# Four-Phrase Resume Participants write four brief phrases capturing facets of their background, then review them in small groups to map common history, skills, and shared interests. **Time:** 15 minutes. Source indicates 5 to 15 minutes. UWT standardizes on 15 minutes to allow individual writing, small-group dialogue, and whole-room review. **People:** 4 to 24. Individual drafting, then subgroups of 2 to 4 participants. For example, 5 divides into a 2 and a 3; 11 divides into a 3 and two 4s. ## Choose this exercise **Purpose:** Surface shared experiences, skills, and background details across participants using short, self-selected summary phrases. **Use it when:** Use during kickoffs, onboarding sessions, or cross-functional assemblies when participants need an efficient way to discover common ground without long presentations. **Skip it when:** Skip when participants already work closely together daily and know one another's histories, or when the agenda requires verified formal credentials. ## Materials and tools - 1 index card or blank sheet of paper per participant - 1 pen or pencil per participant - 1 large sticky note or half-sheet of paper per subgroup - 1 central flipchart or whiteboard with instructions written visibly - Smartphone or camera for facilitator (hybrid delivery only) - Shared digital whiteboard workspace (remote and hybrid delivery only) ## Before participants arrive 1. Write the prompt on a central flipchart or virtual board: 'Write 4 short phrases that summarize your background, life, or skills. Any era or topic is valid.' 2. Place index cards, pens, and one large sticky note at each table cluster, or prepare breakout workspaces online. ## Say this to open Take an index card and write down four short phrases that describe your background. You can include past jobs, odd skills, personal milestones, education, or hobbies. There is no rigid template, and you choose what to disclose. You have four minutes. ## How to run it ### 1. Draft four phrases (4 minutes) Participants work individually and write four distinct phrases on their card. Facilitator provides one neutral example: 'Ex-barista in Chicago; managed database migrations; parent of twin toddlers; amateur woodworker.' Everyone stops writing when the timer sounds. ### 2. Compare in small groups (5 minutes) Form groups of 2 to 4 participants. Each person reads their phrases round-robin. Members look for common background points, parallel skills, mutual contacts, or shared hobbies. The group picks one person to write 2 or 3 common threads or notable contrasts on the subgroup sticky note. ### 3. Post group notes (2 minutes) Each subgroup posts its sticky note on the central flipchart or wall. In hybrid setups, the facilitator takes a photo of physical notes and posts them to the digital board. ### 4. Whole-room reflection (4 minutes) Gather attention at the central board. The facilitator calls on two subgroups to share one unexpected overlap from their cards, then poses one debrief question to the room to close. ## Debrief questions - What common background point or shared interest surprised your group the most? - How did seeing personal details alongside professional skills change your view of your peers? **Finished output:** A set of completed four-phrase cards and a central board of posted subgroup notes documenting shared background points. ## Remote Run in a shared virtual whiteboard with breakout rooms of 2 to 4 people. Each person writes four phrases on an individual digital card in their breakout frame. In breakouts, members compare cards and write overlaps on a group sticky note. When returning to the main room, all groups review the central board together. ## Hybrid In-person participants write on physical cards and form physical groups of 2 to 4. Remote participants join virtual breakouts of 2 to 4 on a shared digital whiteboard. During posting time, remote groups type on the digital board while the facilitator photographs physical group notes and uploads them to the same board. The entire room views the digital board for the reflection step. ## Access and participation choices - Participants may select all professional, all personal, or mixed items based on personal comfort. - Any participant may write 'Pass' for any item, or participate in discussions strictly by listening without reading their card aloud. - Participants may type onto a personal device or dictate their phrases to a peer instead of handwriting. ## If the session gets stuck **Participants write full narrative paragraphs instead of short phrases.** Remind participants during the drafting step that each item must stay under ten words to keep cards quick to review. **One participant dominates the small-group conversation.** Instruct groups to use a round-robin format where each person reads exactly one phrase per turn until all cards are read. ## Sources and adaptation Observed in Relationship Makers Handbook, page 13. Retained the 4-phrase mechanic, open topic scope, small-group review (groups of 2 to 4), and identification of common background points from the Relationship Makers Handbook. UWT structured the 15-minute timeframe into explicit phases (4-minute drafting, 5-minute subgroup discussion, 2-minute posting, and 4-minute debrief), removed internal corporate terminology, and added hybrid equipment details. Current run sheet: https://unitedwetransform.com/exercises/4-phrase-resume/