# Card Prompt Mapping Small groups lay out topic prompt cards, cluster them into themes, and record their team's specific context around each element. The result is a shared visual map of the project scope with concrete notes on priorities and blind spots. **Time:** 15 minutes. 15 minutes suggested by UWT based on the 6 standard MethodKit conversation patterns (discuss, map, sort, brainstorm, prioritize, develop) **People:** 4 to 24. Table groups of 3 to 5 participants working in parallel ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Map the parts of a project or topic together so participants align on shared terminology and current context. **Use it when:** Use at project kickoff or sprint planning when a team needs to define scope across multiple angles without starting from a blank page. **Skip it when:** Skip when the meeting requires a quick binary decision or when a structured backlog already defines all immediate work. ## Materials and tools - One deck of topic cards (or the provided printable Project Building Blocks) per table - One pad of 3x3 inch sticky notes per table - One fine-tip marker per participant - Tabletop space or wall space for each small group ## Before participants arrive 1. Print and cut one set of Project Building Blocks cards for each table. 2. Place card sets, sticky notes, and pens in the center of each small group table. 3. Clear table space so cards can be spread out flat. ## Say this to open Most planning sessions start from zero. Today we will use concept prompt cards to pull context out of our heads and onto the table. Each card represents one angle of our project. In small groups, you will spread the cards out, select the ones relevant to our current work, cluster them into themes, and add sticky notes showing our current reality for each card. ## How to run it ### 1. Introduce and spread cards (3 minutes) Deliver opening script. Direct tables to divide into groups of 3 to 5. One person at each table spreads the card deck face up so every card title is visible. Participants review cards silently. ### 2. Select and cluster themes (4 minutes) Table members sort cards into three piles: Relevant Now, Relevant Later, and Not Applicable. Move the Relevant Now cards to the center. Group these selected cards into 2 to 4 thematic clusters. ### 3. Annotate current context (5 minutes) Participants write short notes on sticky notes (one fact, constraint, or decision per note) and attach them directly next to the corresponding card. For example, next to 'Target Audience', write 'Junior developers onboarding this quarter'. ### 4. Debrief and capture (3 minutes) Ask groups to pause. Take a photo of each table's mapped arrangement. Hear brief observations from two tables on key discoveries or blind spots surfaced by the cards. ## Debrief questions - Which card triggered the most discussion or revealed an unspoken assumption? - What important project element was in the Relevant Later pile that someone expected in Relevant Now? - How did mapping these elements change your view of our immediate priorities? **Finished output:** A photographed tabletop card map with sticky notes capturing the group's agreed project elements and context. ## Remote Set up a shared digital whiteboard (such as Miro or Mural) with each card title represented as a digital rectangle. Place small groups in breakout rooms of 3 to 5 people. Groups drag cards into columns (Relevant Now, Later, Not Applicable) and attach digital sticky notes beside them. Breakouts return to main room at minute 12. ## Hybrid In-person members gather around a physical table while remote members join a breakout room with a digital board containing identical card titles. Appoint one in-person scribe to take a mid-point photo and post it to the remote group's channel, or maintain two separate maps that are compared in the final debrief. ## Access and participation choices - Provide large-print card text for participants with visual strain. - Participants may contribute by writing sticky notes, moving physical cards, or speaking observations. - Anyone may choose to observe silently or pass on verbal reporting during debrief. ## If the session gets stuck **Groups spend all their time debating whether a single card is relevant.** Remind tables that cards can be placed on the border between Now and Later. Tell them to log the disagreement on a sticky note and move to the next card. **One dominant participant dictates card placement for the entire table.** Ask each participant to pick two cards they personally consider vital, place them on the table, and explain why before open clustering begins. ## Terms used here - Prompt card: A physical or digital card showing a single concept or domain element used to stimulate focused discussion. ## Participant material: Project Building Blocks (Printable Card Deck) Target Audience Problem Statement Core Value Proposition Key Constraints Timeline & Milestones Budget & Resources Success Metrics Dependencies Technical Architecture Communication Channels Regulatory & Legal User Feedback Channels Team Roles & Ownership Launch Strategy Risks & Unknowns Maintenance & Handoff ## Sources and adaptation Observed in MethodKit workshop materials and product descriptions (MethodKit, 2012-2026), describing cards used for mapping, sorting, prioritizing, and discussing shared context. Retained the defining MethodKit mechanic of using topic prompt cards to establish a shared language through sorting, mapping, and annotating. Added a specific 15-minute 4-step facilitation sequence, subgroup sizing, access accommodations, and a neutral 16-item Project Building Blocks card deck template to make the activity fully runnable from the page. [MethodKit](http://www.methodkit.com/shop/methodkit-with-trends/) [MethodKit](http://www.methodkit.com/shop/methodkit-with-tech-building-blocks/) [MethodKit](http://www.methodkit.com/shop/methodkit-with-human-needs/) [MethodKit](https://methodkit.com/author/methodkitadmin/) Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/methodkit-methodkit/