# Rose, Bud, Thorn

Participants write positive highlights (Roses), future opportunities (Buds), and current obstacles (Thorns) on sticky notes, cluster key items, and select priorities for action.

**Time:** 15 minutes. 15-minute standard session fitting the 5 to 15 minute band in source records.
**People:** 4 to 24. Individual note writing followed by small groups of 3 or 4 (groups of 2 or 5 used as needed to absorb odd numbers without leaving anyone alone), concluding in whole-room synthesis.

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Catalog current successes, potential opportunities, and operational obstacles across a shared project or timeframe.
**Use it when:** Use during project retrospectives, milestone reviews, or problem-framing sessions when a team needs balanced input on what to protect, explore, and fix.
**Skip it when:** Skip during acute team conflict or when urgent decisions require deep root-cause analysis rather than broad, surface-level reflection.

## Materials and tools

- Sticky notes in three colors or standard pads labeled R, B, T (at least 6 notes per person)
- One fine-tip marker per person
- Wall space, whiteboard, or poster paper divided into three labeled columns: Rose, Bud, Thorn
- Digital whiteboard tool if running online or hybrid

## Before participants arrive

1. Divide the wall, whiteboard, or poster paper into three columns labeled Rose, Bud, and Thorn.
2. Place sticky notes and markers at each workspace before the session begins.

## Say this to open

We will take three minutes to reflect on our work using three categories: Rose, Bud, and Thorn. A Rose is a highlight or something that went well. A Bud is an opportunity, fresh idea, or something you look forward to exploring. A Thorn is a challenge, stress point, or bottleneck. Aim for one note per category, but you can pass on any category or keep personal notes private. Write clearly with one thought per note.

## How to run it

### 1. Introduce categories and write silently (3 minutes)

Speak the opening script to introduce the categories. Participants write silently, putting one thought per sticky note. For example, a Rose could be 'Client approved sprint goals without changes', not just 'Good week'. Writing stops when the timer sounds.

### 2. Small group review and selection (5 minutes)

Form groups of 3 to 4. Pairs or groups of 5 absorb uneven numbers so nobody works alone. Each member shares their notes quickly. The subgroup clusters duplicates and selects exactly one Rose, one Bud, and one Thorn from their combined pool to post under the matching columns on the main board.

### 3. Review columns and debrief (4 minutes)

Call attention to the central board. Walk through the posted notes, reading two to three representative items per column aloud without naming authors. Pose one or more debrief questions from the list and invite brief observations from volunteers.

### 4. Prioritize immediate next steps (3 minutes)

Direct everyone to scan the posted Buds and Thorns. Call for a show of hands to pick one Thorn to eliminate and one Bud to test. Assign an owner for each chosen item and record both items and owner names visibly next to the columns.


## Debrief questions

- Looking at our Thorns, which one poses the most immediate risk if ignored?
- Which Bud has the strongest potential to become a Rose in our next cycle?
- What surprised you about the positive highlights posted under Roses?

**Finished output:** A board of clustered project highlights, opportunities, and obstacles, concluding with one selected Thorn and one selected Bud assigned to named owners for team action.

## Remote

Set up a digital whiteboard with three columns: Rose, Bud, Thorn. Participants write digital notes silently in the main room. Move into breakout rooms of 3 to 4 participants for 5 minutes to select and post top cards. Return to the main room for facilitator-led debrief and digital hand voting.

## Hybrid

Remote participants post directly to a shared digital whiteboard while in-person participants write physical notes. Assign one in-person scribe to duplicate digital notes onto the physical board so both cohorts see the entire set. Conduct the final priority vote by counting raised hands on camera and in the room simultaneously.

## Access and participation choices

- Participants may post notes without names or pass on any category without giving a reason.
- Speaking during the debrief is optional; participants may submit written feedback or use hand signals to vote.

## If the session gets stuck

**Participants write personal criticisms of colleagues under Thorn.**

Remind the room that Thorns must describe workflow, tools, or process friction rather than individual personalities.

**Participants confuse Buds with Roses by listing past successes as opportunities.**

Clarify that a Rose is an accomplished fact, whereas a Bud is an unformed potential or forward-looking test.


## Terms used here

- Rose: A positive outcome, highlight, or current strength.
- Bud: An area of opportunity, emerging idea, or potential future success.
- Thorn: A challenge, frustration, bottleneck, or area of friction.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in EasyRetro documentation as a design thinking and retrospective exercise.

Retained the Rose, Bud, Thorn categorization scheme documented in EasyRetro sources. UWT added exact 15-minute pacing, guidance for handling odd numbers in small groups, subgroup selection rules of one item per column to keep discussions on schedule, an aligned opening script with explicit pass options, and hybrid facilitation details.

[EasyRetro](https://easyretro.io/templates/rose-bud-thorn/)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/rose-bud-thorn-design-thinking-exercise/