# Appreciative Inquiry: The 4D Workshop Participants conduct appreciative interviews about peak team moments, synthesize common strengths, and turn them into a collective vision, actionable proposals, and immediate commitments. **Time:** 105 minutes. Based on the 90 to 120 minute compressed single-topic session in the source evidence. **People:** 8 to 24. Initial pairs (or one trio if an odd number of participants is present), merging into small groups of 4 to 6, then whole-room synthesis. ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Surface proven historical strengths to build practical proposals and committed next steps for a chosen topic. **Use it when:** Use when a team needs to plan an initiative, merge workflows, or reset direction by building on existing successes rather than cataloging problems. **Skip it when:** Skip during an acute crisis requiring immediate operational fixes, immediately after unaddressed layoffs or severe conflict, or when the group needs root-cause defect analysis. ## Materials and tools - One printed interview worksheet per participant - 8 to 12 sheets of flip chart paper - Two pads of sticky notes per small group of 4 to 6 - Thick markers (one per participant) - Roll of wall-safe masking tape - One countdown timer visible to the room - Sheet of dot stickers (3 dots per participant) for proposal prioritization ## Before participants arrive 1. Select a single affirmative topic before the workshop, framed as what the team wants more of (for example: Effective Cross-Team Collaboration). 2. Pre-print the interview worksheet with appreciative prompts for every participant. 3. Post four blank flip chart sheets on the wall, titled: Themes from Our Stories, Our Dream, Design Principles, and Commitments. 4. Arrange chairs in pairs around the room with space for private conversation. ## Say this to open Today we will explore our topic by looking directly at what works when we perform at our best. Instead of cataloging deficits, we will move through four stages: Discovering proven strengths, Dreaming what those strengths look like scaled up, Designing practical proposals, and deciding our Destiny through clear personal commitments. Find a partner, ideally someone you do not collaborate with daily, and take one interview worksheet each. ## How to run it ### 1. Frame and connect (10 minutes) Explain the four phases: Discover, Dream, Design, and Destiny. State the affirmative topic clearly. Announce that participants will interview each other. Have participants form pairs, with one trio if the headcount is odd. Have everyone read the interview guide silently for 1 minute. ### 2. Discover: paired interviews (25 minutes) Pairs run their interviews for 20 minutes total (10 minutes each). If a trio exists, allocate 6 to 7 minutes per speaker so all three finish within the 20 minutes. Keep time and announce role swaps. After interviews finish, pairs and trios spend 5 minutes reviewing their notes together and writing 2 to 3 core recurring strengths on separate sticky notes. ### 3. Discover: cluster strengths (10 minutes) Bring the full room together. Each pair or trio posts their sticky notes onto the Themes from Our Stories wall chart, reading each aloud in 5 words or fewer. Group similar ideas together with the room and label the top 3 to 5 theme clusters. ### 4. Dream: imagine the future (20 minutes) Combine pairs into small groups of 4 to 6. Give each group one flip chart sheet and markers. Prompt: Imagine it is three years from now and these discovered strengths are our everyday reality. What does success look like at its absolute best? Groups spend 12 minutes drafting a headline, sketch, or brief narrative. Each group presents their vision in 90 seconds. Record shared patterns on the Our Dream flip chart. ### 5. Design: actionable proposals (20 minutes) Keep the same small groups. Instruct each group to draft 2 concrete proposals that turn the dream into reality using their discovered strengths. Each proposal must state: What will we do? Who is involved? What is the first step? Groups post proposals on the wall. Distribute 3 dot stickers per person for silent voting on the most actionable proposals. ### 6. Destiny: commit to action (15 minutes) Review the top-voted proposals. Invite participants to self-select by standing next to the proposal they want to implement. Action groups take 5 minutes to agree on a lead owner and target date for Step 1, writing them on the Commitments chart. Every participant then writes down one personal action they will complete within 7 days without needing outside sign-off. Up to 4 volunteers share their personal action aloud. ### 7. Close and debrief (5 minutes) Acknowledge the work completed across all four phases. Invite up to 4 voluntary reflections on what surprised people about the process. Confirm that photos of all wall charts will be circulated to everyone within 24 hours. ## Debrief questions - Which discovered strength surprised you by appearing across multiple