# Group Grope Exchange

Participants draft suggestions on index cards, trade and filter them through silent table swaps and partner bargaining, and cluster into small teams to negotiate three final cards illustrated on a text-free visual poster.

**Time:** 40 minutes. Extended to 40 minutes from the source 30-40 minute window to allow sufficient time for all team presentations and structured debrief.
**People:** 6 to 24. Individual drafting and trading, then self-selected teams of 3 to 6 people (teams of 2 or 7 permitted if arithmetic requires)

## Choose this exercise

**Purpose:** Exchange, prioritize, and reach consensus on practical suggestions for an organizational topic.
**Use it when:** Use when a group needs to pool diverse ideas, surface differing perspectives, and converge on shared priorities without open-floor debate.
**Skip it when:** Skip when priorities are already decided or when participants must produce individual uncompromised plans.

## Materials and tools

- 4 blank index cards per person
- Pens or markers (1 per person)
- At least 20 pre-written suggestion cards (2 per expected participant minimum)
- Flipchart paper or poster board (1 sheet per team of 3 to 6)
- Broad-tip colored markers (1 set per team)
- 1 central table for card pool
- Countdown timer

## Before participants arrive

1. Write at least 20 suggestion cards covering practical and innovative angles on the topic.
2. Spread surplus cards face-up across a central table.
3. Place 4 blank index cards and a pen at each seat.

## Say this to open

We are going to collect, exchange, and narrow down our ideas on our topic. Start by writing four distinct suggestions on your cards. Later, you will trade cards, join others with matching ideas, and select your top three.

## How to run it

### 1. Write suggestions (5 minutes)

Introduce the focus topic and speak the opening script. Everyone writes one concrete suggestion on each of their 4 blank cards. Collect all participant cards, mix them with the facilitator-prepared cards, and deal 3 cards back to each participant.

### 2. Rank and silent table swap (4 minutes)

Participants read their 3 cards and arrange them in personal preference order. Direct participants to visit the central table in silence. They may discard any card from their hand and take a replacement from the table, keeping exactly 3 cards at all times.

### 3. Pair bargaining swap (5 minutes)

Open the floor for spoken trades. Participants mingle, compare cards in pairs, and negotiate one-for-one trades to improve their hands. Every participant must trade at least one card with a peer and end with exactly 3 cards.

### 4. Form teams and consolidate (6 minutes)

Participants cluster with colleagues holding similar cards to form teams of 3 to 6 people. If numbers do not divide evenly (such as 7, 11, or 13), teams of 2 or 7 are permitted. Each team reviews its combined cards and negotiates down to exactly 3 final cards that all members accept, setting aside the rest.

### 5. Create visual poster (8 minutes)

Give each team flipchart paper and markers. Teams make a poster illustrating the ideas on their 3 final cards using only drawings, symbols, and diagrams. No words or letters are allowed. Give a 1-minute warning before time expires.

### 6. Show and debrief (12 minutes)

Each team reads its 3 cards aloud, presents its poster, and explains its visual choices (up to 1 minute per team, accommodating up to 8 teams). Use the remaining time to ask 2 debrief questions for whole-room reflection.


## Debrief questions

- Which cards were discarded quickly, and why did those ideas fail to get traction?
- How did your team resolve disagreements when picking your final three cards?
- What common theme runs across the posters produced by different teams?

**Finished output:** A set of three consensus suggestion cards and an accompanying visual poster from each team.

## Remote

Set up a shared digital canvas with private numbered working frames for each participant and a central pool frame. Facilitator pastes 3 pre-written digital notes into each participant frame. For the silent exchange, participants move unwanted notes into the pool and drag replacements out. For direct trades, pairs meet in 2-person breakout rooms and paste notes into each other's frame. Consolidated teams draw on a shared digital canvas without typing text.

## Hybrid

Run parallel in-person and remote tracks for drafting and trading. Remote participants swap digital notes on a shared canvas; in-person participants swap index cards. For the joint readout, broadcast remote posters via room projector and point a room webcam at physical posters holding a microphone close to presenters.

## Access and participation choices

- Offer an option to dictate card text or have a designated partner write and draw.
- Participants may pass on speaking during the final poster readout while remaining part of team consensus.

## If the session gets stuck

**A participant cannot find a trading partner during the pair bargaining swap.**

Step in as a trading partner or pair them with someone who has completed only one swap.

**Teams write text labels or sentences on their visual posters.**

Remind everyone that posters must rely entirely on symbols, diagrams, and illustrations, reserving words for the spoken readout.


## Terms used here

- Framegame: A reusable instructional activity structure designed to carry different contents without altering core rules.

## Sources and adaptation

Observed in Play for Performance (November 2005), published by The Thiagi Group, where Sivasailam Thiagarajan describes 'Group Grope: The Frame' (attributed to 1971) and demonstrates it through 'TCF: The Game'.

Retained the Group Grope game frame from the November 2005 Play for Performance newsletter (TCF: The Game flow: write 4 cards, deal 3, silent pool swap, pair bargaining trade, team clustering around 3 cards, and text-free poster). Standardized to 40 minutes to comfortably fit team readouts and debrief for up to 24 participants. Added arithmetic rules for group partitioning, clarified remote digital facilitation mechanisms, and specified cross-room display mechanics for hybrid delivery.

[The Thiagi Group](http://thiagi.net/archive/www/pfp/IE4H/november2005.html)

[The Thiagi Group](https://thiagi.net/archive/www/pfp/IE4H/november2005.html)

Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/pfp-november-2005/