# Nurturing Intentional Empathy Small groups analyze a scenario of interpersonal tension and write a two-part response that names an underlying emotion and asks an exploratory question. The cohort compares drafts to practice separating empathy from immediate problem-solving. **Time:** 35 minutes. Based on the source's core timings: 5 min intro, 5 min scenario review, 10 min response drafting, and 15 min debrief. The optional 5 min refining step can be added if time permits. **People:** 4 to 24. Pairs or trios, followed by whole-room debrief ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Practice formulating responses that name another speaker's emotion and inquire into its situational causes instead of rushing to debate or solve problems. **Use it when:** Use when a team struggles with defensive conversations, dismisses emotional cues during deliberations, or needs structured practice in reflective listening. **Skip it when:** Skip during an active, high-stakes dispute where participants need third-party mediation rather than an abstract role-play exercise. ## Materials and tools - One printed scenario worksheet per participant or a shared digital document - One Emotion Wheel or feelings list reference card per subgroup - Pens or note paper for each subgroup ## Before participants arrive 1. Select either Scenario One (academic team) or Scenario Two (community transit) to focus on. 2. Print copies of the selected scenario and emotion list, or prepare display slides. 3. Arrange seating into clusters for pairs or trios of three. ## Say this to open When tension rises in group work, we often leap directly into fixing the problem or defending our position. Today we will practice intentional empathy. This means pausing to see circumstances through someone else's lens, acknowledging the specific emotion they are expressing, and asking an open question to uncover the situation behind that feeling. We will examine a short case and write a two-part response. ## How to run it ### 1. Introduce Intentional Empathy (5 minutes) Present the two-part formula for an intentional empathy response: first, acknowledge and name the specific emotion you hear; second, ask an open question to explore the circumstances that caused it. Clarify that the goal is not to solve the dispute or agree with the behavior, but to understand the speaker's perspective. ### 2. Review Scenario and Identify Emotions (5 minutes) Have participants work in pairs or trios. Direct them to read the chosen scenario aloud together. Using the Emotion Wheel reference, groups identify at least two emotions experienced by the speakers in the exchange. ### 3. Draft Empathic Inquiries (10 minutes) Instruct each subgroup to draft a response that Participant 1 can say back to one of the other speakers. The response must follow the two-part formula: name the sensed feeling without judgment, then ask a clarifying question about the speaker's situation. For example: 'It sounds like you are feeling overwhelmed by your workload. What parts of the project are feeling most difficult to manage right now?' Groups write their draft sentence on scratch paper. ### 4. Debrief and Compare Approaches (15 minutes) Call the room together. Hear drafts from 3 or 4 groups. Examine whether the statements stayed with emotional recognition or slipped into premature problem-solving. Facilitate a discussion using the debrief questions. ## Debrief questions - What made it easy or difficult to avoid jumping straight into solving the practical problem? - How does naming an emotion change the direction of a tense conversation compared to countering an argument? - In your actual working groups, when would this two-part response help, and when might it feel unnatural or inappropriate? **Finished output:** Written two-part empathic response statements created by each subgroup. ## Remote Distribute the scenario text and emotion vocabulary sheet in a shared document or slide deck. Send pairs or trios into breakout rooms for 15 minutes to review the scenario and write their statement into a shared document. Regroup in the main room for plenary debrief. ## Hybrid Provide remote participants with a live digital copy of the scenario and emotion wheel. Form distinct all-remote pairs or trios and all-in-person pairs or trios so discussion dynamics remain equal. Remote groups paste their drafted responses into a shared chat or document visible on the room projector during debrief. ## Access and participation choices - Provide written scenario text alongside spoken instructions for participants who process text visually. - Participants may write their drafts quietly, read aloud, or pass on sharing in the plenary room. ## If the session gets stuck **Groups draft solutions rather than empathy inquiries (e.g., 'I hear you, so let us reschedule the meeting').** Remind participants to separate listening from negotiating. Ask them to delete the proposal and replace it with a question that asks about the speaker's experience. **Participants get stuck guessing the 'right' emotion from the wheel.** Clarify that naming an emotion in real dialogue is an offer to check understanding, not a diagnosis. Explain that tentativeness ('It sounds like you might be feeling anxious...') invites the speaker to clarify. ## Terms used here - Intentional Empathy: Deliberately reflecting back another person's perceived emotion and inquiring about the circumstances behind it before offering solutions. - Emotion Wheel: A circular diagram categorizing basic emotions and their more specific nuance words to aid emotional vocabulary. ## Participant material: Practice Scenarios Scenario One: Academic Group Project Students working on a high-stakes group project face friction. Student 1: 'I know I did not make the meeting last night but my schedule is nuts and I figured I could just email you an update about my part.' Student 2: 'But we needed you here to think with us. And I keep reminding the group this project is supposed to be a group effort, but no one seems to pay any attention to this.' Student 1: 'We are all working on parts of it, so we are making it a group effort. Plus, there is no way I could have been here last night. I had to pick up another shift at work.' Student 3: 'I have to get an A on this project. My GPA depends on it. I am applying to law school and I really need an A in this class.' Student 2: 'Well the only way we will get an A is if everyone stops flaking and shows up for meetings!' Scenario Two: Community Transit Advisory Committee A community advisory group discusses municipal transit planning. Participant 1: 'We have been focusing on bus service quite a bit, but I think we also need to consider how the city might set up a formal mechanism for ride sharing as well.' Participant 2: 'But ride share programs overlook the reality that many people face. As usual, it seems as if solutions are favoring those who have options and multiple options available to them.' Participant 1: 'But our bus ridership numbers are way down so we need to look at other transportation options.' Participant 2: 'You want to know why ridership is down? Because they have changed and decreased the bus routes. There is not one route that I can use every day at the same time to get to work. People are not using the buses because they have been forced to find other ways to get to work that are reliable. I have been late to work 5 times this month. I can’t lose this job.' ## Sources and adaptation Observed in materials from the Collaborative Discussion Project under the title 'Nurturing Intentional Empathy'. The source notes use of Geoffrey Roberts' Emotion Wheel with permission. Retained the source's core definition of intentional empathy, two scenario scripts, and explicit two-part response mechanic (name emotion, ask about circumstances). Standardized duration to 35 minutes to match the source breakdown (5+5+10+15 min). Added a neutral drafting example, clear subgroup logistics, and hybrid considerations. [Collaborative Discussion Project](https://www.collaborativediscussionproject.com/items-1/45nurturingintentionalempathy) Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/5-nurturing-intentional-empathy/