensure teams do not negotiate against their assigned constraints.

### 3. Present approaches and trade-offs (12 minutes)

Call the room back together. Each subgroup takes up to 3 minutes to present their flipchart diagram, outlining their operational path and what they had to sacrifice to hit the constraints. Maximum 4 presentations.

### 4. Debrief and extract non-negotiables (8 minutes)

Facilitate a full-room discussion comparing approaches across the extreme conditions. Identify ideas that worked across multiple scenarios and isolate the constraints the team considers truly non-negotiable.


## Debrief questions

- Which tactics appeared in multiple scenarios despite the opposite resource conditions?
- What critical risks or tradeoffs emerged that our real-world plan must avoid at all costs?
- Which variables do we now consider truly non-negotiable versus flexible?

**Finished output:** Subgroup flipchart diagrams detailing operational approaches under extreme constraints, plus a shared list of non-negotiable constraints and transferable tactics for real-world execution.

## Remote

Run in video breakout rooms. Provide each breakout room with an online whiteboard frame pre-loaded with the scenario sliders and structured boxes for Delivery Steps, Tradeoffs, and Shortcomings. Bring all participants back to the main room and have the designated screen-share presenter show their board within a 3-minute hard timer.

## Hybrid

Keep in-person and remote participants in separate distinct subgroups. Remote teams use a shared digital board; in-person teams use a physical flipchart and take a photo to post into the shared digital space before the report-out phase so all attendees can view each artifact clearly.

## Access and participation choices

- Subgroups use multiple roles: note taker, verbal contributor, visual sketcher, and presenter. Participants choose their mode of contribution.
- Anyone may opt out of verbal presenting during the share-out phase by designating a peer presenter without explanation.

## If the session gets stuck

**A subgroup spends their planning time fighting the constraints and insisting the scenario cannot happen.**

Intervene immediately and redirect: 'Assume an eccentric sponsor made this mandatory. You cannot change the constraints. What radical choices or sacrifices would you make to hit this target?'

**Groups only list high-level slogans without concrete implementation tactics.**

Prompt them to write three distinct operational moves: who does the work, what gets cut, and what is the sequence of events.


## Terms used here

- Slider: A continuous scale between two extreme values, used here as an adjustable constraint setting.
- Tradeoff: A compromise where one desirable quality is sacrificed to gain another result required by constraints.

## Participant material: Scenario Slider Worksheet

PROJECT INITIATIVE:
[Write the core initiative being tested]

ASSIGNED SCENARIO SLIDERS:
- Budget: [ ] Bare Minimum ($0 to shoestring)  |  [ ] Unlimited Capital
- Staffing: [ ] 1 person dedicated part-time    |  [ ] Full dedicated cross-functional squad
- Timeline: [ ] 30 days hard deadline          |  [ ] Open-ended, quality-driven

YOUR TASK:
Assume your assigned settings are non-negotiable facts. Do not debate feasibility.

RECORD ON YOUR FLIPCHART:
1. Core Operational Plan: What are the 3 to 5 key steps you take to execute?
2. Necessary Tradeoffs: What compromises did you consciously make?
3. Shortcomings and Risks: Where is this approach fragile or incomplete?

## Sources and adaptation

Observed on Gamestorming (post titled 'Knowledge Game: The Scenario Slider' credited to Aaron) and cataloged on SessionLab. Based on public game instructions.

Retained the core Gamestorming mechanic of setting 2-3 extreme constraint sliders across parallel groups, modeling business approaches, and debriefing tradeoffs and non-negotiables. Added realistic time pacing (45 minutes total), explicit subgroup size and role structures, facilitator intervention prompts, and a standardized participant planning template.

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/knowledge-game-the-scenario-slider)

[Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/knowledge-game-the-scenario-slider/)

[SessionLab](https://www.sessionlab.com/methods/scenario-slider)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/scenario-slider/