stories? - How did framing proposals around past successes change the discussion compared to regular problem-solving? - What is one concrete habit that will help your action group carry out its commitment next week? **Finished output:** Four completed wall charts (Themes, Dream, Design Principles, Commitments) with named owners and target dates for top proposals, plus individual 7-day personal actions. ## Remote Run on a video meeting platform with breakout rooms. Post the affirmative topic and interview prompts in chat and on a shared digital board. In Step 2, assign pairs to 2-person rooms (or one 3-person room if odd) for 20 minutes of interviews (10 minutes each, or 6 to 7 minutes each in a trio), followed by 5 minutes to record themes on the board. Step 3 combines participants into breakout rooms of 4 to 6 to build a shared Dream canvas. Step 4 uses the same breakout groups to post proposals on a Design board, followed by digital dot voting. For Step 5, set up breakout spaces by proposal title for commitment planning, and have everyone paste a 7-day personal commitment into chat. ## Hybrid Pair in-person participants with in-person partners and remote participants with remote breakout partners for Step 2. Small groups for Steps 3 and 4 should be either all in-person or all remote to prevent audio confusion. Remote groups use a digital whiteboard while physical groups use paper flip charts. An in-person facilitator transcribes physical sticky notes and proposals onto the shared digital board so all participants see every option during voting and commitments. ## Access and participation choices - Participants may choose to write their interview responses directly or have their partner scribe for them. - Sharing stories from a past project or previous organization is explicitly allowed if someone is new or lacks an immediate example. - Anyone may pass on reading their personal 7-day commitment aloud during the plenary close. ## If the session gets stuck **An interviewee starts listing systemic complaints or deficits instead of a peak experience.** Remind the participant: Note that concern on your notepad so it is not lost, but for this interview, locate one specific time when something worked, even on a small scale. **Groups get caught up in budget limits or logistics during the Dream phase.** Pause the group and remind them: Set delivery barriers aside for this step. Describe what the ideal result looks like first; we will test logistics in the Design phase. **Action commitments in Destiny are vague, such as 'we will follow up soon.'** Ask the group: Who will schedule the first 30-minute working session, and on what exact weekday will that invitation be sent? ## Terms used here - 4D Cycle: The four progressive stages of Appreciative Inquiry: Discover (strengths), Dream (vision), Design (proposals), and Destiny (commitments). - Affirmative Topic: The chosen focus of the workshop, framed positively around what the team wants to create rather than what it wants to fix. ## Participant material: Appreciative Inquiry Interview Guide AFFIRMATIVE TOPIC: [Insert Workshop Topic] INSTRUCTIONS: Interview your partner for 10 minutes. Listen with curiosity. Ask follow-up questions to understand what made their story possible. Do not debate or offer solutions yet. Take notes below. Then swap roles. (If in a trio, take 6 to 7 minutes per interview). QUESTION 1: PEAK EXPERIENCE Think about a time when you experienced [Affirmative Topic] at its absolute best, where you felt proud, engaged, or energized by the outcome. What happened? Tell the story from the beginning. Notes: QUESTION 2: CORE CONDITIONS Looking back at that experience, what made it possible? What personal strengths did you bring? What did others do? What environment or structures supported that success? Notes: QUESTION 3: FUTURE WISH If you had three wishes to amplify what made that experience successful and make it normal practice across our whole group, what would you choose? Notes: PAIR / TRIO SYNTHESIS (5 minutes after interviews): Review the stories together. Identify 2 to 3 common themes, conditions, or strengths. Write each theme on a separate sticky note. ## Sources and adaptation Observed in WorkshopBank documentation as 'Appreciative Inquiry: The 4D Workshop'. The underlying Appreciative Inquiry methodology is attributed in the source to David Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva at Case Western Reserve University in the mid-1980s. Retained the 4-phase cycle (Discover, Dream, Design, Destiny), paired appreciative interviews, thematic sticky clustering, and self-selected commitment teams from WorkshopBank evidence. UWT specified a balanced 105-minute schedule, an explicit trio mechanic for odd participant counts, consistent remote breakout timing, and complete printable materials. [WorkshopBank](https://workshopbank.com/tools/appreciative-inquiry-4d-workshop) Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/appreciative-inquiry-the-4d-workshop-workshopbank/